Commons:Deletion requests/File:Angel BDSM.png

Pornographic, out of scope, not linked to except on a single user page (clean-up project) JN466 00:42, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

•  Keep, how is it pornographic? I see no genitalia, no implied sexual activity...it is a portrait of a person wearing a gag and blindfold. Within scope. Max Rebo Band^{"almost suspiciously excellent"} 14:26, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • "No implied sexual activity"? --JN466 16:59, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Bondage is not per se Pornography. This is clearly POV.Nemissimo (talk) 00:53, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

•  Keep Image is not pornografic; high quality, example of bondage and gaging. Within scope. Nemissimo (talk) 14:40, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
•  Keep No Pornography according to German (or as far as I know any other European) law. Same goes for the other BDSM-images shown here. --TheK (talk) 14:59, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
•  Keep Not pornographic, charges of pornography slanderous. --Melanom (talk) 15:54, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
•  Keep “Pornographic”? Get real. --Rosenzweig δ 00:48, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
•  Keep Sorry Jayen466, but that's nonsens. Antonsusi (talk) 01:48, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
•  Delete Only used on one user's talk page, User:Max Rebo Band. Uploaded by him. Scope says that such are not allowed as we are not a host of personal images for a gallery on user pages as this image is. Ottava Rima (talk) 23:56, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Awkward vote, since it's now in use at w:Cosplay under #Sexual_roleplay...guess that takes care of Scope images. Max Rebo Band^{"almost suspiciously excellent"} 00:31, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[1] --JN466 18:26, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep High quality image, fails the Miller test for me. -- llywrch (talk) 21:01, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
•  Delete simply out of scope... --Yikrazuul (talk) 23:42, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Awkward vote, since it's now in use at w:Cosplay under #Sexual_roleplay...guess that takes care of Scope images. Max Rebo Band^{"almost suspiciously excellent"} 00:31, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

•  Keep commons is not censored. The allegation of pornography says more about User:Jayen466/JN466 than about the picture. Erik Warmelink (talk) 00:27, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
•  Keep clearly in scope. Trycatch (talk) 08:52, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
•  Keep per MRB. - Stillwaterising (talk) 22:00, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kept Infrogmation (talk) 03:04, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]