User talk:Jayen466

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Thanks for the right identification of the plant. I re-named the file to File:Strelitzia_nicolai_A.jpg. Wouter (talk) 21:52, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pleasure. They are quite closely related, and it's easy to mistake Strelitzia nicolai for a struggling specimen of the travellers' palm. --Jayen466 12:48, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! --Jayen466 21:04, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

---

Hello, Jayen466!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:00, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Image:6 Sigma Normal distribution.jpg is uncategorized since 3 August 2009.

File:Crowley and Gates.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Mattnad (talk) 19:21, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Jayen!

Hast die Kasette noch? Wenn ja, könntest du sie erneut abfotografieren? In der derzeitigen Version gibt es Probleme mit der Schärfe im unteren Drittel des Bildes. Ich verbleibe mit besten Grüßen, High Contrast (talk) 07:35, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jayen, would you be willing to refactor your most recent statement at the admin boards? Your perspective may have been distorted a little bit by the particular time and situations where we have encountered each other. As such, you might not be aware that I resigned from two former mentorships and subsequently certified/gave statements at dispute resolution regarding their conduct. In 2007 I came very close to proposing a topic ban on Cirt at a sister project. It was his decision to stop edit warring (which had been the cause of his blocks), coupled with his growing record of quality content, that changed my mind. Another important factor was that during and after mentorship he was willing to file checkuser requests and admin board reports on trolls from Anonymous on exactly the same basis as disruptive behavior on the other side of the ideological fence.

It has been wonderful to see you contribute a good article at en:wiki on the subject; I hope it gets featured soon. If it had come to my attention sooner that someone was misusing German language sources to disrupt your work I would have helped sooner. Wikipedia, Commons, and the other WMF projects exist to serve and inform the public; it's important to bear in mind that shared mission--especially when conflict arises. Your speculations about my motives and priorities are pretty far from the truth, and reflect poorly on both of us. Would you be willing to modify that? Durova (talk) 19:44, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied to your message on my talkpage for continuity of the thread. Richard Harvey (talk) 05:43, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:PetitPiton.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:PetitPiton.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 23:03, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recent DR's you've started I can't find linked into any of the daily pages... like the ones here... Was there an error that kept them from being linked anywhere, noone can comment or act on them if they're not linked anywhere. Please check. Thanks! — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 05:26, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that too; I donÄt know what happened. I clicked on the Nominate for deletion option on the left. Any advice appreciated. ;) They may need to be added manually to the date page. --JN466 05:38, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, they're going to need to be transcluded into the date pages manually.. you know how? — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 05:49, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

done. --JN466 12:17, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good, now people can find them. :D — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 17:06, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Zum weitermachen nach dem --Fg68at de:Disk 00:32, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Und dann Category:Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse --Fg68at de:Disk 00:48, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe in den letzten 5 Jahren schon einiges gesehen, aber Dein projektübergreifender Ansatz nötig mir fast schon Respekt ab. Wesentlich peinlicher kann man persönlichen POV ohne faktische Basis kaum pushen. Herzlichen Glückwunsch.Nemissimo (talk) 01:07, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warum machst du dir so eine Mühe ? Es gibt für dich eine viel einfache Lösung für dein Problem: Lass die Webseiten von Commons und WP einfach zu. Dann hast du keine derartigen bilder mehr vor dir. Antonsusi (talk) 16:19, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deine Idee, dass ich prüde bin, sagt mehr über dich aus als mich. Wach mal auf. Ich hab ein Bild von Amanda Palmer auf meiner Benutzerseite. Schon mal von der gehört? Meinst du, das macht es irgendwie logisch plausibel, dass ich ein christlicher Fundamentalist bin oder was? --JN466 02:47, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think it may help if I clarify my position with regard to sexual content on Commons. I am in favour of two things:

1. A content rating/filter/access control system that enables parents, schools and libraries to regulate minors' access to adult content on Commons sites, if they wish or are legally required in their country to regulate such access.
2. The presence of adult material, including sexually explicit material, on Commons.

As long as we don't have (1), we should restrict the content of categories and galleries featuring explicit material to files that are actually used as educational content in some Wikimedia project. --JN466 01:41, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your very own POV. It might be a brilliant idea to stick to the projects' guidelines instead of making up your owns. Considering the fact that you are using terms on a regular basis you don't even basicly seem to understand (e.g. "pornography"), it might even be a nice step to buy one or two books on the subject before adding to the already immense current workload. Is it realy so hard to see? You are giving any potential age verification system a bad name by baseing your bogus DRs on obviously nonsense arguments. Nemissimo (talk) 19:21, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Die Amanda Palmer ist gewiss nur zur Tarnung auf deiner Benutzerseite, oder es ist Doppelmoral". Wie du an diesem Satz merkst (er war nicht ernst gemeint !), kann man User hier nur bedingt einschätzen. Es stehen uns nur die Edits zur Verfügung und die machen maximal 15% der normalen Kommunikation aus. Alle deine Edits passen auf das Bild eines mehr oder weniger bigotten Users und Bibelfanatikers. Gehe mal deine Beiträge zum Thema "Sexbilder auf Commons" durch und du kannst sehen, dass das auf eine solche Person passt. Wenn das falsch ist, dann musst du deine Edits so anpassen, dass man dich korrekter einschätzen kann. Gruß von Antonsusi (talk) 21:29, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I have 25,000 edits in en:WP, and 4,000 or so in de:WP. You are welcome to peruse them to form an opinion as to my being a "Bible fanatic". They include this one and this one. It may be comfortable to just go with your prejudice, but if you want to communicate meaningfully, do people the courtesy of doing some research before you judge them. --JN466 16:58, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am short on time. Could you check my recent contribution history. You'll find a bunch of porn-type images that are out of scope. I had nominated them for speedy, but various editors reverted my tags. If appropriate, you could nominate these for deletion. Jehochman (talk) 12:54, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my response to your remark about (mere) nudity at Commons talk:Sexual content. - Jmabel ! talk 16:22, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I understand Godwin's position, but voluntary compliance with 2257 I think has such a large list of benefits and a very small list of drawbacks. Please see my post to foundation-l here. Thanks. - Stillwaterising (talk) 23:36, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good day! I invite you, Jayen466, to write about Stillwaterising's latest strange request at Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#User:Taric25. Thank you. Taric25 (talk) 09:37, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think it may be time to do that poll. It's been a week since the last edit to the project or talk page, until mine just now suggesting it may be time to vote. Wnt (talk) 14:01, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Osho Drive By.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Gump Stump (talk) 15:48, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jayen466. You have new messages at Gump Stump's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

File:Suit_tie_bondage.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Saibo (Δ) 03:06, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jayen466, sorry for the DR.. however, the source seems not trustworthy to me (see my comment in DR). Do you see this differently? I think you should not what to upload and what not. Have I missed something? Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 03:08, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You may well be right. The blog has been around for a couple of years, and the owner says on the relevant page they were sent the image for inclusion, but it may not be enough. Tineye doesn't find any other copies online, and I can't find a copy in Flickr. It's no big deal if the image goes; it was just to have a male image to balance female images in an en:WP article. Cheers, --JN466 03:40, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Jayen466. More in the DR. :-) Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 09:23, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

this type of canvassing is not accepted in Commons (or any wiki). And that is not the frist one.

Please stop canvassing votes. That is a formal warning to you change your behaivor.

Thanks. Béria Lima ^msg 12:00, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've replied on the Gendergap list: [1]. These are systemic issues that are currently being discussed by the Foundation board, and they are appropriate topics of discussion on Foundation lists. I am not aware of anyone from these lists having voted in any of the discussions, and that is certainly not the purpose of my postings there. If you have anything else, please take it up with the mailing list moderators. --JN466 12:14, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:%E4%BA%92%E5%8A%A9%E5%AE%A2%E6%A0%88/%E5%85%B6%E4%BB%96#.E4.BB.8A.E5.A4.A9.E7.9A.84.E6.AF.8F.E6.97.A5.E5.9C.96.E7.89.87 One man dislike it and Others don't know why this image has been Quality image(有人认为不宜，回复他的人也没有表明为何成为每日圖片), 只在论是否合理，显然是不知道为什么，也在观望这里的讨论结果。Such is their viewpoint(观点大致就这样).--Cirnonine (talk) 21:55, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link and info --JN466 22:49, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	I hereby award Jayen466 with this Special Barnstar for all of the great work, dedication and contributions you make to Commons! And for also making me feel confident about my own contributions. Thank you so much! Missvain (talk) 01:19, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone ahead and deleted it, for a myriad of reasons. You were absolutely right, IMO, in your analysis. Sorry about the delay responding - Alison ^❤ 06:25, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Alison. :) --JN466 12:00, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jayen466,

I just wanted to inform you that an FP of yours have been nominated for delisting. Best wishes, --Slaunger (talk) 22:37, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know! --JN466 00:18, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - fyi I think you missed a sig on your vote at the santorum discussion.  7  12:23, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Jayen466, please note my revert http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Peyronie%27s_disease_shown_in_flaccid_penis.jpg&diff=66945008&oldid=66943364 Also see the intros of the respective categories. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 01:33, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see; I shouldn't have removed the cat, but replaced it with the one for kept files. Thanks for the pointer! Cheers, --JN466 03:22, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly, and you can use HotCat's ↓ for this. Just do not use HotCat for initially setting the category but use {{subst:nsdr}} (or with k or d parameter) - if you ever need it. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 03:34, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making comments (such as this) towards Niabot. They are nothing to do with the typic at hand and is unhelpful by creatming more drama. Bidgee (talk) 15:57, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commons talk:Photographs of identifiable people#Another redraft

I would very much appreciate your comments on this redraft. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 13:11, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. Please do not add comments to closed discussions, as you did in this edit. Thank you, Sven Manguard Wha? 21:27, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]