Monetary Policy with Judgment
Paolo Gelain and
Simone Manganelli
No 20-14, Working Papers from Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
Abstract:
We consider two approaches to incorporate judgment into DSGE models. First, Bayesian estimation indirectly imposes judgment via priors on model parameters, which are then mapped into a judgmental interest rate decision. Standard priors are shown to be associated with highly unrealistic judgmental decisions. Second, judgmental interest rate decisions are directly provided by the decision maker and incorporated into a formal statistical decision rule using frequentist procedures. When the observed interest rates are interpreted as judgmental decisions, they are found to be consistent with DSGE models for long stretches of time, but excessively tight in the 1980s and late 1990s and excessively loose in the late 1970s and early 2000s.
JEL-codes: C12 E47 E50 E58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 44
Date: 2020-05-21
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cba, nep-dge, nep-ecm, nep-mac, nep-mon and nep-ore
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.26509/frbc-wp-202014 Full Text
Related works:
Working Paper: Monetary policy with judgment (2020)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedcwq:88033
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
DOI: 10.26509/frbc-wp-202014
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by 4D Library ().