Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1010101001110… |
… | …10000001111100 |
3 | 20020011022000000 |
4 | 11110322001330 |
5 | 140334213102 |
6 | 12511234300 |
7 | 2133414114 |
oct | 524720174 |
9 | 206138000 |
10 | 89366652 |
11 | 46499541 |
12 | 25b18990 |
13 | 1568c89b |
14 | bc24044 |
15 | 7ca401c |
hex | 553a07c |
89366652 has 84 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 246974280. Its totient is φ = 28203552.
The previous prime is 89366623. The next prime is 89366687. The reversal of 89366652 is 25666398.
It is a happy number.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 89366598 and 89366607.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 27 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 54598 + ... + 56210.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (2940170).
Almost surely, 289366652 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 89366652, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (123487140).
89366652 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (157607628).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
89366652 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
89366652 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 1654 (or 1637 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 466560, while the sum is 45.
The square root of 89366652 is about 9453.3936763471. The cubic root of 89366652 is about 447.0867810431.
The spelling of 89366652 in words is "eighty-nine million, three hundred sixty-six thousand, six hundred fifty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.000 sec. • engine limits •