Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1001110011101… |
… | …0000000010100 |
3 | 2212101201120100 |
4 | 2130322000110 |
5 | 41012211202 |
6 | 4025334100 |
7 | 1006421343 |
oct | 234720024 |
9 | 85351510 |
10 | 41132052 |
11 | 21244135 |
12 | 11937330 |
13 | 86a1bc0 |
14 | 5669b5a |
15 | 392741c |
hex | 273a014 |
41132052 has 72 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 112825440. Its totient is φ = 12559680.
The previous prime is 41132033. The next prime is 41132053. The reversal of 41132052 is 25023114.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (18).
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (41132053) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 23 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 83527 + ... + 84017.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1567020).
Almost surely, 241132052 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 41132052, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (56412720).
41132052 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (71693388).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
41132052 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
41132052 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 693 (or 688 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 240, while the sum is 18.
The square root of 41132052 is about 6413.4274767865. The cubic root of 41132052 is about 345.1915256655.
Adding to 41132052 its reverse (25023114), we get a palindrome (66155166).
The spelling of 41132052 in words is "forty-one million, one hundred thirty-two thousand, fifty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.001 sec. • engine limits •