Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 111011011110… |
… | …1110010100000 |
3 | 2011200102021000 |
4 | 1312331302200 |
5 | 30440423310 |
6 | 3032232000 |
7 | 526035342 |
oct | 166756240 |
9 | 64612230 |
10 | 31186080 |
11 | 16670622 |
12 | a53b600 |
13 | 65cbb03 |
14 | 41db292 |
15 | 2b104c0 |
hex | 1dbdca0 |
31186080 has 96 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 109166400. Its totient is φ = 8315136.
The previous prime is 31186069. The next prime is 31186097. The reversal of 31186080 is 8068113.
It is a tau number, because it is divible by the number of its divisors (96).
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (27).
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 711 + ... + 7929.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1137150).
Almost surely, 231186080 is an apocalyptic number.
31186080 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (30) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 31186080, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (54583200).
31186080 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (77980320).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
31186080 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
31186080 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 7243 (or 7229 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 1152, while the sum is 27.
The square root of 31186080 is about 5584.4498386144. The cubic root of 31186080 is about 314.7653581397.
The spelling of 31186080 in words is "thirty-one million, one hundred eighty-six thousand, eighty".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.001 sec. • engine limits •