Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1001001101110… |
… | …0101100100100 |
3 | 2200201202112210 |
4 | 2103130230210 |
5 | 34343341313 |
6 | 3500243420 |
7 | 646354053 |
oct | 223345444 |
9 | 80652483 |
10 | 38652708 |
11 | 1a900396 |
12 | 10b40570 |
13 | 8014533 |
14 | 51c239a |
15 | 35d79c3 |
hex | 24dcb24 |
38652708 has 48 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 94248000. Its totient is φ = 12313728.
The previous prime is 38652701. The next prime is 38652749. The reversal of 38652708 is 80725683.
It is a Smith number, since the sum of its digits (39) coincides with the sum of the digits of its prime factors.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (38652701) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 37423 + ... + 38441.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1963500).
Almost surely, 238652708 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 38652708, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (47124000).
38652708 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (55595292).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
38652708 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
38652708 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 1164 (or 1162 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 80640, while the sum is 39.
The square root of 38652708 is about 6217.1302061321. The cubic root of 38652708 is about 338.1115255842. Note that the first 3 decimals are identical.
The spelling of 38652708 in words is "thirty-eight million, six hundred fifty-two thousand, seven hundred eight".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.001 sec. • engine limits •