Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10111011000000… |
… | …10111100000110 |
3 | 111122222200210120 |
4 | 23230002330012 |
5 | 400200031000 |
6 | 31243002410 |
7 | 4600533504 |
oct | 1354027406 |
9 | 448880716 |
10 | 196095750 |
11 | a0766704 |
12 | 55809406 |
13 | 3181b1b6 |
14 | 1c087674 |
15 | 123376a0 |
hex | bb02f06 |
196095750 has 64 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 499958784. Its totient is φ = 51170400.
The previous prime is 196095733. The next prime is 196095761. The reversal of 196095750 is 57590691.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 31 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 32469 + ... + 38031.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (7811856).
Almost surely, 2196095750 is an apocalyptic number.
196095750 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (10) formed by its first and last digit.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 196095750, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (249979392).
196095750 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (303863034).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
196095750 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
196095750 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 5630 (or 5620 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 85050, while the sum is 42.
The square root of 196095750 is about 14003.4192253178. The cubic root of 196095750 is about 580.9731483034.
The spelling of 196095750 in words is "one hundred ninety-six million, ninety-five thousand, seven hundred fifty".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.001 sec. • engine limits •