[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Models of cancer

The OBSERVE guidelines provide refinement criteria for rodent oncology models

Subjects

A consensus statement outlines the best practices to refine animal welfare in rodent models of cancer. Their adoption will allow the standardization of experimental interventions, considering the characteristics of each cancer model, thereby improving the reproducibility and translational value of data obtained in rodents.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Refinement criteria need to consider differences between models.

References

  1. Cheleuitte-Nieves, C. & Lipman, N. S. ILAR J. 60, 113–119 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs) https://nc3rs.org.uk/who-we-are/3rs (accessed 11 April 2024).

  3. De Vleeschauwer, S. I. et al. Nat. Protoc. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-024-00998-w (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kilkenny, C., Browne, W. J., Cuthill, I. C., Emerson, M. & Altman, D. G. PLoS Biol. 8, e1000412 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith, A. J., Clutton, R. E., Lilley, E., Hansen, K. E. A. & Brattelid, T. Lab. Anim. 52, 135–141 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Peterson, N. C., Nunamaker, E. A. & Turner, P. V. Comp. Med. 67, 469–482 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Carbone, L. & Austin, J. PLoS ONE 11, e0155001 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lofgren, J. et al. Lab. Anim. 52, 351–364 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hirth, M. et al. Cells 11, 2634 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Roughan, J. V., Coulter, C. A., Flecknell, P. A., Thomas, H. D. & Sufka, K. J. PLoS ONE 9, e103362 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Taylor, D. Comp. Med. 69, 501–509 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Graber, T. G., Ferguson-Stegall, L., Kim, J. H. & Thompson, L. V. J. Gerontol. A 68, 1326–1336 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Miller, A. L. & Leach, M. C. PLoS ONE 10, e0136000 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Koch, A. et al. PLoS ONE 11, e0161079 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Mai, S. H. C. et al. Intens. Care Med. Exp. 6, 20 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amanda C. Ritter.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ritter, A.C., Cheleuitte-Nieves, C. & Lipman, N.S. The OBSERVE guidelines provide refinement criteria for rodent oncology models. Nat Protoc 19, 2831–2832 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-024-01008-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-024-01008-9

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer