About: Frey v Fedoruk

An Entity of Type: Supreme Court of the United States case, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Frey v Fedoruk [1950] S.C.R. 517 is a decision by the Supreme Court of Canada on the definition of a breach of the peace and whether being a "peeping tom" is a crime. The Court found that actions do not necessarily breach the peace just because they cause violent reactions. Due to this finding, courts would have less say in determining what is criminal as a breach of the peace, and the Parliament of Canada would have more.

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	Frey v Fedoruk [1950] S.C.R. 517 is a decision by the Supreme Court of Canada on the definition of a breach of the peace and whether being a "peeping tom" is a crime. The Court found that actions do not necessarily breach the peace just because they cause violent reactions. Due to this finding, courts would have less say in determining what is criminal as a breach of the peace, and the Parliament of Canada would have more. (en)
dbo:wikiPageID	6674449 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	4650 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	1007533961 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbr:John_Robert_Cartwright dbr:Patrick_Kerwin dbr:Lexicon dbr:Criminal_Code_(Canada) dbr:Common_law dbc:1950_in_Canadian_case_law dbr:Court_of_Appeal_for_British_Columbia dbc:Sex_laws dbr:Breach_of_the_peace dbr:British_Columbia_Court_of_Appeal dbr:Parliament_of_Canada dbr:False_imprisonment dbr:List_of_Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases_(Richards_Court_through_Fauteux_Court) dbr:Legal_burden_of_proof dbr:Revenge dbc:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases dbr:Adultery dbr:Supreme_Court_of_Canada dbr:Arrest_warrant dbr:Butcher_knife dbr:Insult dbr:Riot dbr:Imprisonment dbr:Voyeurism dbr:Police_constable
dbp:caseName	Frey v Fedoruk (en)
dbp:citations	[1950] SCR 517, 1950 CanLII 1 (en)
dbp:concurrence	Kerwin J. (en)
dbp:decidedDate	1950-04-25 (xsd:date)
dbp:fullCaseName	Bernard Frey v. Stephen Fedoruk and Richard Percy Stone (en)
dbp:heardDate	1950-02-07 (xsd:date)
dbp:history	Judgement for Fedoruk in the Court of Appeal for British Columbia (en)
dbp:joinmajority	Rinfret C.J., Taschereau, Rand, Kellock, and Locke JJ. (en)
dbp:majority	Cartwright J. (en)
dbp:ratio	Imprisonment in this case failed to be justified since peeping was not a recognized crime. (en)
dbp:scc	1949 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Infobox_SCC dbt:Lexum-scc2
dcterms:subject	dbc:1950_in_Canadian_case_law dbc:Sex_laws dbc:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases
gold:hypernym	dbr:Decision
rdf:type	yago:WikicatSexLaws yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Collection107951464 yago:Group100031264 yago:Law108441203 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
rdfs:comment	Frey v Fedoruk [1950] S.C.R. 517 is a decision by the Supreme Court of Canada on the definition of a breach of the peace and whether being a "peeping tom" is a crime. The Court found that actions do not necessarily breach the peace just because they cause violent reactions. Due to this finding, courts would have less say in determining what is criminal as a breach of the peace, and the Parliament of Canada would have more. (en)
rdfs:label	Frey v Fedoruk (en)
owl:sameAs	freebase:Frey v Fedoruk yago-res:Frey v Fedoruk wikidata:Frey v Fedoruk https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4jjxQ
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Frey_v_Fedoruk?oldid=1007533961&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Frey_v_Fedoruk
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of	dbr:Frey_v._Fedoruk_et_al. dbr:Frey_v._Fedoruk
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:Frey_v._Fedoruk_et_al. dbr:List_of_Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases_(Richards_Court_through_Fauteux_Court) dbr:Frey_v._Fedoruk
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Frey_v_Fedoruk