[go: up one dir, main page]
create a website
Micro-econometric approaches to the evaluation of technology-oriented public programmes: a non-technical review of the state of the art. (2013). Arvanitis, Spyros.
In: Chapters.
RePEc:elg:eechap:14384_3.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 3

Citations received by this document

Cites: 69

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Beyond the average effect of the innovation subsidies: Using case selection via matching to break impasse in delivering useful advice to policy makers. (2024). Skorska, Paulina ; Krupnik, Seweryn ; Koniewski, Maciej.
    In: Evaluation and Program Planning.
    RePEc:eee:epplan:v:104:y:2024:i:c:s0149718924000314.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Sectors and the additionality effects of R&D tax credits: A cross-country microeconometric analysis. (2017). Vezzulli, Andrea ; Fontana, Roberto ; Castellacci, Fulvio ; Bodas Freitas, Isabel Maria ; Malerba, Franco.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:46:y:2017:i:1:p:57-72.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. The impact of public support on firm propensity to engage in R&D: Spanish experience. (2016). Huergo, Elena ; Trenado, Mayte ; Ubierna, Andrs .
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:113:y:2016:i:pb:p:206-219.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Aerts, K. and T. Schmidt (2008), ‘Two for the price of one? Additionality effects of R&D subsidies: a comparison between Flanders and Germany’, Research Policy, 37, 895–22.

  2. Almus, M. and D. Czarnitzki (2003), ‘The effects of public R&D subsidies on firms’ innovation activities: the case of Eastern Germany’, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 21, 226–36.

  3. Arrow, K.J. (1962), ‘Economic welfare and the allocation of resources to invention’, in R. Nelson (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp.609–26.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Arvanitis, S. and M. Keilbach (2002), ‘Evaluation methodologies, econometric models: micro-econometric models’, in W. Polt, J. Rojo, A. Tübke, G. Fahrenkrog and K.Zinöcker M3057 - LINK TEXT.indd 85 M3057 - LINK TEXT.indd 85 24/01/2013 09:56 24/01/2013 09:56 Albert N. Link and Nicholas S. Vonortas - 9780857932396 Downloaded from Elgar Online at 09/26/2016 03:29:31AM via CitEc (NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION, SHARING or POSTING) The theory and practice of program evaluation (eds), RTD Evaluation Tool Box: Socio-Economic Evaluation of Public RTD Policies (EPUB), Vienna: European Commission, pp.101–18.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  5. Arvanitis, S., H. Hollenstein and S. Lenz (2002), ‘The effectiveness of government promotion of advanced manufacturing technologies (AMT): an economic analysis based on Swiss micro data?’, Small Business Economics, 19(4), 321–40.

  6. Arvanitis, S., L. Donzé and N. Sydow (2010), ‘Impact of Swiss technology policy on firm innovation performance: an evaluation based on a matching approach’, Science and Public Policy, 37(1), 63–78.

  7. Aschhoff, B., A. Fier and H. Löhlein (2006), ‘Detecting behavioural additionality – an empirical study on the impact of public R&D funding on firms’ cooperative behaviour in Germany’, ZEW Discussion Paper No. 06-037, Mannheim.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  8. Bérubé, C. and P. Mohnen (2009), ‘Are firms that received R&D subsidies more innovative?’, Canadian Journal of Economics, 422, 206–25.

  9. Baghana, R. (2010), ‘Public R&D subsidies and productivity: evidence from firm-level data in Quebec’, UNU-MERIT Working Paper Series No. 2010-055, Maastricht.

  10. Baghana, R. and P. Mohnen (2009), ‘Effectiveness of R&D tax incentives in small and large enterprises in Québec’, Small Business Economics, 33, 91–107.

  11. Bayona-Saez, C. and T. Garcia-Marco (2010), ‘Assessing the effectiveness of the eureka programme’, Research Policy, 39, 1375–86.

  12. Benfratello, L. and A. Sembenelli (2002), ‘Research joint ventures and firm level performance ’, Research Policy, 31, 493–507.

  13. Bloom, N., R. Griffith and J. Van Reenen (2002), ‘Do R&D tax credits work? Evidence from a panel of countries 1979–1997’, Journal of Public Economics, 85, 1–31.

  14. Branstetter, L. and M. Sakakibara (2002), ‘When do research consortia work well and why? Evidence from Japanese panel data’, American Economic Review, 92(1), 143–59.

  15. Busom, I. (2000), ‘An evaluation of the effects of R&D subsidies’, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 9, 111–48.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  16. Caliendo, M. and S. Kopeinig (2008), ‘Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching’, Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(1), 31–72.

  17. Cappelen, Ä., A. Raknerud and M. Rybalka (2012), ‘The effects of R&D tax credits on patenting and innovations’, Research Policy, 41, 334–45.

  18. Carboni, O.A. (2011), ‘R&D subsidies and private R&D expenditures: evidence from Italian manufacturing firms’, International Review of Applied Economics, 25(4), 419–39.

  19. Cerulli, G. (2008), ‘Modelling and measuring the effect of pubic subsidies on business R&D: theoretical and econometric issues’, CERIS-CNR Working Paper No. 3/2008, Rome.

  20. Cerulli, G. (2010), ‘Modelling and measuring the effect of public subsidies on business R&D: a critical review of the econometric literature’, Economic Record, 86(274), 421–49.

  21. Cerulli, G. and B. Poti (2008), ‘Evaluating the effect of public subsidies on firm R&D activity: an application to Italy using the community innovation survey’, CERIS-CNR Working Paper No. 9/2008, Rome.

  22. Cornet, M., B. Vroomen and M. van der Steeg (2006), ‘Do innovation vouchers help SMEs to cross the bridge towards science?’, CBS Discussion Paper No. 58, The Hague.

  23. Czarnitzki, D. and A. Fier (2002), ‘Do innovation subsidies crowd out private investment ? Evidence from the German service sector’, ZEW Discussion Paper No. 02-04, Mannheim.

  24. Czarnitzki, D. and C. Lopez Bento (2010), ‘Evaluation of public R&D policies: a crosscountry comparison’, ZEW Discussion Paper No. 10-073, Mannheim.

  25. Czarnitzki, D., B. Ebersberger and A. Fier (2007), ‘The relationship between R&D collaboration subsidies and R&D performance: empirical evidence from Finland and Germany’, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22, 1347–66.

  26. Czarnitzki, D., P. Hanel and J.M. Rosa (2011), ‘Evaluating the impact of R&D tax credits on innovation: a micro-econometric study on Canadian firms’, Research Policy, 40, 217–29.

  27. David, P., B. Hall and A. Toole (2000), ‘Is public R&D a complement for private R&D?’, Research Policy, 29, 497–529.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  28. Duguet, E. (2004), ‘Are R&D subsidies a substitute or a complement to privately funded R&D?’, Revue d’Économie Politique, 114(2), 245–94.

  29. Elschner, C., C. Ernst, G. Licht and C. Spengel (2011), ‘What the design of an R&D tax incentive tells about its effectiveness: a simulation of R&D tax incentives in the European Union’, Journal of Technology Transfer, 36, 233–56.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  30. Falk, R. (2007), ‘Measuring the effects of public support schemes on firms’ innovation activities – survey evidence from Austria’, Research Policy, 36, 665–79.

  31. Görg, H. and E. Strobl (2007), ‘The effect of R&D subsidies on private R&D’, Economica, 74, 215–34.

  32. Gabriele, R., M. Zamarian and E. Zaminotto (2006), ‘Assessing the economic impact of public industrial policies: an empirical investigation on subsidies’, DISA, Universita Degli Studi di Trento, Trento.

  33. Garcia-Quevado, G. (2004), ‘Do public subsidies complement business R&D? A metaanalysis of the econometric evidence’, Kyklos, 57, 87–102.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Gelabert, L., A. Fosfuri and J.A. Tribo (2009), ‘Does the effect of public support for R&Ddepend on the degree of appropriability?’, Journal of Industrial Economics, 58(4), 736–67.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  35. Girma, S., H. Görg and E. Strobl (2007), ‘The effects of government grants on plant survival. A micro-econometric analysis’, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 25, 701–20.

  36. Gonzalez, X. and C. Pazo (2008), ‘Do public subsidies stimulate private R&D spending?’, Research Policy, 37, 371–89.

  37. Griliches, Z. (1979), ‘Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth’, Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 92–116.

  38. Guellec, D. and B. Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie (2000), ‘The impact of public R&D expenditure on business R&D’, STI Working Papers 2000/4, Paris: OECD.

  39. Hall, B.H. (2002), ‘The financing of research and development’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(1), 35–51.

  40. Hall, B.H. and J. Van Reenen (2000), ‘How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D? A review of the evidence’, Research Policy, 29, 449–69.

  41. Heckman, J. (1979), ‘Sample selection bias as a specification error’, Econometrica, 47, 153–61.

  42. Heckman, J., H. Ichimura, J. Smith and P. Todd (1998), ‘Characterizing selection bias using experimental data’, Econometrica, 66(5), 1017–98.

  43. Hussinger, K. (2008), ‘R&D subsidies at the firm level: an application of parametric and semi-parametric two-step selection models’, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23, 729–47.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  44. Imbens, G.W. and J.M. Woodridge (2009), ‘Recent developments in the econometrics of programme evaluation’, Journal of Economic Literature, 47(1), 5–86.

  45. Jacobs, O.H. and C. Spengel (1996), European Tax Analyzer, Baden-Baden: Nomos.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  46. Jaffe, A.B. (2002), ‘Building programme evaluation into the design of public researchsupport programmes’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(1), 22–34.

  47. Jaumotte, F. and N. Pain (2005), ‘An overview of public policies to support innovation’, OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 456, Paris.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Kaiser, U. (2006), ‘Private R&D and public R&D subsidies: microeconomic evidence from Denmark’, Danish Journal of Economics, 144(1), 1–17.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  49. Kaiser, U. and J.M. Kuhn (2011), ‘Long-run effects of public–private research joint ventures: the case of the Danish innovation consortia support scheme’, IZA Discussion Paper No. 5986, Bonn.

  50. Klette, T.J., J. Moen and Z. Griliches (2000), ‘Do subsidies to commercial R&D reduce market failures? Micro-econometric evaluation studies’, Research Policy, 29, 471–95.

  51. Lööf, H. and A. Hesmati (2005), ‘The impact of public funding on private R&D investment. New evidence from a firm level innovation study’, CESIS Electronic Working Paper Series No. 06, The Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Lach, S. (2002), ‘Do R&D subsidies stimulate or displace private R&D?’, Journal of International Business Studies, 30, 1–24.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. M3057 - LINK TEXT.indd 86 M3057 - LINK TEXT.indd 86 24/01/2013 09:56 24/01/2013 09:56 Albert N. Link and Nicholas S. Vonortas - 9780857932396 Downloaded from Elgar Online at 09/26/2016 03:29:31AM via CitEc (NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION, SHARING or POSTING) Evaluation of technology-oriented public programmes 87 Donzé, L. (2002), ‘Matched-pair analysis based on business survey data to evaluate the policy of supporting the adoption of advanced manufacturing technologies by Swiss firms’, KOF Working Paper No. 65, Zurich.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. M3057 - LINK TEXT.indd 87 M3057 - LINK TEXT.indd 87 24/01/2013 09:56 24/01/2013 09:56 Albert N. Link and Nicholas S. Vonortas - 9780857932396 Downloaded from Elgar Online at 09/26/2016 03:29:31AM via CitEc (NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION, SHARING or POSTING) The theory and practice of program evaluation Lee, C-Y. (2011), ‘The differential effects of public R&D support on firm R&D: theory and evidence from multi-country data’, Technovation, 31, 256–69.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. M3057 - LINK TEXT.indd 88 M3057 - LINK TEXT.indd 88 24/01/2013 09:56 24/01/2013 09:56 Albert N. Link and Nicholas S. Vonortas - 9780857932396 Downloaded from Elgar Online at 09/26/2016 03:29:31AM via CitEc (NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION, SHARING or POSTING)
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Mairesse, J. and B. Mulkay (2004), ‘Une evaluation du Crédit d’Impôt Recherche en France 1980–1997’, Série des Documents se Travail du CREST No. 2004-43, Paris: INSEE.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  57. Martin, S. and J.T. Scott (2000), ‘The nature of innovation market failure and the design of public support for private innovation’, Research Policy, 29, 437–47.

  58. Matt, M., S. Robin and S. Wolff (2011), ‘The influence of public programmes on inter-firm R&D collaboration strategies: project-level evidence from EU FP5 and FP6’, Journal of Technology Transfer, published online 15 September.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Mohnen, P. and B. Lokshin (2007), ‘Measuring the effectiveness of R&D tax credits in the Netherlands’, UNU-MERIT Working Paper Series No. 2007-025, Maastricht.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  60. Mohnen, P. and B. Lokshin (2009), ‘What does it take for an R&D tax incentive policy to be effective?’, UNU-MERIT Working Paper Series No. 2009-014, Maastricht.

  61. Nelson, R.R. (1959), ‘The simple economics of basic scientific research’, Journal of Political Economy, 67, 297–306.

  62. Piekolla, H. (2007), ‘Public funding of R&D and growth: firm-level evidence for Finland’, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16(3), 195–210.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. Pointner, W. and C. Rammer (2005), ‘Wirkungsanalyse’, in W. Pointner and W. Polt (eds), Diffusionsorientierte Technologiepolitik – Eine vergleichende Wirkungsanalyse für Österreich, die Schweiz, Deutschland und die USA, Vienna: Leykam, pp.67–108.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. Rosenbaum, B.R. and D.B. Rubin (1983), ‘The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects’, Biometrika, 70, 41–55.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  65. Rubin, D.B. (1974), ‘Estimating causal effects for treatment in randomized and nonrandomized studies’, Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 688–701.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  66. Smith, J. and P. Todd (2005), ‘Does matching overcome Lalonde’s critique of nonexperimental estimators?’, Journal of Econometrics, 125, 305–53.

  67. Streicher, G. (2007), ‘Additionality of FFG funding’, InTeReg Working Paper No. 49-2007, Vienna.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  68. Wallsten, S.C. (2000), ‘The effects of government-industry R&D programmes on private R&D: the case of the small business innovation research programme’, Rand Journal of Economics, 31(1), 82–100.

  69. Wilson, D. (2009), ‘Beggar thy neighbour? The in-state, out-state and aggregate effects of R&D tax credits’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(2), 431–6.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Does government support for private innovation matter? Firm-level evidence from two catching-up countries. (2017). Tandoğan, Vedat ; Szczygielski, Krzysztof ; Pamukçu, Mehmet ; Grabowski, Wojciech ; Tandogan, Vedat Sinan ; Pamukcu, Mehmet Teoman .
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:46:y:2017:i:1:p:219-237.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Geographical clustering and the effectiveness of public innovation programs. (2016). Rammer, Christian ; Crass, Dirk ; Aschhoff, Birgit .
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:16083.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. The contribution of different public innovation funding programs to SMEs export performance. (2016). Rammer, Christian ; Liu, Rebecca .
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:16078.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Explaining firm sensitivity to R&D subsidies within a dose-response model: The role of financial constraints, real cost of investment, and strategic value of R&D. (2016). Cerulli, Giovanni ; Poti, Bianca .
    In: DEM Working Papers.
    RePEc:trn:utwprg:2016/09.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Firm Subsidies and the Innovation Output: What Can We Learn by Looking at Multiple Investment Inputs?. (2016). Sembenelli, Alessandro ; Cosconati, Marco .
    In: Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti.
    RePEc:spr:italej:v:2:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s40797-015-0025-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Long run effect of public grants on the R&D investment: A non-stationary panel data approach. (2016). Kao, Chihwa ; Álvarez, Inmaculada ; Alvarez, Inmaculada C ; Romero-Jordan, Desiderio.
    In: Efficiency Series Papers.
    RePEc:oeg:wpaper:2016/04.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. The impact of public support on firm propensity to engage in R&D: Spanish experience. (2016). Huergo, Elena ; Trenado, Mayte ; Ubierna, Andrs .
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:113:y:2016:i:pb:p:206-219.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. University–industry collaboration and firms’ R&D effort. (2016). Scandura, Alessandra.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:45:y:2016:i:9:p:1907-1922.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. The allocation and effectiveness of China’s R&D subsidies - Evidence from listed firms. (2016). Boeing, Philipp.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:45:y:2016:i:9:p:1774-1789.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Additionality or crowding-out? An overall evaluation of public R&D subsidy on private R&D expenditure. (2016). Parrotta, Pierpaolo ; Lhuillery, Stephane ; Sala, Davide ; Marino, Marianna.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:45:y:2016:i:9:p:1715-1730.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Government-subsidized R&D and firm innovation: Evidence from China. (2016). Guo, Di ; Jiang, Kun.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:45:y:2016:i:6:p:1129-1144.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Radical or incremental: Where does R&D policy hit?. (2016). Schenker-Wicki, Andrea ; Lopes-Bento, Cindy ; Beck, Mathias .
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:45:y:2016:i:4:p:869-883.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Bridging science and technology through academic–industry partnerships. (2016). Chai, Sen ; Shih, Willy .
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:45:y:2016:i:1:p:148-158.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Public subsidies for SME research and development: Empirical evaluation of collaborative versus individual place-based programs. (2016). Zazzaro, Alberto ; Pennacchio, Luca ; Bellucci, Andrea.
    In: Mo.Fi.R. Working Papers.
    RePEc:anc:wmofir:133.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Impact Evaluation of the Brazilian crop insurance public program “Proagro Mais”. (2016). BRAVO-URETA, BORIS ; Oate, Carlos Andres ; Ozaki, Vitor Augusto .
    In: 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts.
    RePEc:ags:aaea16:236096.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. R&D subsidies and firms cost of debt. (2015). Hottenrott, Hanna ; Demeulemeester, Sarah.
    In: DICE Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:dicedp:201.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. The Role of Firm RD Effort and Collaboration as Mediating Drivers of Innovation Policy Effectiveness. (2015). POTI, Bianca ; Gabriele, Roberto ; Cerulli, Giovanni.
    In: DEM Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:trn:utwpem:2015/01.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. UK and EU subsidies and private R&D investment: Is there input additionality?. (2015). Ugur, Mehmet ; Solomon, Edna ; Trushin, Eshref.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:68009.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Demand-side vs. supply-side technology policies: Hidden treatment and new empirical evidence on the policy mix. (2015). Raiteri, Emilio ; Guerzoni, Marco.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:44:y:2015:i:3:p:726-747.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Can R&D subsidies counteract the economic crisis? – Macroeconomic effects in Germany. (2015). Nulsch, Nicole ; Ludwig, Udo ; Brautzsch, Hans-Ulrich ; Loose, Brigitte ; Gunther, Jutta.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:44:y:2015:i:3:p:623-633.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. The impact of R&D subsidies during the crisis. (2015). Hussinger, Katrin ; Hud, Martin.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:44:y:2015:i:10:p:1844-1855.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Radical or incremental: Where does R&D policy hit?. (2014). Schenker-Wicki, Andrea ; Beck, Mathias ; Lopes-Bento, Cindy .
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:14106.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Staging innovation projects: (when) does it pay off?. (2014). Hünermund, Paul ; Hunermund, Paul ; Andries, Petra .
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:14091.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. The impact of R&D subsidies during the crisis. (2014). Hussinger, Katrin ; Hud, Martin.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:14024.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. The Effects of the Government Research and Development Support Policies on the Local Firms Innovative Performance. (2014). Cho, Deokho ; Choi, Kyung Hee.
    In: ERSA conference papers.
    RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa14p6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. ROMANIA’S R&D AND INNOVATION POTENTIAL AT EU LEVEL AND THE MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS FOR SMEs. (2014). LAVRIC, Victor .
    In: Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE.
    RePEc:rom:mancon:v:8:y:2014:i:1:p:718-726.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. The impact of R&D subsidies on R&D employment composition. (2014). Garcia-Quevedo, Jose ; Afcha, Sergio.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ieb:wpaper:2013/6/doc2014-22.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. The impact of technology intermediaries on firm cognitive capacity additionality. (2014). Spithoven, Andre ; Knockaert, Mirjam ; Clarysse, Bart.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:81:y:2014:i:c:p:376-387.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. (International) R&D collaboration and SMEs: The effectiveness of targeted public R&D support schemes. (2014). Hottenrott, Hanna ; Lopes-Bento, Cindy .
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:43:y:2014:i:6:p:1055-1066.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. A dynamic auction for multi-object procurement under a hard budget constraint. (2014). Giebe, Thomas ; Ensthaler, Ludwig .
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:43:y:2014:i:1:p:179-189.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Crowding-in of complementary contributions to public goods: Firm investment into open source software. (2014). Thomes, Tim ; Ressner, Ludwig ; Schmidtke, Richard ; Reisinger, Markus.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:106:y:2014:i:c:p:78-94.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Absorptive capacity from foreign direct investment in Spanish manufacturing firms. (2014). Rosell-Martinez, Jorge ; Sanchez-Sellero, Pedro ; Garcia-Vazquez, Jose Manuel .
    In: International Business Review.
    RePEc:eee:iburev:v:23:y:2014:i:2:p:429-439.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Evaluation of Public R&D Policy: A Meta-Regression Analysis. (2014). SATTIN, JEAN-FRANCOIS ; Negassi, Syoum .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:dlw:wpaper:14-09..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. (International) R&D collaboration and SMEs: The effectiveness of targeted public R&D support schemes. (2013). Hottenrott, Hanna ; Lopes-Bento, Cindy .
    In: DICE Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:dicedp:121.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Does Government Support for Private Innovation Matter? Firm-Level Evidence from Turkey and Poland. (2013). Tandoğan, Vedat ; Szczygielski, Krzysztof ; Pamukçu, Mehmet ; Grabowski, Wojciech ; Pamukcu, Teoman ; Tandogan, Sinan .
    In: CASE Network Studies and Analyses.
    RePEc:sec:cnstan:0458.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. THE DYNAMICS OF R&D HUMAN RESOURCES IN ROMANIA WITHIN THE EUROPEAN CONTEXT. (2013). LAVRIC, Victor .
    In: Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE.
    RePEc:rom:mancon:v:7:y:2013:i:1:p:259-267.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. HIGHLY IMPORTANT OBJECTIVES FOR INNOVATION IN ROMANIA WITHIN THE EUROPEAN CONTEXT. (2013). Victor, Lavric ; Ion, Popa .
    In: Annals of Faculty of Economics.
    RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2013:i:1:p:1588-1594.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. The Determinants of R&D Investment: A Survey of the Empirical Research. (2013). Becker, Bettina.
    In: Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:lbo:lbowps:2013_09.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Innovation panel surveys in Germany. (2013). Peters, Bettina ; Rammer, Christian.
    In: Chapters.
    RePEc:elg:eechap:14427_6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Micro-econometric approaches to the evaluation of technology-oriented public programmes: a non-technical review of the state of the art. (2013). Arvanitis, Spyros.
    In: Chapters.
    RePEc:elg:eechap:14384_3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Value for money? New microeconometric evidence on public R&D grants in Flanders. (2013). Czarnitzki, Dirk ; Lopes-Bento, Cindy .
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:42:y:2013:i:1:p:76-89.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. MANAGERIAL METHODS STIMULATING NEW IDEAS OR CREATIVITY IN ROMANIA WIHIN THE EUROPEAN CONTEXT. (2013). Victor, Lavric ; Ion, Popa .
    In: Revista Economica.
    RePEc:blg:reveco:v:65:y:2013:i:6:p:128-138.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. R&D INCENTIVES: THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A PLACE-BASED POLICY. (2012). Giunta, Anna ; Gabriele, Roberto.
    In: Departmental Working Papers of Economics - University 'Roma Tre'.
    RePEc:rtr:wpaper:0169.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. THE DYNAMICS OF R&D ACTIVITIES IN ROMANIA WITHIN THE EUROPEAN CONTEXT. (2012). LAVRIC, Victor .
    In: Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE.
    RePEc:rom:mancon:v:6:y:2012:i:1:p:648-654.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. (International) R&D Collaboration and SMEs: The effectiveness of targeted public R&D support schemes. (2012). Hottenrott, Hanna ; Cindy, LOPES BENTO .
    In: LISER Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:irs:cepswp:2012-36.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Do financial constraints threat the innovation process? Evidence from Portuguese firms. (2011). Silva, Filipe ; Carreira, Carlos.
    In: GEMF Working Papers.
    RePEc:gmf:wpaper:2011-10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Using Innovation Surveys for Econometric Analysis. (2010). Mohnen, Pierre ; MAIRESSE, Jacques.
    In: MERIT Working Papers.
    RePEc:unm:unumer:2010023.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Using Innovations Surveys for Econometric Analysis. (2010). Mohnen, Pierre ; MAIRESSE, Jacques.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:15857.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Government R&D subsidies as a signal for private investors. (2010). Kleer, Robin .
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:39:y:2010:i:10:p:1361-1374.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Using Innovation Surveys for Econometric Analysis. (2010). Mairesse, Jacques ; Mohnen, Pierre.
    In: Handbook of the Economics of Innovation.
    RePEc:eee:haechp:v2_1129.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2024-12-21 10:51:46 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.