[go: up one dir, main page]
create a website
Costs, benefits, and the malleability of public support for “Fracking”. (2017). Christenson, Dino P ; Kriner, Douglas L ; Goldfarb, Jillian L.
In: Energy Policy.
RePEc:eee:enepol:v:105:y:2017:i:c:p:407-417.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 7

Citations received by this document

Cites: 100

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. U.S. public support for biofuels tax credits: Cost frames, local fuel prices, and the moderating influence of partisanship. (2021). Kriner, Douglas L ; Goldfarb, Jillian L.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:149:y:2021:i:c:s0301421520308090.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Social Influence, Risk and Benefit Perceptions, and the Acceptability of Risky Energy Technologies: An Explanatory Model of Nuclear Power Versus Shale Gas. (2020). Judith, ; Schubert, Iljana ; Schweiger, Elisa.
    In: Risk Analysis.
    RePEc:wly:riskan:v:40:y:2020:i:6:p:1226-1243.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Energy systems for climate change mitigation: A systematic review. (2020). Wei, Yi-Ming ; Wang, Jin-Wei ; Yu, Bi-Ying ; Han, Rong ; Liu, Lan-Cui ; Kang, Jia-Ning.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:263:y:2020:i:c:s0306261920301148.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Cultural Values, Trust, and Benefit‐Risk Perceptions of Hydraulic Fracturing: A Comparative Analysis of Policy Elites and the General Public. (2019). Song, Geoboo ; Tumlison, Creed.
    In: Risk Analysis.
    RePEc:wly:riskan:v:39:y:2019:i:3:p:511-534.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Public opinion toward hydraulic fracturing: The effect of beyond compliance and voluntary third-party certification. (2019). Rupp, John ; Clark, Ashley ; Le, Michel ; Graham, John D ; Wietelman, Derek C.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:128:y:2019:i:c:p:306-315.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Korean perceptions of transboundary air pollution and domestic coal development: Two framing experiments. (2019). Bolsen, Toby ; Shapiro, Matthew A.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:126:y:2019:i:c:p:333-342.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Public perceptions of energy policies: Predicting support, opposition, and nonsubstantive responses. (2018). Edwards, Michelle L.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:117:y:2018:i:c:p:348-357.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Aklin, M. ; Urpelainen, J. Debating clean energy: frames, counter Frames, and audiences. 2013 Glob. Environ. Change. 23 1225-1232
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. API (American Petroleum Institute), 2016. Facts About Shale Gas. 〈http://www.api.org/oil-and-natural-gas/wells-to-consumer/exploration-and-production/hydraulic-fracturing/facts-about-shale-gas〉 Retrieved 12 December 2016.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Bartels, L.M. Beyond the running tally: partisan bias in political perceptions. 2002 Polit. Behav.. 24 117-150
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Bolsen, T. ; Druckman, J.N. Counteracting the politicization of science. 2015 J. Commun.. 65 745-769
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Bolsen, T. ; Druckman, J.N. ; Cook, F.L. How frames can undermine support for scientific adaptations: politicization and the status-quo bias. 2014 Public Opin. Q.. 78 1-26
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Bolsen, T. ; Druckman, J.N. ; Cook, F.L. The influence of partisan motivated reasoning on public opinion. 2014 Polit. Behav.. 36 235-262
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Borick, C.P. ; Clarke, C. American views on fracking. 2016 Issues Energy Environ. Policy. 28 1-9
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Boudet, H. ; Bugden, D. ; Zanocco, C. ; Maibach, E. The effect of industry activities on public support for ‘fracking’. 2016 Environ. Polit.. 25 593-612
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  9. Boudet, H. ; Clarke, C. ; Bugden, D. ; Maibach, E. ; Roser-Renouf, C. ; Leiserowitz, A. “Fracking” controversy and communication: using national survey data to understand public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing. 2014 Energy Policy. 65 57-67

  10. Boudreau, C. ; MacKenzie, S.A. Informing the electorate? How party cues and policy information affect public opinion about initiatives. 2014 Am. J. Polit. Sci.. 58 48-62

  11. Bullock, J.G. Elite influence on public opinion in an informed electorate. 2011 Am. Polit. Sci. Rev.. 105 496-515

  12. Buttel, F.H. ; McMichael, P. New Directions in the Sociology of Global Development. 2005 Emerald Group Publishing Limited: Bingley, UK
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Cama, T. Trump rattles industry with fracking position. 2016 Hill. -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Campbell, A. ; Converse, P.E. ; Miller, W.E. ; Stokes, D.E. The American Voter. 1960 John Wiley and Sons: New York
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Carpini, M.X.D. ; Keeter, S. What Americans Know About Politics and Why it Matters. 1997 Yale University Press: New Haven, CT
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  16. Chong, D. ; Druckman, J.N. Dynamic public opinion: communication effects over time. 2010 Am. Polit. Sci. Rev.. 104 663-680

  17. Chong, D. ; Druckman, J.N. Framing theory. 2007 Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci.. 10 103-126
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Christenson, D.P. ; Kriner, D.L. Constitutional qualms or politics as usual? The factors shaping public support for unilateral action. 2016 Am. J. Polit. Sci.. -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  19. Clarke, C.E. ; Hart, P.S. ; Schuldt, J.P. ; Evensen, D.T. ; Boudet, H.S. ; Jacquet, J.B. ; Stedman, R.C. Public opinion on energy development: the interplay of issue framing, top-of-mind associations, and political ideology. 2015 Energy Policy. 81 131-140

  20. Colborn, T. ; Kwiatkowski, C. ; Schultz, K. ; Bachran, M. Natural gas operations from a public health perspective. 2011 Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess.: Int. J.. 17 1039-1056
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Davenport, C. Judge blocks Obama administration rules on fracking. 2015 N. Y. Times. -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  22. Davis, C. The politics of “fracking”: regulating natural gas drilling practices in Colorado and Texas. 2012 Rev. Policy Res.. 29 177-191

  23. Davis, C. ; Fisk, J.M. Energy abundance or environmental worries? Analyzing public support for fracking in the united states. 2014 Rev. Policy Res.. 31 1-16

  24. Davis, C. ; Hoffer, K. Federalizing energy? Agenda change and the politics of fracking. 2012 Policy Sci.. 45 221-241

  25. Deryugina, T. ; Shurchkov, O. The effect of information provision on public consensus about climate change. 2016 PLoS One. 11 e0151469-

  26. Dews, F. The economic benefits of fracking. 2015 Brookings Institute:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Druckman, J. ; Bolsen, T. Framing, motivated reasoning, and opinions about emerging technologies. 2011 J. Commun.. 61 659-688
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  28. Druckman, J.N. ; Peterson, E. ; Slothuus, R. How elite partisan polarization affects public opinion formation. 2013 Am. Polit. Sci. Rev.. 107 57-79

  29. Dunlap, R.E. ; McCright, A.M. A widening gap: republican and democratic views on climate change. 2008 Environ.: Sci. Policy Sustain. Dev.. 50 26-35
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Dunlap, R.E. ; McCright, A.M. ; Yarosh, J.H. The political divide on climate change: partisan polarization widens in the US. 2016 Environ.: Sci. Policy Sustain. Dev.. 58 4-23
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. EPA, Assessment of the Potential Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing for Oil and Gas on Drinking Water Resources (external review draft). 2015 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Evensen, D. ; Jacquet, J.B. ; Clarke, C.E. ; Stedman, R.C. What's the ‘fracking’ problem? One word can’t say it all. 2014 Extr. Ind. Soc.. 1 130-136
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  33. Farrell, J. Politics: echo chambers and false certainty. 2015 Nat. Clim. Change. 5 719-720

  34. Fischetti, M. The drillers are coming. 2010 Sci. Am.. 303 82-85
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Force, J.E. ; Machlis, G.E. ; Zhang, L. ; Kearney, A. The relationship between timber production, local historical events, and community social change: a quantitative case study. 1993 For. Sci.. 39 722-742
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  36. Gerber, A.S. ; Huber, G.A. Partisanship, political control, and economic assessments. 2010 Am. J. Polit. Sci.. 54 153-173

  37. Goad, B. “Wyden: ‘fracking’ rule must include public safeguards. 2013 Hill. -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  38. Goldfarb, J.L. ; Buessing, M. ; Kriner, D.L. Geographic proximity to coal plants and US public support for extending the production tax credit. 2016 Energy Policy. 99 299-307

  39. Guber, D.L. A cooling climate for change? Party polarization and the politics of global warming. 2012 Am. Behav. Sci.. -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Hart, P. Sol. ; Nisbet, E.C. Boomerang effects in science communication: how motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies. 2012 Commun. Res.. 39 701-723
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  41. Hausman, C. ; Kellogg, R. Welfare and Distributional Implications of Shale Gas. 2015 National Bureau of Economic Research: Cambridge, MA

  42. Helman, C. President Obama gets it: fracking is awesome. 2013 Forbes. -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  43. Howarth, R.W. ; Ingraffea, A. ; Engelder, T. Natural gas: should fracking stop?. 2011 Nature. 477 271-275

  44. Humphrey, C.R., Berardi, G., Carroll, M.S., Fairfax, S., Fortmann, L., Geisler, C., Johnson, J.G., Kusel, J., Lee, R.G., Macinko, S., Peluso, N.L., Schulman, M.L., West, P.C., 1993. Theories in the study of Natural Resource-Dependent Communities and Persistent Rural Poverty in the United States. In: Rural Sociological Society Task Force on Persistent Rural Poverty (ed.), Persistent Poverty in Rural America, Westview, Boulder, CO, 136–172.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Israel, A.L. ; Wong-Parodi, G. ; Webler, T. ; Stern, P.C. Eliciting public concerns about an emerging energy technology: the case of unconventional shale gas development in the united states. 2015 Energy Res. Soc. Sci.. 8 139-150
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Jackson, R.B. ; Vengosh, A. ; Carey, J.W. ; Davies, R.J. ; Darrah, T.H. ; O'Sullivan, F. ; Pétron, G. The environmental costs and benefits of fracking. 2014 Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour.. 39 327-362
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Jacquet, J. Energy boomtowns & natural gas: implications for Marcellus Shale local governments & rural communities. 2009 NERCRD Rural Dev.. 30 59-78
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Jacquet, J.B. Review of risks to communities from shale energy development. 2014 Environ. Sci. Technol.. 48 8321-8333
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  49. Jasny, L. ; Waggle, J. ; Fisher, D.R. An empirical examination of echo chambers in US climate policy networks. 2015 Nat. Clim. Change. 5 782-786

  50. Kahan, D.M. Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection. 2013 Judgm. Decis. Mak.. 8 407-424

  51. Kahan, D.M. ; Corbin, J.C. A note on the perverse effects of actively open-minded thinking on climate-change polarization. 2016 Res. Polit.. 3 1-5
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Kamieniecki, S. Political parties and environmental policy. 1995 En : Lester, J.P. Environmental Politics and Policy: Theories and Evidence. Duke University Press: Durham, NC
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Kaplan, S. Obama official urges scientists to “fight disinformation” under Trump. 2016 Wash. Post. -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  54. Kinnaman, T. The economic impact of shale gas extraction: a review of existing studies. 2011 Ecol. Econ.. 70 1243-1249

  55. Kraft, P.W. ; Lodge, M. ; Taber, C.S. Why people “Don’t trust the evidence”: motivated reasoning and scientific beliefs. 2015 Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci.. 658 121-133
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Krosnick, J.A. ; Holbrook, A.L. ; Visser, P.S. The impact of the fall 1997 debate about global warming on American public opinion. 2000 Public Underst. Sci.. 9 239-260
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  57. Krupnick, A.J. ; Gordon, H.G. What experts say about the environmental risks of shale gas development. 2015 Agric. Resour. Econ. Rev.. 44 106-119

  58. Kuklinski, J.H. ; Hurley, N.L. On hearing and interpreting political messages: a cautionary tale of citizen cue-taking. 1994 J. Polit.. 56 729-751
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  59. Lau, R.R. ; Redlawsk, D.P. Voting correctly. 1997 Am. Polit. Sci. Rev.. 91 585-598

  60. Leber, R. Bernie sanders' radical environmental proposal. 2016 New Repub.. -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. Leber, R. Hillary Clinton's big shift on fracking. 2016 Mother Jones. -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  62. Lodge, M. ; Hamill, R. A partisan schema for political information processing. 1986 Am. Polit. Sci. Rev.. 80 505-519

  63. Lupia, A. Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: information and voting behavior in california insurance reform elections. 1994 Am. Polit. Sci. Rev.. 88 63-76

  64. Lupia, A. ; McCubbins, M.D. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know?. 1998 Cambridge University Press: New York

  65. Marchand, J. Local labor market impacts of energy boom-bust-boom in Western Canada. 2012 J. Urban Econ.. 71 165-174

  66. Mazur, A. How did the fracking controversy emerge in the period 2010–2012?. 2016 Public Underst. Sci.. 25 207-222
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  67. McCright, A.M. ; Dunlap, R.E. The politicization of climate change and polarization in the american public's views of global warming, 2001–2010. 2011 Sociol. Q.. 52 155-194
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. McCright, A.M. ; Xiao, C. ; Dunlap, R.E. Political polarization on support for government spending on environmental protection in the USA, 1974–2012. 2014 Soc. Sci. Res.. 48 251-260
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  69. McKay, L.K. ; Johnson, R.H. ; Salita, L.A. Science and the reasonable development of marcellus shale natural gas resources in Pennsylvania and New York. 2011 Energy Law J.. 32 125-143
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  70. Miller, J.D. The measurement of civic scientific literacy. 1998 Public Underst. Sci.. 7 203-223
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  71. Mondak, J.J. Public opinion and heuristic processing of source cues. 1993 Polit. Behav.. 15 167-192
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. Mondak, J.J. Source cues and policy approval: the cognitive dynamics of public support for the reagan agenda. 1993 Am. J. Polit. Sci.. 37 186-212
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  73. Natural Resource Defense Council, 2015. Government leaders take note: NY’s fracking ban consistent with the evidence and public opinion. 〈https://www.nrdc.org/experts/kate-sinding/government-leaders-take-note-nys-fracking-ban-consistent-evidence-public〉.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  74. O’Sullivan, F. ; Paltsev, S. Shale gas production: potential versus actual greenhouse gas emissions. 2012 Environ. Res. Lett.. 7 1-6
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  75. Petersen, M.B. ; Skov, M. ; Serritzlew, S. ; Ramsøy, T. Motivated reasoning and political parties: evidence for increased processing in the face of party cues. 2013 Polit. Behav.. 35 831-854
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  76. Petrocik, J.R. Measuring party support: leaners are not independents. 2009 Elect. Stud.. 28 562-572
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  77. Pew Research Center, 2015a. Public and Scientists' Views on Science and Society. Retrieved from:〈http://www.pewinternet.org/files/2015/01/PI_ScienceandSociety_Report_012915.pdf〉.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  78. Pew Research Center, 2015b. How Americans View the Top Energy and Environmental Issues. Retrieved from 〈http://www.pewresearch.org/key-data-points/environment-energy-2/〉.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  79. Popkin, S.L. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Elections. 1991 University of Chicago Press: Chicago
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  80. Rabe, B.G. ; Borick, C. Conventional politics for unconventional drilling? Lessons from Pennsylvania's early move into fracking policy development. 2013 Rev. Policy Res.. 30 321-340

  81. Rahn, W.M. The role of partisan stereotypes in information processing about political candidates. 1993 Am. J. Polit. Sci.. 37 472-496
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  82. Redlawsk, D.P. Hot cognition or cool consideration? Testing the effects of motivated reasoning on political decision making. 2002 J. Polit.. 64 1021-1044
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  83. Richardson, V. Republicans blast new interior fracking safety rules as unnecessary job-killers. 2015 Wash. Times. -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  84. Rosenbaum, W.A. American Energy: The Politics of 21st Century Policy. 2014 CQ Press: Washington, DC
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  85. Samuelson, W. ; Zeckhauser, R. Status quo bias in decision making. 1988 J. Risk Uncertain.. 1 7-59

  86. Schrag, D.P. Is shale gas good for climate change?. 2012 Daedalus. 141 72-80
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  87. Smith, M.F. ; Ferguson, D.P. “Fracking democracy”: issue management and locus of policy decision-making in the Marcellus Shale gas drilling debate. 2013 Public Relat. Rev.. 39 377-386
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  88. Stedman, R.C. ; Parkins, J.R. ; Beckley, T.M. Forest dependence and community well-being in rural Canada: variation by forest sector and region. 2005 Can. J. For. Res.. 35 215-220
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  89. Stedman, R.C. ; Parkins, J.R. ; Beckley, T.M. Resource dependence and community well‐being in rural Canada. 2004 Rural Sociol.. 69 213-234
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  90. Taber, C.S. ; Lodge, M. Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. 2006 Am. J. Polit. Sci.. 50 755-769

  91. Taylor, S.E. ; Fiske, S.T. Salience, attention, and attribution: Top of the head phenomena. 1978 Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol.. 11 249-288
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  92. Theodori, G.L. ; Luloff, A. ; Willits, F.K. ; Burnett, D.B. Hydraulic fracturing and the management, disposal, and reuse of frac flowback waters: views from the public in the marcellus shale. 2014 Energy Res. Soc. Sci.. 2 66-74
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  93. U.S. Energy Information Agency (U.S.E.I.A.), 2016. Annual Energy Outlook. 〈http://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/〉 (Accessed 12 December 2016).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  94. Villar, A. ; Krosnick, J.A. Global warming vs. climate change, taxes vs. prices: does word choice matter?. 2011 Clim. Change. 105 1-12
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  95. Warner, B. ; Shapiro, J. Fractured, fragmented federalism: a study in fracking regulatory policy. 2013 Publius: J. Fed.. 43 474-496

  96. Weber, E.U. ; Stern, P.C. Public understanding of climate change in the United States. 2011 Am. Psychol.. 66 315-328
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  97. Wigley, T.M. Coal to gas: the influence of methane leakage. 2011 Clim. Change. 108 601-608

  98. Wolske, K. ; Hoffman, A. Public Perceptions of High-volume Hydraulic Fracturing & Deep Shale Gas Development. 2013 Graham Sustainability Institute:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  99. Zaller, J. The Nature and Rigins of Mass Opinion. 1992 Cambridge University Press: New York
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  100. Zaller, J. ; Feldman, S. A simple theory of the survey response: answering questions versus revealing preferences. 1992 Am. J. Polit. Sci.. 36 579-616
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Credible Sources of Information Regarding Induced Seismicity. (2020). Javernick-Will, Amy ; Tracy, Andrew.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:2308-:d:332984.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Public Preferences in a Shifting Energy Future: Comparing Public Views of Eight Energy Sources in North America’s Pacific Northwest. (2020). Boudet, Hilary Schaffer ; Hazboun, Shawn Olson.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:8:p:1940-:d:345777.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Ideology and Value Determinants of Public Support for Energy Policies in the U.S.: A Focus on Western States. (2020). Warner, Rebecca L ; Steel, Brent S ; Wolters, Erika Allen.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:8:p:1890-:d:344960.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Determining feature importance for actionable climate change mitigation policies. (2020). Balaprakash, Prasanna ; Wehde, Wesley ; Choi, Junghwa ; Maulik, Romit.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2003.10234.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. The impact of shale development on crop farmers: how the size and location of farms matter. (2019). Crowe, Jessica A.
    In: Agriculture and Human Values.
    RePEc:spr:agrhuv:v:36:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10460-018-9882-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Governance of shale gas development: Insights from the Bloomington school of institutional analysis. (2019). Piano, Ennio Emanuele ; Murtazashvili, Ilia.
    In: The Review of Austrian Economics.
    RePEc:kap:revaec:v:32:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s11138-018-0424-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Uncertainty, learning, and local opposition to hydraulic fracturing. (2019). Manning, Dale ; Hess, Joshua ; Cutler, Harvey ; Iverson, Terry.
    In: Resource and Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:resene:v:55:y:2019:i:c:p:102-123.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Public perceptions of established and emerging mining technologies in Australia. (2019). McCrea, Rod ; Malakar, Yuwan ; Lacey, Justine ; Moffat, Kieren.
    In: Resources Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:62:y:2019:i:c:p:125-135.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Determinants of earthquake damage liability assignment in Oklahoma: A Bayesian Tobit censored approach. (2019). Boyer, Tracy A ; Ng, John N.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:131:y:2019:i:c:p:422-433.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Putting on partisan glasses: Political identity, quality of life, and oil and gas production in Colorado. (2019). McKenzie, Lisa ; Crooks, James L ; Mayer, Adam ; Malin, Stephanie A ; Adgate, John L ; Peel, Jennifer L.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:129:y:2019:i:c:p:738-748.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. The structure of attitudes towards shale gas extraction in the United Kingdom. (2019). Knight, Wil ; Humphrey, Mathew ; Rose, Jonathan ; Andersson-Hudson, Jessica ; O'Hara, Sarah .
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:129:y:2019:i:c:p:693-697.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Same or different? Insights on public perception and acceptance of carbon capture and storage or utilization in Germany. (2019). Ziefle, M ; Bardow, A ; Sternberg, A ; Kaetelhoen, A ; Linzenich, A ; Heek, Offermann-Van J ; Arning, K.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:125:y:2019:i:c:p:235-249.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Public Attitudes towards Hydraulic Fracturing in Western Newfoundland. (2019). Martinez-Espieira, Roberto ; Matesanz, David ; Garcia-Valias, Maria A.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:84:y:2019:i:c:s0140988319302737.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Information on environmental protection and annual reports of oil companies. (2019). Lulek, Adam.
    In: Ekonomia i Prawo.
    RePEc:cpn:umkeip:v:18:y:2019:i:4:p:475-486.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. The economic, social and environmental impact of shale gas exploitation in Romania: A cost-benefit analysis. (2018). Albulescu, Claudiu ; Aceleanu, Mirela Ionela ; Grecu, Eugenia.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:93:y:2018:i:c:p:691-700.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Planning in a changing environment: Applications of portfolio optimisation to deal with risk in the electricity sector. (2018). Odeh, Rodrigo Perez ; Flores, Yarela ; Watts, David.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:82:y:2018:i:p3:p:3808-3823.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. The influence of extractive activities on public support for renewable energy policy. (2018). Olson-Hazboun, Shawn K ; Leiserowitz, Anthony ; Howe, Peter D.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:123:y:2018:i:c:p:117-126.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Out of sight, out of mind? Investigating the longitudinal impact of the Fukushima nuclear accident on public opinion in the United States. (2018). Soni, Anmol .
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:122:y:2018:i:c:p:169-175.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Analyzing the factors that influence U.S. public support for exporting natural gas. (2018). Pierce, Jonathan J ; Hillyard, Megan ; Zanocco, Chad ; Boudet, Hilary.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:120:y:2018:i:c:p:666-674.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. What explains local policy elites’ preferences toward renewable energy/energy efficiency policy?. (2018). Tumlison, Creed ; Kester, John ; Song, Geoboo ; Button, Eric D.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:117:y:2018:i:c:p:377-386.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Public perceptions of energy policies: Predicting support, opposition, and nonsubstantive responses. (2018). Edwards, Michelle L.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:117:y:2018:i:c:p:348-357.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Engaging attribute tradeoffs in clean energy portfolio development. (2018). Bessette, Douglas L ; Arvai, Joseph L.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:115:y:2018:i:c:p:221-229.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. How do landowners learn about high-volume hydraulic fracturing? A survey of Eastern Ohio landowners in active or proposed drilling units. (2018). Arnold, Gwen ; Holahan, Robert ; Farrer, Benjamin.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:114:y:2018:i:c:p:455-464.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. UK public beliefs about fracking and effects of knowledge on beliefs and support: A problem for shale gas policy. (2018). Howell, Rachel A.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:113:y:2018:i:c:p:721-730.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Local residents risk perceptions in response to shale gas exploitation: Evidence from China. (2018). Yu, Chin-Hsien ; Chen, Xiaolan ; Qin, Ping ; Huang, Shih-Kai.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:113:y:2018:i:c:p:123-134.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Disclosing water-energy-economics nexus in shale gas development. (2018). Calderon, Andres J ; Reklaitis, Gintaras V ; Papageorgiou, Lazaros G ; Guerra, Omar J.
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:225:y:2018:i:c:p:710-731.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Unpacking the intensity of policy conflict: a study of Colorado’s oil and gas subsystem. (2017). Weible, Christopher M ; Heikkila, Tanya.
    In: Policy Sciences.
    RePEc:kap:policy:v:50:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s11077-017-9285-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Marcellus Shale Fracking and Susquehanna River Stakeholder Attitudes: A Five-Year Update. (2017). Yan, Shan ; Heuer, Mark.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:10:p:1713-:d:113081.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Chemicals usage in stimulation processes for shale gas and deep geothermal systems: A comprehensive review and comparison. (2017). Sutra, Emilie ; Burgherr, Peter ; Spada, Matteo .
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:77:y:2017:i:c:p:1-11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Political identity and paradox in oil and gas policy: A study of regulatory exaggeration in Colorado, US. (2017). Mayer, Adam.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:109:y:2017:i:c:p:452-459.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Public acceptance of renewable energy technologies from an abstract versus concrete perspective and the positive imagery of solar power. (2017). Sutterlin, Bernadette ; Siegrist, Michael.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:106:y:2017:i:c:p:356-366.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. How do U.S. state residents form opinions about ‘fracking’ in social contexts? A multilevel analysis. (2017). Howell, Emily L ; Brossard, Dominique ; Xenos, Michael A ; Scheufele, Dietram A ; Akin, Heather ; Li, Nan.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:106:y:2017:i:c:p:345-355.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Costs, benefits, and the malleability of public support for “Fracking”. (2017). Christenson, Dino P ; Kriner, Douglas L ; Goldfarb, Jillian L.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:105:y:2017:i:c:p:407-417.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Understanding the psychological impact of unconventional gas developments in affected communities. (2017). Grimstad, Sidsel ; Gudergan, Siegfried P ; Lyons, Kevin D ; Lai, Po-Hsin.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:101:y:2017:i:c:p:492-501.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Energy Technology, Politics, and Interpretative Frames: Shale Gas Fracking in Eastern Europe. (2016). Goldthau, Andreas ; Sovacool, Benjamin K.
    In: Global Environmental Politics.
    RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:16:y:2016:i:4:p:50-69.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Comparative Analysis of Hydraulic Fracturing Wastewater Practices in Unconventional Shale Development: Newspaper Coverage of Stakeholder Concerns and Social License to Operate. (2016). Alessi, Daniel S ; Thompson, Dara Y ; Gehman, Joel ; Goss, Greg G ; Allen, Diana M.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:9:p:912-:d:77704.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Place-based perceptions of the impacts of fracking along the Marcellus Shale. (2016). Sangaramoorthy, Thurka ; Wilson, Sacoby M ; Milton, Donald K ; Sapkota, Amir ; Payne-Sturges, Devon C ; Boyle, Meleah D ; Jamison, Amelia M.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:151:y:2016:i:c:p:27-37.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Geographic proximity to coal plants and U.S. public support for extending the Production Tax Credit. (2016). Kriner, Douglas L ; Goldfarb, Jillian L ; Buessing, Marric .
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:99:y:2016:i:c:p:299-307.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Public perceptions and acceptance of induced earthquakes related to energy development. (2016). McComas, Katherine A ; Song, Hwansuck ; Furtney, Maria A ; Keranen, Katie M ; Lu, Hang .
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:99:y:2016:i:c:p:27-32.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Exploring support for shale gas extraction in the United Kingdom. (2016). OHARA, SARAH ; Andersson-Hudson, Jessica ; Humphrey, Mathew ; Knight, William .
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:98:y:2016:i:c:p:582-589.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. The geopolitical impact of the shale revolution: Exploring consequences on energy prices and rentier states. (2016). Auping, Willem L ; Kwakkel, Jan H ; de Jong, Sijbren ; Pruyt, Erik .
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:98:y:2016:i:c:p:390-399.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. How geographic distance and political ideology interact to influence public perception of unconventional oil/natural gas development. (2016). , Darrick ; Boudet, Hilary S ; Bugden, Dylan ; Clarke, Christopher E ; Hart, Sol P ; Stedman, Richard C ; Jacquet, Jeffrey B.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:97:y:2016:i:c:p:301-309.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. It’s the Society, Stupid! Communicating Emergent Climate Technologies in the Internet Age. (2016). Reiner, David ; Corry, Olaf .
    In: Cambridge Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:cam:camdae:1610.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Chinas unconventional oil: A review of its resources and outlook for long-term production. (2015). Mikael, Hook ; Tang, XU ; Gail, Tverberg E. ; Steve, Mohr ; Feng, Lianyong ; Wang, Jianliang.
    In: Energy.
    RePEc:eee:energy:v:82:y:2015:i:c:p:31-42.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Hydraulic fracturing – Integrating public participation with an independent review of the risks and benefits. (2015). Wheeler, David ; Ritcey, Ray ; Mauro, Ian ; MacIntosh, Constance ; Hayes, Brad ; Gagnon, Graham ; Dusseault, Maurice ; Dalton, Shawn ; Christmas, Kevin ; Atherton, Frank ; MacGregor, Margo .
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:85:y:2015:i:c:p:299-308.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Public opinion on energy development: The interplay of issue framing, top-of-mind associations, and political ideology. (2015). Clarke, Christopher E. ; Stedman, Richard C. ; Hart, Philip S. ; Schuldt, Jonathon P. ; Jacquet, Jeffrey B. ; Boudet, Hilary S. ; Evensen, Darrick T. N., .
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:81:y:2015:i:c:p:131-140.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. UK public perceptions of shale gas hydraulic fracturing: The role of audience, message and contextual factors on risk perceptions and policy support. (2015). Whitmarsh, Lorraine ; Kendall, J-Michael ; Verdon, James P ; Lloyd, Alyson ; Upham, Paul ; Nash, Nick .
    In: Applied Energy.
    RePEc:eee:appene:v:160:y:2015:i:c:p:419-430.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Contextual and psychological factors shaping evaluations and acceptability of energy alternatives: Integrated review and research agenda. (2014). Perlaviciute, Goda ; Steg, Linda.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:35:y:2014:i:c:p:361-381.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Citizen acceptance of new fossil fuel infrastructure: Value theory and Canada׳s Northern Gateway Pipeline. (2014). Axsen, Jonn.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:75:y:2014:i:c:p:255-265.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Shale gas policy in the United Kingdom: An argumentative discourse analysis. (2014). Rattle, Imogen ; Cotton, Matthew ; Van Alstine, James .
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:73:y:2014:i:c:p:427-438.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2024-12-24 06:13:16 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.