Abreu, D. (1986), âExtremal equilibria of oligopolistic supergamesâ, Journal of Economic Theory 39:191-225.
Abreu, D., D. Pearce and E. Stacchetti (1986), âOptimal cartel equilibria with imperfect monitoringâ, Journal of Economic Theory 39:251-269.
Aghion, P. and P. Bolton (1987), âContracts as a barrier to entryâ, American Economic Review 77:388-401.
- American Bar Association, Section of Antitrust Law (2005), Market Power Handbook (American Bar Association, Chicago).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- American Tobacco Co. v. United States, 328 U.S. 781, 810 (1946).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Andrade, G., M. Mitchell and E. Stafford (2001), âNew evidence and perspectives on mergersâ, Journal of Economic Perspectives 15(2):103-120.
- Antitrust, Page 132 Areeda, P. and D. Turner (1975), âPredatory pricing and related practices under Section 2 of the Sherman Actâ, Harvard Law Review 88:697-733.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Antitrust, Page 133 Baker, J. and T. Bresnahan (1988), âEstimating the residual demand curve facing a single firmâ, International Journal of Industrial Organization 6:283-300.
- Antitrust, Page 134 Bolton, P. and D. Scharfstein (1990), âA theory of predation based on agency problems in financing contractingâ, American Economic Review 80:93-106.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Antitrust, Page 135 Chamberlin, E. (1933), The Theory of Monopolistic Competition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Antitrust, Page 137 Ellison, G. (1994), âTheories of cartel stability and the joint executive committeeâ, RAND Journal of Economics 25:37-57.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Antitrust, Page 138 Farrell, J. and C. Shapiro (1990b), âHorizontal mergers: An equilibrium analysisâ, American Economic Review 80:107-126.
Antitrust, Page 139 Fumagalli, C. and M. Motta (2006), âExclusive dealing and entry: When buyers competeâ, American Economic Review 96:785-795.
Antitrust, Page 140 Harrington, J. and A. Skrzypacz (2007), âCollusion under monitoring of salesâ, RAND Journal of Economics, forthcoming.
- Antitrust, Page 141 Ivaldi, M., B. Jullien, P. Rey, P. Seabright, and J. Tirole (2003a), âThe economics of tacit collusionâ, IDEI Working Paper No. 186, Final Report for DG Competition, European Commission (IDEI, Toulouse).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Antitrust, Page 142 Kolasky, W. and A. Dick (2003), âThe Merger guidelines and the integration of efficiencies into antitrust review of horizontal mergersâ, Antitrust Law Journal 71:207-251.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Antitrust, Page 143 Lichtenberg, F. and D. Siegel (1987), âProductivity and changes in ownership of manufacturing plantsâ, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1987:643-683.
- Antitrust, Page 145 Pautler, P. (2003), âEvidence on mergers and acquisitionsâ, Antitrust Bulletin 48:119-221.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Antitrust, Page 146 Reynolds, R. and B. Snapp (1986), âThe competitive effects of partial equity interests and joint venturesâ, International Journal of Industrial Organization 4:141-153.
Antitrust, Page 147 Schmalensee, R. (1989), âInter-industry studies of structure and performanceâ, in: R.
- Antitrust, Page 148 Spier, K. and M. Whinston (1995), âOn the efficiency of privately stipulated damages for breach of contract: Entry barriers, reliance, and renegotiationâ, Rand Journal of Economics 26:180-202.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Antitrust, Page 149 Werden, G. (2004), âEconomic evidence on the existence of collusion: Reconciling antitrust law with oligopoly theoryâ, Antitrust Law Journal 71:719-800.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Antitrust, Page 150 Cases American Column & Lumber Co. v. United States, 257 U.S. 377 (1921).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Antitrust, Page 151 Theatre Enterprises v. Paramount Film Distributing Corp., 346 U.S. 537 (1954).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Areeda, P. and H. Hovenkamp (2002), Antitrust Law: An Analysis of Antitrust Principles and Their Application, vols. 3, 3A, 6, 2nd ed. (Aspen Law & Business, New York).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Areeda, P., H. Hovenkamp and J. Solow (1998), Antitrust Law: An Analysis of Antitrust Principles and Their Application, vols. 4 and vol. 4A, revised ed. (Aspen Law & Business, New York).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Areeda, P., L. Kaplow and A. Edlin (2004), Antitrust Analysis, 6th ed. (Aspen Publishers, New York).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Armstrong, M. and R. Porter, eds. (2007), Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. 3 (Elsevier Science Publishers, New York).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Arrow, K. (1962), âThe economic implications of learning by doingâ, Review of Economic Studies 29:155-173.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Athey, S. and K. Bagwell (2001), âOptimal collusion with private informationâ, RAND Journal of Economics 32:428-465.
Athey, S. and K. Bagwell (2004), âCollusion with persistent cost shocks,â working paper, Harvard University.
Athey, S., K. Bagwell and C. Sanchirico (2004), âCollusion and price rigidityâ, Review of Economic Studies 71:317-349.
- Bagwell, K. and R. Staiger (1997), âCollusion over the business cycleâ, RAND Journal of Economics 28:82-106.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bajari, P. and G. Summers (2002), âDetecting collusion in procurement auctionsâ, Antitrust Law Journal 70:143-170.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Baker, J. (1994), âPredatory pricing after Brooke Group: An economic perspectiveâ, Antitrust Law Journal 62:585-603.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Baker, J. (1999), âEconometric analysis in FTC v. Staplesâ, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 18:11-21.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Baker, J. (2002), âMavericks, mergers and exclusion: Proving coordinated competitive effects under the antitrust lawsâ, New York University Law Review 77:135-203.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Baker, J. (2003a), âThe case for antitrust enforcementâ, Journal of Economic Perspectives 17(2):27-50.
- Baker, J. (2003b), âResponding to developments in economics and the courts: Entry in the merger guidelinesâ, Antitrust Law Journal 71:189-206.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Baker, J. and D. Rubinfeld (1999), âEmpirical methods in antitrust litigation: Review and critiqueâ, American Law and Economics Review 1:386-435.
- Baker, J. and T. Bresnahan (1985), âThe gains from merger or collusion in product-differentiated industriesâ, Journal of Industrial Economics 33:427-444.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Barton, D. and R. Sherman, (1984), âThe price and profit effects of horizontal merger: A case studyâ, Journal of Industrial Economics 33:165-177.
- Baumol, W. (1979), âQuasi-permanence of price reductions: A policy for prevention of predatory pricingâ, Yale Law Journal 89:1-26.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bellamy, C. and G. Child, (2001), European Community Law of Competition, 5th ed. (Sweet & Maxwell, London).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Benoit, J.-P. (1984), âFinancially constrained entry in a game with incomplete informationâ, RAND Journal of Economics 15:490-499.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Benoit, J.-P. and V. Krishna (1987), âDynamic duopoly: Prices and quantitiesâ, Review of Economic Studies 54:23-35.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Bernheim, B.D. and D. Ray (1989) âCollective dynamic consistency in repeated gamesâ, Games and Economic Behavior 1:295-326.
Bernheim, B.D. and M. Whinston (1990), âMultimarket contact and collusive behaviorâ, RAND Journal of Economics 21:1-26.
- Bernheim, B.D. and M. Whinston (1998),âExclusive dealingâ, Journal of Political Economy 106:64-103.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Berry, S. (1994), âEstimating discrete-choice models of product differentiationâ, RAND Journal of Economics 25:242-262.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Berry, S. and P. Reiss (2007), âEmpirical models of entry and market structure,â in: M.
- Besanko, D. and M. Perry (1993), âExclusive dealing in a spatial model of retail differentiationâ, International Journal of Industrial Organization 12:297-329.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Besanko, D. and M. Perry (1994), âEquilibrium incentives for exclusive dealing in a differentiated products oligopolyâ, RAND Journal of Economics 24:646-667.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. United States, 246 U.S. 231 (1918).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bolton, P., J. Brodley and M. Riordan (2000), âPredatory pricing: Strategic theory and legal policyâ, Georgetown Law Journal 88:2239-2330.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Borenstein, S. (1990), âAirline mergers, airport dominance, and market powerâ, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 80(2):400-404.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Borenstein, S. and A. Shepard (1996), âDynamic pricing in retail gasoline marketsâ, RAND Journal of Economics 27:429-451.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bork, R. (1978), The Antitrust Paradox: A Policy at War with Itself (Basic Books, New York).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Bresnahan, T. (1989), âEmpirical studies of industries with market power,â in: R. Schmalensee and R. Willig, eds., Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. 2 (North-Holland, Amsterdam) 1011-1057.
Bresnahan, T. and S. Salop (1986), âQuantifying the competitive effects of production joint venturesâ, International Journal of Industrial Organization 4:155-175.
- Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 441 U.S. 1 (1979).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Brock, W. and J. Scheinkman (1985), âPrice setting supergames with capacity constraintsâ, Review of Economic Studies 52:371-382.
- Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209 (1993).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294 (1962).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Buccirossi, ed., Advances in the Economics of Competition Law (MIT Press, Cambridge), forthcoming. Werden, G., L. Froeb and D. Scheffman (2004), âA Daubert discipline for merger simulationâ, Antitrust 18(3):89-95.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bulow, J. and P. Pfleiderer (1983), âA note on the effect of cost changes on pricesâ, Journal of Political Economy 91:182-185.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Burns, M. (1986), âPredatory pricing and the acquisition cost of competitorsâ, Journal of Political Economy 94:266-296.
- Capps, C., D. Dranove, S. Greenstein and M. Satterthwaite (2002), âAntitrust policy and hospital mergers: Recommendations for a new approachâ, Antitrust Bulletin 27:677-714.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Carlton, D. (2004), âWhy barriers to entry are barriers to understandingâ, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 94(2):466-470.
- Carlton, D. and J.M. Perloff (2005), Modern Industrial Organization, 4th ed. (Pearson-Addison Wesley, Boston).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Chung, T.-Y. (1992), âOn the social optimality of liquidated damage clauses: An economic analysisâ, Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 8:280-305.
- Coase, R. (1937), âThe nature of the firmâ, Economica 4:386-405.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Coate, M. and S. Ulrick (2005), âTransparency at the Federal Trade Commission: The horizontal merger review process 1996-2003â, Bureau of Economics, Federal Trade Commission, available at www.ftc.gov/os/2005/02/0502economicissues.pdf.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Compte, O. (1998), âCommunication in repeated games with private monitoringâ, Econometrica 66:597-626.
Compte, O., F. Jenny and P. Rey (2002), âCapacity constraints, mergers and collusionâ, European Economic Review 46(1):1-29.
Connor, J.M. (2007), âPrice-fixing overcharges: Legal and economic evidenceâ, in: J.B.
- Cooper, T. (1986), âMost-favored-customer pricing and tacit collusionâ, RAND Journal of Economics 17:377-388.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Cournot, A.A. (1838), Researches into the Mathematical Principles of the Theory of Wealth, English ed. (Kelley, New York). Cramton, P. and J. Schwartz (2000), âCollusive bidding: Lessons from the FCC spectrum auctionsâ, Journal of Regulatory Economics 17(4):229-252.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Crandall, R. and C. Whinston (2003), âDoes antitrust policy improve consumer welfare: Assessing the evidenceâ, Journal of Economic Perspectives 17:3-26.
Crawford, V. (1998), âA survey of experiments on communication via cheap talkâ, Journal of Economic Theory 78:286-298.
- Dabbah, M. (2004), EC and UK Competition Law (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Davidson, C. and R. Deneckere (1984), âHorizontal mergers and collusive behaviorâ, International Journal of Industrial Organization 2:117-132.
- Davidson, C. and R. Deneckere (1990), âExcess capacity and collusionâ, International Economic Review 31:521-541.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Deneckere, R. and C. Davidson (1985), âIncentives to form coalitions with Bertrand competitionâ, RAND Journal of Economics 16:473-486.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Diamond, P. and E. Maskin (1979), âAn equilibrium analysis of search and breach of contract, I: Steady statesâ, Bell Journal of Economics 10:282-316.
- Director, A. and E. Levi (1956), âLaw and the future: Trade regulationâ, Northwestern University Law Review 51: 281-296.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Dixit, A. (1979), âA model of duopoly suggesting a theory of entry barriersâ, Bell Journal of Economics 10: 20-32.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Dixit, A. (1980), âThe role of investment in entry-deterrenceâ, Economic Journal 90:95-106.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, 729 F.2d 128 (2nd Cir. 1984).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- ECS/Akzo II, Decision of the Commission, 1985 OJ L 374/1 (December 14, 1985).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Edlin, A. (1997), âDo guaranteed-low-price policies guarantee high prices, and can antitrust rise to the challenge?â, Harvard Law Review 111:528-575.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Edlin, A. (2002), âStopping above-cost predatory pricingâ, Yale Law Journal 111:941-991.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Edlin, A. and E. Emch (1999), âThe welfare losses from price matching policiesâ, Journal of Industrial Economics 47:145-167.
- Elhauge, E. (2003a), âDefining better monopolization standardsâ, Stanford Law Review 56:253344.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Elhauge, E. (2003b), âWhy above-cost price cuts to drive out entrants are not predatory and the implications for defining market powerâ, Yale Law Journal 112:681-828.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Elzinga, K. and T. Hogarty (1973), âThe problem of geographical market delineation in antimerger suitsâ, Antitrust Bulletin 18:45-81.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Epstein, R. and D. Rubinfeld (2001), âMerger simulation: A simplified approach with new applicationsâ, Antitrust Law Journal 69:883-919.
Epstein, R. and D. Rubinfeld (2004), âMerger simulation with brand-level margin data: Extending PCAIDS with nestsâ, Advances in Economic Analysis and Policy 4:1-26.
- European Union (2001), âGuidelines on the applicability of Article 81 of the EC Treaty to horizontal cooperative agreementsâ, European Commission, Official Journal of the European Communities, 6.1.2001, C 3/2.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- European Union (2004a), âGuidelines on the assessment of horizontal mergersâ, European Commission, Regulation 139/2004, 1 May.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- European Union (2004b), âGuidelines on the assessment of horizontal mergers under the Council regulation on the control of concentrations between undertakingsâ, Official Journal of the European Union, February, 2004/C 31/03.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Evans, W.N. and I.N. Kessides (1994), âLiving by the âGolden Ruleâ: Multimarket contact in the U.S. airline industryâ, Quarterly Journal of Economics 109:341-366.
- Farrell, J. (2000), âRenegotiation in repeated oligopoly interactionâ, in: G. Myles and P.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Farrell, J. and C. Shapiro (1990a), âAsset ownership and market structure in oligopolyâ, RAND Journal of Economics 21:275-292.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Farrell, J. and C. Shapiro (2001), âScale economies and synergies in horizontal merger analysisâ, Antitrust Law Journal 68:685-710.
Farrell, J. and E. Maskin (1989) âRenegotiation in repeated gamesâ, Games and Economic Behavior 1:327-360.
- Farrell, J. and M. Rabin (1996), âCheap talkâ, Journal of Economic Perspectives 10(3):103-118.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Farrell, J. and M.L. Katz (2006), âThe economics of welfare standards in antitrustâ, Competition Policy International 2(2):3-28.
- Federal Trade Commission (2002), âUnderstanding mergers: Strategy and planning, implementation and outcomesâ, Bureau of Economics, Merger Roundtable Papers, available at http://www.ftc.gov/be/rt/mergerroundtable.htm.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Federal Trade Commission and U.S. Department of Justice (2003), âMerger challenges data: Fiscal years 1999-2003â, available at http://www.ftc.gov/os/2003/12/mdp.pdf.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Federal Trade Commission and U.S. Department of Justice (2004), âJoint workshop on merger enforcementâ, February 17â19, http://www.ftc.gov/bc/mergerenforce/index.html.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Federal Trade Commission and U.S. Department of Justice (2006), âCommentary on the horizontal merger guidelinesâ, available at www.ftc.gov/os/2006/03/CommentaryontheHorizontalMergerGuidelinesMarch2006.pdf.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Federal Trade Commission v. Indiana Federation of Dentists, 476 U.S. 447 (1986).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Federal Trade Commission v. Swedish Match, 131 F. Supp 2d 151 (D.D.C. 2000).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Fisher, F. and J. McGowan (1983), âOn the misuse of accounting rates of return to infer monopoly profitsâ, American Economic Review 73:82-97.
- Frech, H.E., J. Langenfeld and R.F. McCluer (2004), âElzinga-Hogarty tests and alternative approaches for market share calculations in hospital mergersâ, Antitrust Law Journal 71:921-947.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Friedman, J. (1971), âA non-cooperative equilibrium for supergamesâ, Review of Economic Studies 38:1-12.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Froeb, L. and G. Werden (1998), âA robust test for consumer welfare enhancing mergers among sellers of a homogeneous productâ, Economics Letters 58:367-369.
Fudenberg, D. and E. Maskin (1986), âThe folk theorem in repeated games with discounting or with incomplete informationâ, Econometrica 54:533:554.
- Fudenberg, D. and J. Tirole (1986), âA âsignal-jammingâ theory of predationâ, RAND Journal of Economics 17:366-376.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Fudenberg, D., D. Levine and E. Maskin (1994), âThe folk theorem with imperfect public informationâ, Econometrica 62:997-1039.
Gilbert, R. (1989), âMobility barriers and the value of incumbencyâ, in: R. Schmalensee and R.
Green, E. and R. Porter (1984), âNoncooperative collusion under imperfect price informationâ, Econometrica 52:87-100.
Grossman, S. and O. Hart (1986), âThe costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integrationâ, Journal of Political Economy 94: 691-719.
- Guzman, A. (1998), âIs international antitrust possible?â, New York University Law Review 73:1501-1548.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Haltiwanger, J. and J. Harrington (1991), âThe impact of cyclical demand movements on collusive behaviorâ, RAND Journal of Economics 22:89-106.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Harrington, J. (1989), âCollusion among asymmetric firms: The case of different discount factorsâ, International Journal of Industrial Organization 7:289-307.
- Harrington, J. (2004a), âCartel pricing dynamics in the presence of an antitrust authorityâ, RAND Journal of Economics 35:651-673.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Harrington, J. (2004b) âPost-cartel pricing during litigationâ, Journal of Industrial Economics 52:517-533.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Harrington, J. (2005), âOptimal cartel pricing in the presence of an antitrust authorityâ, International Economic Review 46:145-169.
- Harrington, J. (2006a), âCorporate leniency programs and the role of the antitrust authority in detecting collusionâ, working paper, John Hopkins University.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Harrington, J. (2006b), âHow do cartels operate?â, available at http://www.econ.jhu.edu/People/Harrington/fnt06.pdf.
- Harrington, J. (2007), âDetecting cartelsâ, in: P. Buccirossi, ed., Advances in the Economics of Competition Law (MIT Press, Cambridge), forthcoming.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hart, O. and J. Moore (1990), âProperty rights and the nature of the firmâ, Journal of Political Economy 98:1119-1158.
- Hart, O. and J. Tirole (1990), âVertical integration and market foreclosureâ, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics 1990:205-286.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hastings, J. (2004), âVertical relations and competition in the retail gasoline market: Empirical evidence from contract changes in Southern Californiaâ, American Economic Review 94:317-328.
- Hausman, J., G. Leonard and C. Vellturo (1996), âMarket definition under price discriminationâ, Antitrust Law Journal 64:367-386.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hausman, J., G. Leonard and J.D. Zona (1994), âCompetitive analysis with differentiated productsâ, Annales dâEconomie et de Statistique 34:159-180.
Hawk, B. (1988), âThe American (anti-trust) revolution: Lessons for the EEC?â, European Competition Law Review 9:53-87.
- Hayes, J., C. Shapiro and R. Town (2007), âMarket definition in crude oil: Estimating the effects of the BP/ARCO mergerâ, Antitrust Bulletin, forthcoming.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Healy, P., K. Palepu and R. Ruback (1992), âDoes corporate performance improve after mergers?â, Journal of Financial Economics 31:135-175.
Heyer, K. (2006), âWelfare standards and merger analysis: Why not the best?â, Competition Policy International 2(2):29-54.
Holmstrom, B. and J. Tirole (1989), âThe theory of the firm,â in: R. Schmalensee and R. Willig, eds., Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. 1 (North-Holland, Amsterdam) 61-133.
- Hovenkamp, H. (1998), Antitrust Law: An Analysis of Antitrust Principles and Their Application, vol. 11 (Aspen Law & Business, New York).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hylton, K. (2003), Antitrust Law: Economic Theory and Common Law Evolution (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Innes, R. and R.J. Sexton (1994), âStrategic buyers and exclusionary contractsâ, American Economic Review 84:566-584.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Isaac, R.M. and V. Smith (1985), âIn search of predatory pricingâ, Journal of Political Economy 93:320-345.
- Ivaldi, M., B. Jullien, P. Rey, P. Seabright, and J. Tirole (2003b), âThe economics of unilateral effectsâ, IDEI Working Paper No. 222, Interim Report for DG Competition, European Commission (IDEI, Toulouse).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Jung, Y.J., J. Kagel and D. Levin (1994), âOn the existence of predatory pricing: An experimental study of reputation and entry deterrence in the chain-store gameâ, RAND Journal of Economics 25:72-93.
- KÃhn, K.-U. (2001), âFighting collusion by regulating communication between firmsâ, Economic Policy: A European Forum 16(32):167-197.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Kandori, M. and H. Matsushima (1998), âPrivate observation, communication and collusionâ, Econometrica 66:627-652.
Kaplan, S. (2000), ed., Mergers and Productivity (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
- Kaplow, L. (1982), âThe accuracy of traditional market power analysis and a direct adjustment alternativeâ, Harvard Law Review 95:1817-1848.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Kaplow, L. (1985), âExtension of monopoly power through leverageâ, Columbia Law Review 85:515-556.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Kaplow, L. (2004), âOn the (ir)relevance of distribution and labor supply distortion to public goods provision and regulationâ, Journal of Economic Perspectives 18(4):159-175.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Kaplow, L. and S. Shavell (1994), âWhy the legal system is less efficient than the income tax in redistributing incomeâ, Journal of Legal Studies 23:667-681.
Katz, M. (1989), âVertical contractual relationsâ, in: R. Schmalensee and R.Willig eds., Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. 1 (North-Holland, Amsterdam) 655-721.
- Katz, M. and C. Shapiro (2003), âCritical loss: Letâs tell the whole storyâ, Antitrust 17(2):49-56.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Kim, E.H. and V. Singal (1993) âMergers and market power: Evidence from the airline industryâ, American Economic Review 83:549-569.
Kirkwood, ed., Research in Law and Economics, vol. 22 (JAI/Elsevier, Amsterdam), forthcoming. Cooper, R., D. DeJong, R. Forsythe and T. Ross (1989), âCommunication in the battle of the sexes game: Some experimental resultsâ, RAND Journal of Economics 20:568-587.
Klemperer, P. (2002), âHow (not) to run auctions: The European 3G Telecom auctionsâ, European Economic Review 46:829-845.
Klemperer, P. (2004), Auctions: Theory and Practice (Princeton University Press, Princeton).
- Koller, R. (1971), âThe myth of predatory pricing: An empirical studyâ, Antitrust Law and Economics Review 4(4):105-123.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Kovacic, W., R. Marshall, L. Marx and S. Schulenberg (2006), âQuantitative analysis of coordinated effectsâ, working paper.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Krattenmaker, T. and S. Salop (1986), âAnticompetitive exclusion: Raising rivalsâ costs to achieve power over priceâ, Yale Law Journal 96:209-293.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Kreps, D. and J. Scheinkman (1983), âQuantity precommitment and Bertrand competition yield Cournot outcomesâ, Bell Journal of Economics 14:326-337.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Kreps, D. and R. Wilson (1982), âReputation and imperfect informationâ, Journal of Economic Theory 27:253-279.
Lambson, V.E. (1987), âOptimal penal codes in price-setting supergames with capacity constraintsâ, Review of Economic Studies 54:385-397.
Lambson, V.E. (1994), âSome results on optimal penal codes in asymmetric Bertrand supergamesâ, Journal of Economic Theory 62:444-468.
Lambson, V.E. (1995), âOptimal penal codes in nearly symmetric Bertrand supergames with capacity constraintsâ, Journal of Mathematical Economics 24:1-22.
- Landes, W. and R. Posner (1981), âMarket power in antitrust casesâ, Harvard Law Review 94:937-996.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Leary, T. (2002), âThe essential stability of merger policy in the United Statesâ, Antitrust Law Journal 70:105-142.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Levenstein, M. and V. Suslow (2006), âWhat determines cartel success?â, Journal of Economic Literature 44:43-95.
Levin, D. (1990), âHorizontal mergers: The 50 percent benchmarkâ, American Economic Review 80:1238-1245.
- Lorain Journal Co. v. United States, 342 U.S. 143 (1951).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Mankiw, N.G. and M.D. Whinston (1986), âFree entry and social inefficiencyâ, RAND Journal of Economics 17:48-58.
- Marshall, R. and M. Meurer (2004), âBidder collusion and antitrust law: Refining the analysis of price fixing to account for the special features of auction marketsâ, Antitrust Law Journal 72:83-118.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Marvel, H. (1982), âExclusive dealingâ, Journal of Law and Economics 25:1-25.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Mason, C., O. Phillips and C. Nowell (1992), âDuopoly behavior in asymmetric markets: An experimental evaluationâ, Review of Economics and Statistics 74:662-670.
Masten, S. and E. Snyder (1993), âUnited States versus United Shoe Machinery Corporation: On the meritsâ, Journal of Law and Economics 36:33-70.
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574 (1986).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
McAfee, P. and M. Schwartz, (1994), âOpportunism in multilateral vertical contracting: Nondiscrimination, exclusivity, and uniformityâ, American Economic Review 84:210230.
McAfee, P. and M. Williams (1992), âHorizontal mergers and antitrust policyâ, Journal of Industrial Economics 40:181-187.
- McAfee, R.P., H.M. Mialon and M.A. Williams, (2004), âWhen are sunk costs barriers to entry? Entry barriers in economic and antitrust analysisâ, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 94(2):461-465.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
McCutcheon, B. (1997), âDo meetings in smoke-filled rooms facilitate collusion?â, Journal of Political Economy 105:330-350.
- McGee, J. (1958), âPredatory price cutting: The Standard Oil (N.J.) Caseâ, Journal of Law and Economics 1:137-169.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
McGuckin, R. and S. Nguyen (1995), âOn productivity and plant ownership change: New evidence from the Longitudinal Research Databaseâ, RAND Journal of Economics 26:257-276.
- Melamed, A.D. (2006), âExclusive dealing agreements and other exclusionary conduct: Are there unifying principles?â, Antitrust Law Journal 73:375-412.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Michelin v. European Commission, ECR 3461 30, Case 322/81 (1983).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp., 465 U.S. 752 (1984).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Motta, M. (2004), Competition Policy: Theory and Practice (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
Motta, M. and M. Polo (2003), âLeniency programs and cartel prosecutionâ, International Journal of Industrial Organization 21:347-379.
- Muris, T. (1999), âThe government and merger efficiencies: Still hostile after all these yearsâ, George Mason Law Review 7:729-752.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Nalebuff, B. (2003), âBundling, tying, and portfolio effects, Part 1: Conceptual issuesâ, Department of Trade and Industry Economics Paper No. 1, available at http://www.dti.gov.uk/files/file14774.pdf.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, 468 U.S. 85 (1984).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- National Society of Professional Engineers v. United States, 435 U.S. 679 (1978).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Nevo, A. (2000a), âMergers with differentiated products: The case of the ready-to-eat cereal industryâ, RAND Journal of Economics 31:395-421.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Nevo, A. (2000b), âA practitionerâs guide to estimation of random-coefficients logit models of demandâ, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 9:513-548.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Nevo, A. (2001), âMeasuring market power in the ready-to-eat cereal industryâ, Econometrica 69:307-342.
- OâBrien, D. and A. Wickelgren (2003), âA critical analysis of critical loss analysisâ, Antitrust Law Journal 71:161-184.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- OâBrien, D. and G. Shaffer (1992), âVertical control with bilateral contractsâ, RAND Journal of Economics 23:299-308.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- OâBrien, D. and S. Salop (2000), âCompetitive effects of partial ownership: Financial interest and corporate controlâ, Antitrust Law Journal 67:559-614.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Office of Fair Trading (2005), âEx post evaluation of mergersâ, March 2005, available at http://www.oft.gov.uk.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Parker, P.M. and L.-H. RÃller (1997), âCollusive conduct in duopolies: Multimarket contact and cross-ownership in the mobile telephone industryâ, RAND Journal of Economics 28:304322.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Perry, M. and R. Porter (1985), âOligopoly and the incentive for horizontal mergerâ, American Economic Review 75:219-227.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Pesendorfer, M. (2003), âHorizontal mergers in the paper industryâ, RAND Journal of Economics 34:495-515.
- Peters, C. (2003), âEvaluating the performance of merger simulation: Evidence from the U.S.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Pitofsky, R. (1999), âEfficiencies in defense of mergers: Two years afterâ, George Mason Law Review 7:485-493.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Porter, eds., Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. 3 (Elsevier Science Publishers, New York), forthcoming. Sutton, J. (2007), âMarket structure: Theory and evidenceâ, in: M. Armstrong and R. Porter, eds., Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. 3 (Elsevier Science Publishers, New York), forthcoming, available at http://personal.lse.ac.uk/SUTTON/market_structure_theory_evidence.pdf.
Porter, R. (1983), âA Study of cartel stability: The joint executive committee, 1880-1886â, Bell Journal of Economics 14:301-314.
- Porter, R. (2005), âDetecting collusionâ, Review of Industrial Organization 26:147-167.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Posner, R.A. (1969), âOligopoly and the antitrust laws: A suggested approachâ, Stanford Law Review 21:1562-1606.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Posner, R.A. (2001), Antitrust Law, 2nd ed. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Prager, R. and T. Hannan (1998), âDo substantial horizontal mergers generate significant price effects? Evidence from the banking industryâ, Journal of Industrial Economics 46:433452.
- Rasmusen, E., M. Ramseyer and J. Wiley (1991), âNaked exclusionâ, American Economic Review 81:1137-1145.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ravenscraft, D. and F.M. Scherer (1989), âThe profitability of mergersâ, International Journal of Industrial Organization 7:101-116.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Rey, P. and J. Tirole (2007), âA primer on foreclosureâ, in: M. Armstrong and R. Porter, eds., Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. 3 (Elsevier Science Publishers, New York), forthcoming, available at http://idei.fr/doc/by/tirole/primer.pdf.
- Robinson, J. (1933), The Economics of Imperfect Competition (Macmillan, London).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Robinson, M. (1985), âCollusion and the choice of auctionâ, RAND Journal of Economics 16:141-145.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Ross, T.W. (1992), âCartel stability and product differentiationâ, International Journal of Industrial Organization 10:1-13.
Rotemberg, J. and G. Saloner (1986), âA supergame-theoretic model of price wars during boomsâ, American Economic Review 76:390-407.
Rothschild, R. (1999), âCartel stability when costs are heterogeneousâ, International Journal of Industrial Organization 17:717-734.
Salant, S., S. Switzer and R. Reynolds (1983), âLosses from horizontal merger: The effects of an exogenous change in industry structure on Cournot-Nash equilibriumâ, Quarterly Journal of Economics 98:185-199.
- Salinger, M. (1990), âThe concentration-margins relationship reconsideredâ, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics 1990:287-321.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Salop, S. (1986), âPractices that (credibly) facilitate oligopoly co-ordinationâ, in: J. Stiglitz and G. Mathewson, eds. New Developments in the Analysis of Market Structure (MIT Press, Cambridge) 265-294.
- Salop, S. (2005), âQuestion: What is the real and proper antitrust welfare standard? Answer: The true consumer welfare standardâ, Statement before the Antitrust Modernization Commission, November 4, 2005.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Salop, S. and D. Scheffman (1983), âRaising rivalsâ costsâ, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 73(2):267-271.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Scharfstein, D. (1984), âA policy to prevent rational test-market predationâ, RAND Journal of Economics 15:229-243.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Schelling, T. (1960), The Strategy of Conflict (Harvard University Press, Cambridge).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Scherer, F.M. (1976), âPredatory pricing and the Sherman Act: A commentâ, Harvard Law Review 89:869-890.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Schmalensee and R. Willig, eds, Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. 1 (NorthHolland, Amsterdam) 537-596. Ordover, J. and R. Willig (1981), âAn economic definition of predation: Pricing and product innovationâ, Yale Law Journal 91:8-53.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Schmalensee and R. Willig, eds., Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. 1 (NorthHolland, Amsterdam) 415-473. Joskow, P. and A. Klevorick (1979), âA framework for analyzing predatory pricing policyâ, Yale Law Journal 89:213-270.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Schmalensee and R. Willig, eds., Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. 2 (NorthHolland, Amsterdam) 951-1009. Schmalensee, R. (2004), âSunk costs and antitrust barriers to entryâ, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 94(2):471-475.
- Schmalensee, R. and R. Willig, eds. (1989a), Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. 1 (North-Holland, Amsterdam).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Schmalensee, R. and R. Willig, eds. (1989b), Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. 2 (North-Holland, Amsterdam).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Segal, I. and M. Whinston (2000a), âExclusive contracts and protection of investmentsâ, RAND Journal of Economics 31:603-633.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Segal, I. and M. Whinston (2003), âRobust predictions for bilateral contracting with externalitiesâ, Econometrica 71:757-791.
Segal, I. and M. Whinston, (2000b), âNaked exclusion: Commentâ, American Economic Review 90:296-309.
- Selten, R. (1978), âThe chain-store paradoxâ, Theory and Decision 9:127-159.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Shapiro, C. (1986), âExchange of cost information in oligopolyâ, Review of Economic Studies 53:433-446.
Shapiro, C. (1989), âTheories of oligopoly behaviorâ, in: R. Schmalensee and R. Willig, eds., Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. 1 (North-Holland, Amsterdam) 329-414.
- Shapiro, C. (1996), âMergers with differentiated productsâ, Antitrust 10(2):23-30.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Smith, A. ([1776] 1970), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Books I-III (Penguin Books, London; first published 1776).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Snyder, C. (1996), âA dynamic theory of countervailing powerâ, RAND Journal of Economics 27:747-769.
- Spence, A.M. (1977), âEntry, capacity, investment and oligopolistic pricingâ, Bell Journal of Economics 8:534-544.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Spence, A.M. (1981), âThe learning curve and competitionâ, Bell Journal of Economics 12:4970.
- Standard Fashion Co. v. Magrane-Houston Co., 258 U.S. 346 (1922).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Standard Oil Co. of California (Standard Stations) v. United States, 337 U.S. 293 (1949).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States, 221 U.S. 1 (1911).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Stigler, G. (1964), âA theory of oligopolyâ, Journal of Political Economy 55:44-61.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Stole, L. (2007), âPrice discrimination and imperfect competitionâ, in: M. Armstrong and R.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Telser, L. (1966), âCutthroat competition and the long purseâ, Journal of Law and Economics 9:259-277.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Tirole, J. (1988), The Theory of Industrial Organization (MIT Press, Cambridge).
- Tirole, J. (2005), âThe analysis of tying cases: A primerâ, Competition Policy International 1(2):1-25.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Toys âRâ Us, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, 221 F.3d 928 (7th Cir. 2000).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of America, 148 F.2d 416 (2d Cir. 1945).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- United States v. AMR Corp., 335 F.3d 1109 (10th Cir. 2003).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- United States v. Container Corporation of America, 393 U.S. 333 (1969).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- United States v. Dentsply International, Inc., 399 F.3d 181 (3d Cir. 2005).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- United States v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 351 U.S. 377 (1956).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- United States v. General Dynamics Corp., 415 U.S. 486 (1974).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- United States v. Grinnell Corp., 384 U.S. 563 (1966).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- United States v. Microsoft Corp., 253 F. 3d. 34 (D.C. Cir. 2001).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- United States v. Microsoft Corp., 56 F.3d 1448 (D.C. Cir. 1995).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- United States v. Philadelphia National Bank, 374 U.S. 321 (1963).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- United States v. Vonâs Grocery Co., 384 U.S. 270 (1966).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Varian, H. (1989), âPrice discriminationâ, in: R. Schmalensee and R. Willig, eds., Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. 1 (North-Holland, Amsterdam) 597-654.
Vasconcelos, H. (2005), âTacit collusion, cost asymmetries, and mergersâ, RAND Journal of Economics 36:39-62.
Vickers, J. (2005), âAbuse of market powerâ, Economic Journal 115: F244-F261.
- Vita, M. and S. Sacher (2001), âThe competitive effects of not-for-profit hospital mergers: A case studyâ, Journal of Industrial Economics 49:63-84.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Vives, X. (2001), Oligopoly Pricing: Old Ideas, New Tools (MIT Press, Cambridge).
Waehrer, K. and M. Perry (2003), âThe effects of mergers in open-auction marketsâ, RAND Journal of Economics 34:287-304.
- Walle de Ghelcke, B. van de and G. van Gerven (2004), Competition Law of the European Community (Matthew Bender, New York).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Werden, G. (1996), âA robust test for consumer welfare enhancing mergers among sellers of differentiated productsâ, Journal of Industrial Economics 44:409-413.
- Werden, G. (2006), âIdentifying exclusionary conduct under Section 2: The âno economic senseâ testâ, Antitrust Law Journal 73:413-433.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Werden, G. and L. Froeb (1994), âThe effects of mergers in differentiated products industries: Logit demand and merger policyâ, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 10:407426.
- Werden, G. and L. Froeb (1998), âThe entry-inducing effect of horizontal mergers: An exploratory analysisâ, Journal of Industrial Economics 46:525-543.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Werden, G. and L. Froeb, (2007), âUnilateral competitive effects of horizontal mergersâ, in: P.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Werden, G., A. Joskow and R. Johnson (1991), âThe effects of mergers on price and output: Two case studies from the airline industryâ, Managerial and Decision Economics 12:341-352.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Whinston, M. (1990), âTying, foreclosure, and exclusionâ, American Economic Review 80:837859.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Whinston, M. (2006), Lectures on Antitrust Economics (MIT Press, Cambridge).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Williamson, O. (1968), âEconomies as an antitrust defense: The welfare trade-offsâ, American Economic Review 58:18-36.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Williamson, O. (1975), Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (New York, Free Press).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Williamson, O. (1977), âPredatory pricing: A strategic and welfare analysisâ, Yale Law Journal 87:284-340.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Williamson, O. (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (New York, Free Press).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Willig, eds, Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. 1 (North-Holland, Amsterdam) 475-535. Gilo, D., Y. Moshe and Y. Spiegel (2006), âPartial cross ownership and tacit collusionâ, RAND Journal of Economics 37:81-99.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Yamey, B. (1972), âPredatory price cutting: Notes and commentsâ, Journal of Law and Economics 15:129-142.
- Zerbe, R. and D. Cooper (1982), âAn empirical and theoretical comparison of alternative predation rulesâ, Texas Law Review 61:655-715.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now