[go: up one dir, main page]

login

Year-end appeal: Please make a donation to the OEIS Foundation to support ongoing development and maintenance of the OEIS. We are now in our 61st year, we have over 378,000 sequences, and we’ve reached 11,000 citations (which often say “discovered thanks to the OEIS”).

Revision History for A327160 (Bold, blue-underlined text is an addition; faded, red-underlined text is a deletion.)

Showing entries 1-10 | older changes
Number of positive integers that are reachable from n with some combination of transitions x -> usigma(x)-x and x -> gcd(x,usigma(x)), where usigma is the sum of unitary divisors of n (A034448).
(history; published version)
#15 by N. J. A. Sloane at Mon Aug 26 12:51:45 EDT 2019
STATUS

proposed

approved

#14 by Antti Karttunen at Sun Aug 25 16:20:24 EDT 2019
STATUS

editing

proposed

#13 by Antti Karttunen at Sun Aug 25 16:18:59 EDT 2019
CROSSREFS
#12 by Antti Karttunen at Sun Aug 25 16:05:17 EDT 2019
COMMENTS

Question: Is this sequence well defined for all every n ? If A318882 is not well defined in whole N, then neither this can be.

#11 by Antti Karttunen at Sun Aug 25 16:04:20 EDT 2019
EXAMPLE

From n = 30 we can reach any of the following strictly positive numbers: 30 (e.g., with an empty sequence of transitions), 42 (as A034460(30) = 42), 54 (as A034460(42) = 54; note that A034460(54) = 30 again) and 6 as A323166(30) = A323166(42) = A323166(54) = 6 = A323166(6), = A034460(6), thus a(30) = 4.

#10 by Antti Karttunen at Sun Aug 25 16:01:38 EDT 2019
EXAMPLE

From n = 30 we can reach any of the following strictly positive numbers: 30 (e.g., with an empty sequence of transitions), 42 (as A034460(30) = 42), 54 (as A034460(42) = 54; note that A034460(54) = 30 again) and 6 as A323166(30) = A323166(42) = A323166(54) = 6 = A323166(6), thus a(30) = 4.

#9 by Antti Karttunen at Sun Aug 25 15:33:57 EDT 2019
COMMENTS

Question: Is this sequence well defined for all n ? If A318882 is not well defined, in whole N, then neither this iscan be.

#8 by Antti Karttunen at Sun Aug 25 15:21:02 EDT 2019
COMMENTS

This Question: Is this sequence is well defined for all n > 1 provided that ? If A318882 is not well defined (all its terms have finite values), then neither this is.

#7 by Antti Karttunen at Sun Aug 25 15:09:37 EDT 2019
COMMENTS

Question: Is this This sequence is well defined for all n ?> 1 provided that A318882 is well defined (all its terms have finite values).

#6 by Antti Karttunen at Sun Aug 25 14:56:36 EDT 2019
COMMENTS

Question: Is this sequence well defined for all n ?