[go: up one dir, main page]

login

Year-end appeal: Please make a donation to the OEIS Foundation to support ongoing development and maintenance of the OEIS. We are now in our 61st year, we have over 378,000 sequences, and we’ve reached 11,000 citations (which often say “discovered thanks to the OEIS”).

Revision History for A137390 (Bold, blue-underlined text is an addition; faded, red-underlined text is a deletion.)

Showing entries 1-10 | older changes
Numbers k for which (9 + k!)/9 is prime.
(history; published version)
#48 by Bruno Berselli at Mon Feb 24 04:22:57 EST 2020
STATUS

reviewed

approved

#47 by Joerg Arndt at Mon Feb 24 04:21:40 EST 2020
STATUS

proposed

reviewed

#46 by Michel Marcus at Mon Feb 17 02:29:09 EST 2020
STATUS

editing

proposed

#45 by Michel Marcus at Mon Feb 17 02:29:03 EST 2020
EXTENSIONS

3562 a(11) from Dimitris Zygiridis (dmzyg70(AT)gmail.com), Jul 25 2008

11819 and 26737 a(12)-a(13) from Robert Price, Feb 10 2012

STATUS

proposed

editing

#44 by Jon E. Schoenfield at Sat Feb 08 10:55:48 EST 2020
STATUS

editing

proposed

#43 by Jon E. Schoenfield at Sat Feb 08 10:55:45 EST 2020
COMMENTS

The next number in the sequence, if one exists , is greater than 10944. - Robert Price, Mar 16 2010

STATUS

proposed

editing

#42 by Jinyuan Wang at Fri Feb 07 02:58:46 EST 2020
STATUS

editing

proposed

#41 by Jinyuan Wang at Fri Feb 07 02:58:11 EST 2020
CROSSREFS

Cf. nk!/m - 1 is a prime: A002982, A082671, A139056, A139199-A139205.

Cf. n(m + k!)/m + 1 is a prime: A002981, A082672, A089085, A139061, A139058, A139063, A139065, A151913, A139071.

STATUS

proposed

editing

Discussion
Fri Feb 07
02:58
Jinyuan Wang: well, for me both of them are okay
#40 by Jinyuan Wang at Thu Feb 06 19:25:02 EST 2020
STATUS

editing

proposed

Discussion
Thu Feb 06
20:52
Jianing Song: I see. So you have to change "n!/m +- 1" in the crossref to "(m + k!)/m too.
#39 by Jinyuan Wang at Thu Feb 06 19:24:57 EST 2020
COMMENTS

No other n k exists, for n k <= 6000. - Dimitris Zygiridis (dmzyg70(AT)gmail.com), Jul 25 2008

There are no other terms for n k < 26738. - Robert Price, Feb 10 2012

STATUS

reviewed

editing