User talk:Aurora

--Slade ♠ 16:33, 14 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to meta, and thank you very much for your translations, Aurora. It will be a great help for several language communities, not only Malay language speaking community :) if you have further interest, please consider

• listing yourself on m:Board elections/2007/Translations as coodrinators
• adding some Transbabel templates to show your interest as translator.

Please feel free to ask me a question, if any. Cheers, --Aphaia 06:59, 23 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Whoops... thank you. Done. ;o) --Paginazero - Ø 11:25, 24 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

I would like you all to prove that the vandal is really me. --אדמוןד ואודס_{自分の投稿記録} 07:44, 10 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Simply telling me that the CheckUser is your prove is not enough. You have to show me the result to prove. You can't just simply say things without proving it. And how can you be sure I have read SPR's answer? Whether I have read something, you can't see, can you? --אדמוןד ואודס_{自分の投稿記録} 14:22, 10 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have something else to tell you, please get ready to check your e-mail inbox. I do not want to expose in the public. Please reply me via e-mail as well. --אדמוןד ואודס_{自分の投稿記録} 16:04, 13 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yep, I'm sorry, but nobody made a note here :( --Nick1915 - ^{all you want} 10:53, 10 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

I am requesting usurpation on these projects (SUL util):

• tl wikipedia
• trwikibooks ...Aurora... 20:14, 7 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

i will follow your request.--Mardetanha ^talk 04:52, 26 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I renamed the unused account on Fa.wiki. You are all set now. Behaafarid 07:52, 26 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

...and it.wiktionary as well :D--Nick1915 - ^{all you want} 13:20, 28 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks ...Aurora... 01:07, 2 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

See this, please. Belanidia 13:45, 30 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Done, thanks for the notice. ...Aurora... 04:59, 31 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Sorry for responding so late, but I was in wiki-vacation. I have renamed the existing account, so you can now attach it to your global username. Sorry for any inconvenience! — KlaudiuMihăilă ^Message 18:23, 1 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

No problem. Thanks. ...Aurora... 07:53, 16 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Dear Aurora!

The required expectance time is elapsed, so I've just renamed account in Ru Wiki. You can now attach Ru Wiki to your SUL.

Dr Bug (Vladimir V. Medeyko) 10:10, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your request has been fulfilled. You can now take over the Aurora name. --Lerdsuwa 14:18, 9 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello, your request for SUL username usurpation has been approved. I changed the former username. Now tr:Kullanıcı:Aurora is free for you to attach it to your global account. --Mskyrider 15:53, 8 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

The account "Aurora" on tl.wiki is now available. --Bluemask 04:38, 12 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Tidak beri vote di sini? Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 03:05, 18 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yang lebih penting ialah adakah projek itu sedang berjalan di Incubator, bukannya jumlah undian. ...Aurora... 06:43, 6 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Bisa bantu perbaikan artikel Cheatsheet dalam Bahasa Melayu? Terima Kasih. Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 08:39, 5 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Ok. ...Aurora... 06:43, 6 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi! As member of this year's board election committe I would like to give you this barnstar for your help with the translations of the board election pages into Malay. It was very much appreciated! Jon Harald Søby 13:35, 1 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the barnstar :) ...Aurora... 14:45, 2 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi Aurora, just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatroll right to your account, as you are a trustworthy user. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Meta:Autopatrollers. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Ruy Pugliesi^◥ 15:18, 2 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Cool. ...Aurora... 01:14, 4 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I would like to know your opinion on using ia. Should we stick to rules or convention? Let me know your opinion. --Diagramma Della Verita 04:28, 6 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Ops...it was my mistake. Didn't realise that ia can be use as kata ganti benda yang dibicarakan. Sorry for that error. --Diagramma Della Verita 04:48, 6 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Ok. ...Aurora... 15:07, 29 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi! I just want to thank you and give you this barnstar for your help with the translation of the 2011 fundraiser! The fundraiser was the best we ever had, both in terms of the amount we collected and in terms of number of translations. We couldn't have done either one without the help we got from you and other translators. If you are interested, we made a report, which has some statistics about the translations.

And: I have one more request, and that is that you take this survey. You may have got an e-mail about it, and if you did, please ignore this. But if you didn't it would be great if you would take this survey too, so we can learn to improve the translation experience.

Again, thanks for your help with translations – you're awesome! Jon Harald Søby (WMF) 13:26, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi Aurora,

Along with more hundreds of others, you recently signed Letter to Wikimedia Foundation: Superprotect and Media Viewer, which I wrote.

Today, we have 562 signatures here on Meta, and another 61 on change.org, for a total of 623 signatures. Volunteers have fully translated it into 16 languages, and begun other translations. This far exceeds my most optimistic hopes about how many might sign the letter -- I would have been pleased to gain 200 siguatures -- but new signatures continue to come.

I believe this is a significant moment for Wikimedia and Wikipedia. Very rarely have I seen large numbers of people from multiple language and project communities speak with a unified voice. As I understand it, we are unified in a desire for the Wikimedia Foundation to respect -- in actions, in addition to words -- the will of the community who has built the Wikimedia projects for the benefit of all humanity. I strongly believe it is possible to innovate and improve our software tools, together with the Wikimedia Foundation. But substantial changes are necessary in order for us to work together smoothly and productively. I believe this letter identifies important actions that will strongly support those changes.

Have you been discussing these issues in your local community? If so, I think we would all appreciate an update (on the letter's talk page) about how those discussions have gone, and what people are saying. If not, please be bold and start a discussoin on your Village Pump, or in any other venue your project uses -- and then leave a summary of what kind of response you get on the letter's talk page.

Finally, what do you think is the right time, and the right way, to deliver this letter? We could set a date, or establish a threshold of signatures. I have some ideas, but am open to suggestions.

Thank you for your engagement on this issue, and please stay in touch. -Pete F (talk) 18:42, 26 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Dear Aurora, since you are an administrator on a wiki from which no user participated in this discussion, I'd like to make sure you are aware of some recent events which may alter what the Wikimedia Foundation lets you do on your wiki: Superprotect.

• Request for comment: Requests for comment/Superprotect rights
• An open letter about its implementation: Letter to Wikimedia Foundation: Superprotect and Media Viewer

Peteforsyth 09:06, 12 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Quote: "since you are an administrator on a wiki from which no user participated in this discussion", but right above there is "Along with more hundreds of others, you recently signed Letter to Wikimedia Foundation: Superprotect and Media Viewer". Kinda contradictory, doesn't it :? ...Aurora... (talk) 09:13, 24 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I hope I am not bothering you. I just want to inform you about a possibilty here on meta. After the SUL finalization, a search for Global_renamers has been going on.

Maybe you knew already, because you help with the translation of some SUL pages here on meta in your main language. As I did with other local bureaucrats on "minor" projects or with knowledge of "minor"/"uncommon" languages, I am contacting you in the case you are interested to ask for this flag.

At the moment in m:Global_renamers#Users_with_global_rename_access and m:Stewards#List_of_current_stewards, if I correctly remember there is only one user who is ms>3, and that is not enough for the number of potential and active users speaking Bahasa Melayu in the world. if you take a look in Global_permissions#Requests_for_global_rename_permissions and in the chronology of the page you can verify that even users with limited cross-wiki activity or limited knowledge of foreign languages have been proposed and approved in the previous months. I think that with your impressive cross-wiki experience and your previous local experience as a bureaucrats (noone has experience from wikispecies) you could be useful.

Please notice that I am not an expert user on meta nor a local bureaucrat, I just care about the "variety" of the meta environment and I though that it was useful to inform some local bureaucrats of the opportunity. Have a nice day! --Alexmar983 (talk) 20:20, 4 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the notice. ...Aurora... (talk) 07:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi! You voted for improving plagiarism detection as an important suggestions in the community wishlist survey last year. I'm pinging people who showed interest in that task to tell them we have some suggestions for how things could look, if you'd like to glance at them and give us some feedback. They're available here: phab:T120435#2266283. It's easiest if comments are left in Phabricator, since that's where much of the development is happening, but they can be left on Meta too, of course. /Johan (WMF) (talk) 17:20, 13 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi,

You’re getting this message because you participated in the 2015 Community Wishlist Survey and we want to make sure you don't miss it this year – or at least can make the conscious choice to ignore if it you want to. The 2015 survey decided what the Community Tech team should work on during 2016. It was also the focus of Wikimedia hackathons and work by other developers. You can see the status of wishes from the 2015 wishlist at 2015 Community Wishlist Survey/Results.

The 2016 Community Wishlist Survey is now open for wishes. You can create proposals until November 20. You will be able to vote on which wishes you think are best or most important between November 28 and December 12. /Johan (WMF) (talk) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:17, 14 November 2016 (UTC)Reply