Grants talk:Programs/Wikimedia Community Fund/Rapid Fund/CiteCheck:An AI-Driven Fact-Checking Assistant for Wikimedia Projects (ID: 22675178)
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 2 months ago by HaeB in topic Comments and questions from I JethroBT (WMF)
Comments and questions from I JethroBT (WMF)
[edit]@Azermite and Ocaasi: Thanks for your proposal to support the developnent of CiteCheck. When reviewing proposals for software/tool development, we have some general questions we ask for general eligibility, in addition to having technical staff at the Wikimedia Foundation conduct a general review of the proposal. Please see the eligibility questions below:
- Is the code to be public and under an OSI-approved free software license?
- Will the project have multiple maintainers / planners? I understand that the project will be supported by two advisors, but what is the longer-term maintenance plan for the tool?
- Is there documentation planned? Where will this be made available?
With thanks, I JethroBT (WMF) (talk) 18:44, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hi I JethroBT (WMF). Here are answers to your questions, direct from Salim (who is still finding his way around Meta)
- Yes the project is open source. It's under an MIT license.
- Yes, Salim will continue to maintain the code while James Hare and Kevin Payravi be backup maintainers should Salim be unavailable..
- Yes. Documentation will be provided in github and also the official website. Also we will create a Meta-Wikimedia page for easier access and promotion.
- Please let me know if you need any other information! Cheers, Ocaasi (talk) 23:19, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Now that an initial version of the user script has been live for a few weeks at w:User:Azermite/citecheck.js, is the underlying (server-side) source code available already? (I assume it differs from the browser extension version presented at the hackathon.) Regards, HaeB (talk) 06:17, 21 August 2024 (UTC)