Disputatio Usoris:71.208.209.152

Salve usor ignote! — Vin tu usor cum nomine hic fieri? Itan? ... macte, imprime hic ! Català | Deutsch | English | Español | Esperanto | Français | Italiano | Magyar | Nederlands | Norsk | Polski | Română | Pусский | Suomi | Svenska | Türkçe

Latinitas tua haud mala est! Inspice emendationes quas feci in opera tua. ( noli uti numeris Romanis =] ) --Ioshus ^(disp) 02:38, 22 Martii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cur in Portmanteau contenta delevisti?--Ioshus ^(disp) 05:02, 25 Martii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non scio, sed ... fortasse quia hic usor consentit mihi (vide disputatio:Portmanteau) haec exempla Latina et Graeca non vere verba portmanteau esse? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:46, 25 Martii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scribis recte. Haec exempla non portmanteau sunt, non fusa sunt ex duobus verbis, sed simpliciter composita. Iam melius verba huius generis intellego. Gratias ago.

Missa ab deis?!--Ioshus ^(disp) 03:53, 27 Martii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Planetae?!--Ioshus ^(disp) 04:34, 27 Martii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cur non responsa des?--Ioshus ^(disp) 05:22, 27 Martii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

quod difficile est Latine scribere. Malisne nomen graecum? Parvi mihi interest.71.208.209.152 05:26, 27 Martii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, iam 'planetam' habemus, that changes everything. 71.208.209.152 06:09, 27 Martii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So you prefer if I talk with you in english? We seem to have similar interest in pages, but we do not seem to agree on content. Nothing I have read in several dictionaries suggests planets are monsters... Absolutely nothing suggests monsters need be sent by god (or gods)... and why would you change the general "conjoined twins" to a specific "double headed calf"? That word should come in the picture description.

There was another page I wanted to talk to you about, but I forget, now!--Ioshus ^(disp) 17:45, 27 Martii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A reasonable objection. It really doesn't read right. Planets aren't monsters. It's on my list of things to fix. 71.208.209.152 18:28, 27 Martii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

me etiam delectat! =] That's why i started the page. Brice is one of my favorite early American authors.--Ioshus ^(disp) 19:38, 27 Martii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And, dude, if you're gonna stick around here, why don't you except the {{invitatio}} above and become a registered user?--Ioshus ^(disp) 19:43, 27 Martii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Again: PLEASE go to en:whatever and add a latin link. I have done this on at least 10 of the pages you have created. PLEASE allow me to do my own work instead of cleaning up yours!--Ioshus ^(disp) 03:13, 30 Martii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you for adding those and for the notification. For the record, since you left the first message I have not omitted en:whatever on any relevant page. 71.208.209.152 03:44, 30 Martii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm enjoying all your additions to Wikipedia. When you want to move a page -- even a minor move like "Hyginus papa" to "Hyginus Papa" -- it's very important (and easy!) to do it the proper way: click on the "Movere" tab. That way, the talk page gets moved as well (which didn't happen in that case, which is why I thought to mention it). It's not only the talk page: this method is also essential for interwiki housekeeping to function correctly.

If it's ever impossible to make such a move (because there is already a redirect at the destination name, for example) you can ask an administrator to delete the unwanted redirect, thus making the move possible. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:36, 30 Martii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. Thanks for the explanation. In retrospect, I figured there had to be a better way to take care of the 'Hyginus' lemma issue. As you can tell, I'm still figuring out how everything works, but I hope to keep blunders to a minimum. I enjoy reading your contributions as well.--71.208.209.152 16:40, 30 Martii 2007 (UTC)[reply]