[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/str/wpaper/1201.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Bayesian Spatial Individual Effects Probit Model of the 2010 U.K. General Election

Author

Listed:
  • Christa Jensen

    (Regional Research Institute, Department of Economics, West Virginia University)

  • Donald Lacombe

    (Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University)

  • Stuart McIntyre

    (Department of Economics, University of Strathclyde)

Abstract
The Conservative Party emerged from the 2010 United Kingdom General Election as the largest single party, but their support was not geographically uniform. In this paper, we estimate a hierarchical Bayesian spatial probit model that tests for the presence of regional voting effects. This model allows for the estimation of individual region-specific effects on the probability of Conservative Party success, incorporating information on the spatial relationships between the regions of the mainland United Kingdom. After controlling for a range of important covariates, we find that these spatial relationships are significant and that our individual region-specific effects estimates provide additional evidence of North-South variations in Conservative Party support.

Suggested Citation

  • Christa Jensen & Donald Lacombe & Stuart McIntyre, 2012. "A Bayesian Spatial Individual Effects Probit Model of the 2010 U.K. General Election," Working Papers 1201, University of Strathclyde Business School, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:str:wpaper:1201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.strath.ac.uk/media/1newwebsite/departmentsubject/economics/research/researchdiscussionpapers/2012/12-01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    United Kingdom General Election; Bayesian hierarchical modelling; spatial econometrics;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C11 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Bayesian Analysis: General
    • C21 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:str:wpaper:1201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirsty Hall (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/edstruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.