[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ris/sphedp/2009_207.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Predicatul Economic Al Acţiunii Umane

Author

Listed:
  • Camelia Baltaretu Georgiana Chitiga, Ene Dinga Elena Padurean

    (Romanian Academy, Centre for Financial and Monetary Research Victor Slavescu)

Abstract
The economic process is a kind (that is, a species) of the general human action. In the paper is studied the logical possibility to define the “economic” attribute of the general human action, in an attempt to identify the sufficient conditions to have an economic process among the human processes. In order to define the “economic” attribute, the economic process or act are approached and assessed. In this way, the authors propose three such sufficient predicates of the “economic” attribute, and analyze the logical consequences of them. These results are aimed to build a philosophical base in order to allow the defining of the economic subject as well as of the economic object.

Suggested Citation

  • Camelia Baltaretu Georgiana Chitiga, Ene Dinga Elena Padurean, 2010. "Predicatul Economic Al Acţiunii Umane," Papers 2009/207, Osterreichish-Rumanischer Akademischer Verein.
    • Handle: RePEc:ris:sphedp:2009_207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    economic; process;

    JEL classification:

    • A11 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Role of Economics; Role of Economists

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:sphedp:2009_207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Brindusa Covaci (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ffuspro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.