[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/53119.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Was Proposition 4 Really a Tax Reduction Mirage? A Correction and Reinterpretation of Earlier Findings

Author

Listed:
  • Cebula, Richard
Abstract
An earlier study published in this Journal by Cebula and Chevlin finds that the passage of a tax-expenditure limitation (TEL) statute in all of the 50 states would not have resulted in a reduction in the per capita levels of both spending and taxes. The present study takes issue with this finding. In particular, using the same data as Cebula and Chevlin, it is demonstrated here that, by applying the formula for statistically significant means, the existence of Proposition 4 or its equivalent in each of the 50 states would have, in theory, resulted in a statistically significant reduction in both per capita nominal state plus local government spending and taxes.

Suggested Citation

  • Cebula, Richard, 1985. "Was Proposition 4 Really a Tax Reduction Mirage? A Correction and Reinterpretation of Earlier Findings," MPRA Paper 53119, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:53119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/53119/1/MPRA_paper_53119.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard J. Cebula & Linda Chevlin, 1981. "Proposition 4, Tax Reduction Mirage: An Exploratory Note on Its Potential Spending and Tax Impacts," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(4), pages 343-348, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richard J. Cebula, 1987. "Was Proposition 4 Really a Tax Reduction Mirage?A Correction and Reinterpretation of Previous Findings," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 107-108, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    public spending; tax burdens; Proposition 4; tax-expenditure limitation legislation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H24 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies
    • H71 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
    • H72 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Budget and Expenditures

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:53119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.