[Liberty - between reason and skepticism]"> [Liberty - between reason and skepticism]"> [Liberty - between reason and skep">
[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/43542.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Frihed mellem fornuft og skepsis
[Liberty - between reason and skepticism]

Author

Listed:
  • Kurrild-Klitgaard, Peter
Abstract
The paper sketches an argument for a classical liberal view of the "natural rights" of life, liberty, property and the pursuit of happiness, albeit one based in a semi-"rule-utilitarian" approach, where the defense is based in a "hypothetical imperative" and circumscribed by what social science can tell us that we know and what we cannot know.

Suggested Citation

  • Kurrild-Klitgaard, Peter, 2012. "Frihed mellem fornuft og skepsis [Liberty - between reason and skepticism]," MPRA Paper 43542, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:43542
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/43542/1/MPRA_paper_43542.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Epstein, Richard A., 2003. "Skepticism and Freedom," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, edition 1, number 9780226213040, December.
    2. Kurrild-Klitgaard, Peter, 1998. "The constitutional dilemma of European integration," MPRA Paper 35437, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. von Mises, Ludwig, 1957. "Theory and History," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, edition 1, number mises1957.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kurrild-Klitgaard, Peter, 2023. "Ytringsfriheden og dens nyautoritære fjender [Freedom of speech and its neo-authoritarian enemies]," MPRA Paper 118931, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Calcagno, Peter T. & Hall, Joshua C. & Lawson, Robert A., 2010. "Objectivism versus subjectivism: A market test," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 445-448, November.
    2. Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard, 2004. "Ulysses and the Rent-Seekers: The Benefits and Challenges of Constitutional Constraints on Leviathan," Advances in Austrian Economics, in: The Dynamics of Intervention: Regulation and Redistribution in the Mixed Economy, pages 245-278, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    3. Benson Bruce L., 2000. "Jurisdictional Choice in International Trade: Implications for Lex Cybernatoria," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 3-32, March.
    4. Christmas Billy, 2020. "The Neoliberal Turn: Libertarian Justice and Public Policy," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 26(1), pages 1-031, June.
    5. Mackintosh, Kenneth H., 1998. "Bargaining policies and social exchange: Review of a neglected concept," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 565-585.
    6. Bruce Benson, 2018. "The institutional determinants of self-governance: a comment on Edward Stringham’s Private Governance," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 31(2), pages 209-230, June.
    7. Victor I. Espinosa & Miguel A. Alonso Neira & Jesús Huerta de Soto, 2021. "Principles of Sustainable Economic Growth and Development: A Call to Action in a Post-COVID-19 World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-14, November.
    8. Don Lavoie & Virgil Storr, 2011. "Distinction or dichotomy: Rethinking the line between thymology and praxeology," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 24(2), pages 213-233, June.
    9. Cubeddu Raimondo & Masala Antonio, 2001. "Natural Right, Providence, and Order: Frédéric Bastiat's Laissez-Faire," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 11(2), pages 1-28, June.
    10. Viktor Vanberg, 2014. "James M. Buchanan’s contractarianism and modern liberalism," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 18-38, March.
    11. Stringham Edward P & Gonzales R., 2009. "The Role of Empirical Assumptions in Economic Analysis: On Facts and Counterfactuals in Economic Law," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Leland B. Yeager, 1985. "Rights, Contract, and Utility in Policy Espousal," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 5(1), pages 259-294, Spring/Su.
    13. Pavel Chalupnicek, 2010. "The CAPITAL in Social Capital: An Austrian Perspective," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(4), pages 1230-1250, October.
    14. Boettke Peter, 1990. "The Political Economy Of Utopia : Communism In Soviet Russia, 1918–1921," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 1(2), pages 91-138, June.
    15. Richard Ebeling, 2023. "Carl menger on economic policy: “Exact laws,” institutional prerequisites, and economic liberalism," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 36(2), pages 331-355, June.
    16. Luisa Montuschi, 2013. "Progreso social, crecimiento y bienestar," CEMA Working Papers: Serie Documentos de Trabajo. 533, Universidad del CEMA.
    17. Steven Horwitz, 2001. "Comment on Boettke and Subrick and Faulkner," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 81-86.
    18. Robert F. Mulligan, 2013. "The enduring allure of objective probability," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 26(3), pages 311-327, September.
    19. Thierry Aimar, 2009. "The curious destiny of a heterodoxy: The Austrian economic tradition," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 22(3), pages 199-207, September.
    20. Liggio Leonard P., 1995. "in Memoriam," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 3-10, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Freedom; liberty; natural rights; classical liberalism; libertarianism; utilitarianism;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D71 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations
    • D7 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making
    • P14 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Property Rights
    • P1 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies
    • P16 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Capitalist Institutions; Welfare State

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:43542. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.