[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/kob/dpaper/dp2021-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Bargaining Set and Coalition Formation

Author

Listed:
  • Ken-Ichi Shimomura

    (Research Institute for Economics and Business Administration(RIEB), Kobe University, JAPAN)

Abstract
We address the problem of predicting how rational agents will form coalitions in a nontransferable utility game, and within each coalition how they will allocate the gains obtained through cooperation. To answer these questions, we propose solution concepts according to which the coalition structure and the payoff allocations are simultaneously determined. We prove the nonemptiness and partial efficiency of the steady bargaining set, a refinement of the Zhou bargaining set, for at least one coalition structure under the restrictive non-crossing condition. In addition, we show the nonemptiness and possible inefficiency of the Mas-Colell bargaining set if this condition is not assumed.

Suggested Citation

  • Ken-Ichi Shimomura, 2021. "The Bargaining Set and Coalition Formation," Discussion Paper Series DP2021-15, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    • Handle: RePEc:kob:dpaper:dp2021-15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rieb.kobe-u.ac.jp/academic/ra/dp/English/DP2021-15.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2021
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chang, Chih & Lee, Yuh Jye, 1993. "A non-weakly balanced game with non-empty bargaining set," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 195-198.
    2. Demuynck, Thomas & Potoms, Tom, 2020. "Weakening transferable utility: The case of non-intersecting Pareto curves," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    3. Peleg, Bezalel, 1985. "An axiomatization of the core of cooperative games without side payments," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 203-214, April.
    4. Elena Iñarra & Roberto Serrano & Ken-Ichi Shimomura, 2020. "The Nucleolus, the Kernel, and the Bargaining Set: An Update," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 71(2), pages 225-266.
    5. AUMANN, Robert J. & DREZE, Jacques H., 1974. "Cooperative games with coalition structures," LIDAM Reprints CORE 217, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    6. Border, Kim C, 1984. "A Core Existence Theorem for Games without Ordered Preferences," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 52(6), pages 1537-1542, November.
    7. Lloyd S. Shapley, 1967. "On balanced sets and cores," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 453-460.
    8. Vohra, Rajiv, 1991. "An existence theorem for a bargaining set," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 19-34.
    9. Morton Davis & Michael Maschler, 1965. "The kernel of a cooperative game," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(3), pages 223-259, September.
    10. Zhou Lin, 1994. "A New Bargaining Set of an N-Person Game and Endogenous Coalition Formation," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 6(3), pages 512-526, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chiara Donnini & Marialaura Pesce, 2023. "Fairness and formation rules of coalitions," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 19(4), pages 933-960, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sun, Ning & Trockel, Walter & Yang, Zaifu, 2008. "Competitive outcomes and endogenous coalition formation in an n-person game," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(7-8), pages 853-860, July.
    2. Fatma Aslan & Papatya Duman & Walter Trockel, 2019. "Duality for General TU-games Redefined," Working Papers CIE 121, Paderborn University, CIE Center for International Economics.
    3. Elena Iñarra & Roberto Serrano & Ken-Ichi Shimomura, 2020. "The Nucleolus, the Kernel, and the Bargaining Set: An Update," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 71(2), pages 225-266.
    4. László Á. Kóczy, 2018. "Partition Function Form Games," Theory and Decision Library C, Springer, number 978-3-319-69841-0, September.
    5. Michel Le Breton & Karine Van Der Straeten, 2017. "Alliances Électorales et Gouvernementales : La Contribution de la Théorie des Jeux Coopératifs à la Science Politique," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 127(4), pages 637-736.
    6. William Thomson, 2007. "On the existence of consistent rules to adjudicate conflicting claims: a constructive geometric approach," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 11(3), pages 225-251, November.
    7. Grabisch, Michel & Sudhölter, Peter, 2018. "On a class of vertices of the core," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 541-557.
    8. Montero, M.P., 2002. "Two-Stage Bargaining with Reversible Coalitions : The Case of Apex Games," Other publications TiSEM 7dba0283-bc13-4f2c-8f5e-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. Pedro Calleja & Francesc Llerena & Peter Sudhölter, 2020. "Monotonicity and Weighted Prenucleoli: A Characterization Without Consistency," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(3), pages 1056-1068, August.
    10. Montero, Maria, 2002. "Non-cooperative bargaining in apex games and the kernel," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 309-321, November.
    11. Toru Hokari & Yukihiko Funaki & Peter Sudhölter, 2020. "Consistency, anonymity, and the core on the domain of convex games," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 24(3), pages 187-197, December.
    12. Dietzenbacher, Bas & Borm, Peter & Hendrickx, Ruud, 2017. "The procedural egalitarian solution," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 179-187.
    13. Dietzenbacher, Bas & Yanovskaya, Elena, 2023. "The equal split-off set for NTU-games," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 61-67.
    14. Lin Zhou, 1991. "A Refined Bargaining Set of an n-Person Game and Endogenous Coalition Formation," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 974, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    15. Yang, Jian & Li, Jianbin, 2020. "Cooperative game with nondeterministic returns," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 123-140.
    16. Michel Grabisch, 2013. "The core of games on ordered structures and graphs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 204(1), pages 33-64, April.
    17. Álvarez-Mozos, Mikel & Ehlers, Lars, 2024. "Externalities and the (pre)nucleolus in cooperative games," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 10-15.
    18. Jingang Zhao, 2018. "A Reexamination of the Coase Theorem," The Journal of Mechanism and Institution Design, Society for the Promotion of Mechanism and Institution Design, University of York, vol. 3(1), pages 111-132, December.
    19. Camelia Bejan & Juan Camilo Gómez & Anne van den Nouweland, 2022. "On the importance of reduced games in axiomatizing core extensions," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 59(3), pages 637-668, October.
    20. Michela Chessa & Vito Fragnelli, 2014. "The bargaining set for sharing the power," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 215(1), pages 49-61, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Nontransferable utility game; Coalition structure; Bargaining set; Restrictive non-crossing condition;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C71 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Cooperative Games
    • D71 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kob:dpaper:dp2021-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Office of Promoting Research Collaboration, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rikobjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.