[Les négociations sur l'agriculture dans le cycle de Doha de l'Organisation mondiale du commerce : situation et perspectives]"> [Les négociations sur l'agriculture dans le cycle de Doha de l'Organisation mondiale du commerce : situation et perspectives]">
[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02682035.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The negotiations on agriculture in the Doha development agenda round : current status and future prospects
[Les négociations sur l'agriculture dans le cycle de Doha de l'Organisation mondiale du commerce : situation et perspectives]

Author

Listed:
  • Giovanni Anania

    (Inconnu)

  • Jean-Christophe J.-C. Bureau

    (ECO-PUB - Economie Publique - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - INA P-G - Institut National Agronomique Paris-Grignon)

Abstract
Dans l'article introductif d'une série de travaux sur les négociations commerciales, les auteurs synthétisent les avancées des négociations sur l'agriculture dans le cadre de l'Organisation mondiale du commerce depuis 1994. Ils présentent les divers points d'achoppement qui ont jusqu'ici empêché un accord. Ils montrent aussi la convergence qui a été peu à peu obtenue sur certains dossiers, et en particulier les points décidés lors de l'accord cadre de juillet 2004.

Suggested Citation

  • Giovanni Anania & Jean-Christophe J.-C. Bureau, 2005. "The negotiations on agriculture in the Doha development agenda round : current status and future prospects [Les négociations sur l'agriculture dans le cycle de Doha de l'Organisation mondiale du co," Post-Print hal-02682035, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02682035
    DOI: 10.1093/erae/jbi029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giovanni Anania, 2007. "Multilateral trade negotiations, preferential trade agreements and European Union’s agricultural policies," QA - Rivista dell'Associazione Rossi-Doria, Associazione Rossi Doria, issue 3, July.
    2. Anania, Giovanni, 2007. "Multilateral Negotiations, Preferential Trade Agreements and the CAP. What's Ahead?," Working Papers 7283, TRADEAG - Agricultural Trade Agreements.
    3. Perali, Federico & Pieroni, Luca & Standardi, Gabriele, 2012. "World tariff liberalization in agriculture: An assessment using a global CGE trade model for EU15 regions," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 155-180.
    4. Moon, Wanki, 2010. "Multifunctional Agriculture, Protectionism, And Prospect Of Trade Liberalization," Journal of Rural Development/Nongchon-Gyeongje, Korea Rural Economic Institute, vol. 33(2), pages 1-33, July.
    5. Gohin, Alexandre, 2008. "La sélection des produits agricoles sensibles : le cas européen," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 87(2).
    6. Malhotra Nisha & Rus Horatiu & Kassam Shinan, 2008. "Antidumping Duties in the Agriculture Sector: Trade Restricting or Trade Deflecting?," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 8(2), pages 1-19, June.
    7. Moon, Wanki, 2011. "Is agriculture compatible with free trade?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 13-24.
    8. Petit, Michel & Ilbert, Helene, 2015. "Geographic Indicators and Rural Development in North Africa Implications for TTIP Negotiations," 145th Seminar, April 14-15, 2015, Parma, Italy 200231, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Banović, Marija & Ševarlić, Miladin M., 2013. "The EU Meat Market and the Doha Round at a Glance," 135th Seminar, August 28-30, 2013, Belgrade, Serbia 160371, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Gabriele Standardi & Federico Perali & Luca Pieroni, 2014. "World Tariff Liberalization in Agriculture: An Assessment Following a Global CGE Trade Model for EU15 Regions," Working Papers 2014.25, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    11. Philippidis, George & Hubbard, Lionel J. & Renwick, Alan W., 2006. "A CGE Analysis of the Harbinson Proposal: Outcomes for the EU25," Working Papers 45992, Scotland's Rural College (formerly Scottish Agricultural College), Land Economy & Environment Research Group.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    DOHA ROUND; Production et marchés;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02682035. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.