[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fip/fedlwp/2015-008.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Experience of the RePEc Plagiarism Committee in Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Zimmermann
Abstract
RePEc is an open bibliography project driven entirely by volunteers and without a budget. It was created to enhance the dissemination of research in economics by making it more accessible to authors, publishers, and readers: 1800 publishers participate in this initiative, and 44000 authors are registered. Some of those authors became frustrated when their work was plagiarized and no action was taken. Many have asked whether RePEc could take action. The RePEc Plagiarism Committee was created to respond to this request. Because RePEc has no enforcement power, it can only ?name and shame? verified offenders. This essay discusses the experience over the first years of the Committee.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Zimmermann, 2015. "The Experience of the RePEc Plagiarism Committee in Economics," Working Papers 2015-8, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
    • Handle: RePEc:fip:fedlwp:2015-008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://research.stlouisfed.org/wp/2015/2015-008.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shumilov, A. & Balatsky, E., 2016. "RePEc Academic Rankings: Construction Issues and the Role of Russian Participants," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 32(4), pages 111-138.
    2. Shumilov, Andrei & Balatsky, Evgeny, 2016. "Академические рейтинги RePEc: вопросы построения и роль российских участников [RePEc Academic Rankings: Construction Issues and the Role of Russian Participants]," MPRA Paper 70956, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Plagiarism; academic literature; naming and shaming; economics;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A13 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Social Values
    • A14 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Sociology of Economics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Lists

    This item is featured on the following reading lists, Wikipedia, or ReplicationWiki pages:
    1. Papers using RePEc data

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fedlwp:2015-008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anna Oates (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frbslus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.