[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ess/wpaper/id1793.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Common Guidelines for Watershed Development Projects

Author

Listed:
  • Government of India GOI
Abstract
This is an initiative by the Planning Commission to formulate “Common Guidelines for Watershed Development Projects in order to have a unified perspective by all ministries.These guidelines are therefore applicable to all watershed development projects in all Departments / Ministries of Government of India concerned with Watershed Development Projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Government of India GOI, 2008. "Common Guidelines for Watershed Development Projects," Working Papers id:1793, eSocialSciences.
    • Handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:1793
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.eSocialSciences.com/data/articles/Document1812200890.6061823.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. V. S. Saravanan & Geoffrey T. McDonald & Peter P. Mollinga, 2009. "Critical review of Integrated Water Resources Management: Moving beyond polarised discourse," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 33(1), pages 76-86, February.
    2. Richard Ackermann, 2012. "New Directions for Water Management in Indian Agriculture," Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, Emerging Markets Forum, vol. 4(2), pages 227-288, May.
    3. Saravanan, V.S., 2010. "Negotiating participatory irrigation management in the Indian Himalayas," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(5), pages 651-658, May.
    4. Jean‐Philippe Venot & Floriane Clement, 2013. "Justice in development? An analysis of water interventions in the rural South," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 37(1), pages 19-30, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    watershed; develoment; ministries; India; government; institutions; programme; livelihood; cluster approach; forest departments;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:1793. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Padma Prakash (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.esocialsciences.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.