[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehs/wpaper/16013.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Palm oil industry 1970-2010: Do we see a flying geese pattern emerging?

Author

Listed:
  • Lars Bruno

    (Norwegian Business School)

Abstract
"Palm oil has been one of the fastest growing agricultural sectors the past half a century. Today palm oil is the most traded and produced vegetable oil in the world, and is used in a large number of products.1 Its legacy would at first glance seem mixed. On the one hand, it has been criticized for leading to the destruction of rainforests in Indonesia and Malaysia. On the other hand, palm oil has lifted many out of poverty in these two countries.2 Despite this mixed legacy, the palm oil sector is likely to expand in the future. The nature of its future expansion is crucially dependent on the direction of technological progress and innovation. For instance, a new technology, which allows for more palm oil extraction per tree, could lead to less land being required to meet demand thereby limiting the impact on the environment. In addition, such improvements could lead to a more profitable industry, which could lead to increased welfare for countries producing palm oil. The level of technology largely determines a country’s comparative advantage, as seemingly is also the case in the palm oil industry. Malaysia has since the 1960s moved from mainly exporting crude palm oil to exporting the higher value added processed palm oil in the 1970s and eventually created more forward linkages to food processing, chemicals and biodiesel since the 1980s. This gradual increase in value-added has made Malaysia the technological leader within the industry. Indonesia, however, has recently overtaken Malaysia in both production and exports of palm oil. The high growth of the Indonesian palm oil sector has been driven primarily by increased exports of crude palm oil. The paper uses a flying-geese framework to analyse the nature of dynamic comparative advantage in the palm oil sector. The literature on the palm oil sector has thus far focused mainly on revealed comparative advantage and the linkages of palm oil in the two countries by themselves. This paper instead focuses on the interdependency of Indonesia and Malaysia and analyses the comparative advantage in both countries over time. This paper first introduces the international palm oil market and its ascendency. The second and third parts give a brief overview of the history of the palm oil sector in the two largest producers, Indonesia and Malaysia. In the fourth part the flying-geese framework is explained and attempted to fit the palm oil sector. In the fifth part the comparative advantage of Indonesia and Malaysia are compared to analyse whether these fit with the prediction of the flying geese theory."

Suggested Citation

  • Lars Bruno, 2016. "Palm oil industry 1970-2010: Do we see a flying geese pattern emerging?," Working Papers 16013, Economic History Society.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehs:wpaper:16013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ehs.org.uk/dotAsset/d08324cd-fefd-41b9-8828-5cf8157ed2b7.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Larson, Donald F., 1996. "Indonesia's palm oil subsector," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1654, The World Bank.
    2. Kumagai, Satoru, 2008. "A journey through the secret history of the Flying Geese Model," IDE Discussion Papers 158, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    3. Alemayehu Geda & Atnafu Meskel, 2008. "China and India's Growth Surge: Is it a curse or blessing for Africa? The Case of Manufactured Exports," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 20(2), pages 247-272.
    4. Raymond Vernon, 1966. "International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 80(2), pages 190-207.
    5. Pletcher, James, 1991. "Regulation with growth: The political economy of palm oil in Malaysia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 623-636, June.
    6. Kojima, Kiyoshi, 2000. "The "flying geese" model of Asian economic development: origin, theoretical extensions, and regional policy implications," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 375-401.
    7. Kajisa, Kei & Maredia, Mywish K. & Boughton, Duncan, 1997. "Transformation Versus Stagnation In The Oil Palm Industry: A Comparison Between Malaysia And Nigeria," Staff Paper Series 11483, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhihua Xu & Anthony Yeh, 2013. "Origin Effects, Spatial Dynamics and Redistribution of FDI In Guangdong, China," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 104(4), pages 439-455, September.
    2. Ozawa, Terutomo, 2003. "Pax Americana-led macro-clustering and flying-geese-style catch-up in East Asia: mechanisms of regionalized endogenous growth," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 699-713, January.
    3. Shigehisa Kasahara, 2004. "The Flying Geese Paradigm: A Critical Study Of Its Application To East Asian Regional Development," UNCTAD Discussion Papers 169, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    4. Ju, Jiandong & Lin, Justin Yifu & Wang, Yong, 2015. "Endowment structures, industrial dynamics, and economic growth," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 244-263.
    5. Tri WIDODO, 2009. "Comparative Advantage: Theory, Empirical Measures And Case Studies," Review of Economic and Business Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 4, pages 57-82, November.
    6. Jianqing, Ruan & Zhang, Xiaobo, 2010. "Do geese migrate domestically?: Evidence from the Chinese textile and apparel industry," IFPRI discussion papers 1040, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    7. Lizhi Gui & Xiaowen Hu & Xiaorui Li & Ming Zheng, 2022. "Study on the Influence of Undertaking Industrial Transfer on the Sustainability Development of Wanjiang City Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-17, November.
    8. Varkkey, Helena & Tyson, Adam & Choiruzzad, Shofwan Al Banna, 2018. "Palm oil intensification and expansion in Indonesia and Malaysia: Environmental and socio-political factors influencing policy," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 148-159.
    9. Kalotay, Kalman, 2004. "The European flying geese: New FDI patterns for the old continent?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 27-49, April.
    10. Won Kim, 2012. "The rise of Coastal China and inter-regional relations among core economic regions of East Asia," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 48(1), pages 283-299, February.
    11. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2021. "Analysis of Changes in Comparative Advantages of the Manufacturing in Vietnam and Comparison with China," OSF Preprints e9avy, Center for Open Science.
    12. Kozo Kiyota, 2014. "Industrial Upgrading in a Multiple-cone Heckscher–Ohlin Model: The Flying Geese Patterns of Industrial Development," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 177-193, February.
    13. Peter John Marcotullio, 2003. "Globalisation, Urban Form and Environmental Conditions in Asia-Pacific Cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(2), pages 219-247, February.
    14. Harvey Cutler & Terutomo Ozawa, 2007. "The Dynamics Of The “Mature” Product Cycle And Market Reycling, Flying‐Geese Style: An Empirical Examination And Policy Implications," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 25(1), pages 67-78, January.
    15. Song Zhang & Chunlai Chen, 2020. "Does Outward Foreign Direct Investment Facilitate China's Export Upgrading?," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 28(5), pages 64-89, September.
    16. Lurong Chen & Philippe De Lombaerde, 2013. "China moving up the value chain: What can be learned from the Asian NICs?," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 16(4), pages 407-430, December.
    17. Widodo, Tri, 2007. "“Flying Geese” Paradigm: Review, Analytical Tool and Application," MPRA Paper 78218, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Kalotay, Kalman, 2008. "Russian transnationals and international investment paradigms," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 85-107, June.
    19. Chen, Hung-Ju, 2019. "Innovation and FDI: Does the Target of Intellectual Property Rights Matter?," MPRA Paper 94692, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Iamsiraroj, Sasi, 2016. "The foreign direct investment–economic growth nexus," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 116-133.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • N00 - Economic History - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehs:wpaper:16013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chair Public Engagement Committe (currently David Higgins - Newcastle) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ehsukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.