[go: up one dir, main page]

IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ctw/wpaper/202107.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

COVID-19 and the labour market: Estimating the employment effects of South Africa’s national lockdown

Author

Listed:
  • Tim Köhler
  • Haroon Bhorat
  • Robert Hill
  • Ben Stanwix

    (Development Policy Research Unit, University of Cape Town)

Abstract
Like most around the world, the South African government quickly implemented a relatively stringent national lockdown in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Although much research documenting the pandemic’s economic effects exists, these studies are largely descriptive in nature and are therefore unable to distinguish changes in employment attributable to lockdown policy versus other pandemic related factors such as foreign policy and consumption-related behavioural responses. In this paper, we seek to specifically isolate and provide causal evidence on the effect of South Africa’s lockdown policy in particular. To do so, we adopt a quasi-experimental econometric technique to exploit variation in legislated industry-level permission to work and the coincidental timing of the lockdown and data collection dates of nationally representative labour force data. We find that the national lockdown decreased the probability of employment for those not permitted to work by 8 percentage points relative to the control group. This significant, negative effect holds across several robustness tests. Using this estimate we can approximate that, of the 2.2 million fewer people employed, South Africa’s lockdown policy directly accounted for just under 600 000 (or 26% of total jobs lost), suggesting the majority of job loss can be attributed to other pandemic-related factors. We further show that the lockdown particularly jeopardized the livelihoods of those in the informal sector, with an estimated effect nearly 3 times larger than the overall effect. The vulnerability of this group to the economic consequences of the pandemic is of concern, given that their informality presents a challenge for government to provide targeted relief. To prevent further widening labour market inequalities, our analysis emphasises the importance of effective policy to support the livelihoods of those in the informal economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Tim Köhler & Haroon Bhorat & Robert Hill & Ben Stanwix, 2021. "COVID-19 and the labour market: Estimating the employment effects of South Africa’s national lockdown," Working Papers 202107, University of Cape Town, Development Policy Research Unit.
  • Handle: RePEc:ctw:wpaper:202107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://commerce.uct.ac.za/sites/default/files/content_migration/commerce_uct_ac_za/1093/files/DPRU%2520WP202107.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2021
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    South Africa; labour market; COVID-19; pandemic; employment; causal inference; quasi-experimental; inequality;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D04 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Microeconomic Policy: Formulation; Implementation; Evaluation
    • J08 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - Labor Economics Policies
    • J20 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - General
    • J48 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Particular Labor Markets - - - Particular Labor Markets; Public Policy
    • J88 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Standards - - - Public Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ctw:wpaper:202107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Waseema Petersen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dpuctza.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.