[go: up one dir, main page]

IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/csa/wpaper/2017-15-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Cash-Plus: Poverty Impacts of Transfer-Based Intervention Alternatives

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Sedlmayr
  • Anuj Shah
  • Munshi Sulaiman
Abstract
Can programmatic extensions such as training and mentorship enhance the economic impact of cash transfers, or do they needlessly absorb resources that program recipients could allocate more meaningfully by themselves? Using a randomized trial, we evaluate a program that targets poor Ugandans and offers them an integrated package comprised of lump sum transfers, coaching, and training on microenterprise development as well as savings group formation. We assess its impact and that of its savings component, as well as the impacts of much simplified program variants: one intervention variant that is limited to lump sum cash transfers and another that expands upon transfers using a light-touch behavioral intervention component. The results support the notion that integrated development interventions are sensible poverty reduction tools.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Sedlmayr & Anuj Shah & Munshi Sulaiman, 2017. "Cash-Plus: Poverty Impacts of Transfer-Based Intervention Alternatives," CSAE Working Paper Series 2017-15-2, Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford.
  • Handle: RePEc:csa:wpaper:2017-15-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.csae.ox.ac.uk/materials/papers/csae-wps-2017-15-2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sedlmayr, Richard, 2018. "Rewarding Poverty Alleviation: A Case Study in Payment-by-Results," SocArXiv hdr78, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    graduation; microenterprise; cash transfers; behavioral design;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O12 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
    • O22 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Project Analysis
    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation
    • I38 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:csa:wpaper:2017-15-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Julia Coffey (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csaoxuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.