[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cfi/jseres/cj017.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Bankruptcy Analysis and Going-concern Opinion Is Cox Proportional Hazard Model applicable to the auditing practice?

Author

Listed:
  • Takashi Obinata

    (Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo)

Abstract
This paper reviews the literature on bankruptcy analysis, focusing on the association (the logical linkage) between hazard model and going-concern opinion. Hazard model is a technique that can test the relative impact on the bankruptcy risk of a particular factor, but not a technique that estimates the probabilities of the bankruptcy. Therefore, it is doubtful whether the estimation results by the hazard model can be directly applicable to the going-concern audit. Prior studies repeated the data mining in the absence of theoretical background and rational hypotheses, so the important issues are open to further research, i.e. selection of independent and dependent variables, model selection. Before we apply hazard model to the auditing practice, some hard problems should be resolved. For example, the evaluation method of estimated results and the effects on the firm's behavior by modified opinion are not clarified yet. Though many studies report that the information value of going-concern opinion is suspicious, their research design includes problems in many cases. For the present, no definitive conclusion on the information value exists. From the beginning, it is doubtful whether empirical research using public data can unveil the private decision-making process of auditors, who can know the internal (private) information of the firm.

Suggested Citation

  • Takashi Obinata, 2005. "Bankruptcy Analysis and Going-concern Opinion Is Cox Proportional Hazard Model applicable to the auditing practice?," CARF J-Series CARF-J-017, Center for Advanced Research in Finance, Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo.
    • Handle: RePEc:cfi:jseres:cj017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.carf.e.u-tokyo.ac.jp/pdf/workingpaper/jseries/17.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cfi:jseres:cj017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/catokjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.