[go: up one dir, main page]

IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bre/polcon/35218.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A European carbon border tax- much pain, little gain

Author

Listed:
  • Ben McWilliams
  • Georg Zachmann
Abstract
The European Green Deal has set a target of reducing European Union carbon emissions by about 40 per cent over the next ten years. Reaching this target is likely to involve a significant increase in carbon prices. Theoretically, higher carbon prices can lead to carbon leakage, or the relocation of industrial activity and its accompanying emissions out of economies with high carbon prices and into economies with low carbon prices....

Suggested Citation

  • Ben McWilliams & Georg Zachmann, 2020. "A European carbon border tax- much pain, little gain," Policy Contributions 35218, Bruegel.
  • Handle: RePEc:bre:polcon:35218
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bruegel.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/PC-05-2020-050320v2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Niko Korpar & Mario Larch & Roman Stöllinger, 2022. "Comparing Scenarios for a European Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: Trade, FDI and Welfare Effects with a Focus on the Austrian Economy," wiiw Research Reports 460, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    2. Robert J. R. Elliott & Ingmar Schumacher & Cees Withagen, 2020. "Suggestions for a Covid-19 Post-Pandemic Research Agenda in Environmental Economics," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 76(4), pages 1187-1213, August.
    3. George Mörsdorf, 2021. "A Simple Fix for Carbon Leakage? Assessing the Environmental Effectiveness of the EU Carbon Border Adjustment," ifo Working Paper Series 350, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    4. Sergei S. Sudakov & Samvel S. Lazaryan & Anton I. Votinov, 2022. "EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: Assessment of Future Payments for Exporters," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 5, pages 71-88, October.
    5. repec:wsr:ecbook:2021:i:vii-007 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Garnadt, Niklas & Grimm, Veronika & Reuter, Wolf Heinrich, 2020. "Carbon adjustment mechanisms: Empirics, design and caveats," Working Papers 11/2020, German Council of Economic Experts / Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung.
    7. Strand,Jon, 2021. "Incentivizing Carbon Taxation in Low-Income Countries : Tax Rebating versus Carbon Crediting," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9698, The World Bank.
    8. Pavel Tcvetkov, 2021. "Climate Policy Imbalance in the Energy Sector: Time to Focus on the Value of CO 2 Utilization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-22, January.
    9. McAusland, Carol, 2021. "Carbon taxes and footprint leakage: Spoilsport effects," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    10. Elkhan Richard Sadik-Zada & Mattia Ferrari, 2020. "Environmental Policy Stringency, Technical Progress and Pollution Haven Hypothesis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, May.
    11. Mörsdorf, George, 2022. "A simple fix for carbon leakage? Assessing the environmental effectiveness of the EU carbon border adjustment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    12. Panagiotis Fragkos & Kostas Fragkiadakis & Leonidas Paroussos, 2021. "Reducing the Decarbonisation Cost Burden for EU Energy-Intensive Industries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-23, January.
    13. Deng, Yirui & Yin, Mengjuan & Xu, Xiaofeng & Yu, Lean & Gao, Guowei & Ma, Li, 2024. "How to develop global energy-intensive sectors in the presence of carbon tariffs?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    14. Michael A. Mehling, 2023. "Supply-side offset crediting to manage climate policy spillover effects," Working Papers EPRG2313, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    15. Hafele, Jakob & Kuhls, Sonia, 2022. "Trade-off or tension: Can carbon be priced without risking economic competitiveness?," ZOE Discussion Papers 9, ZOE. institute for future-fit economies, Bonn.
    16. Robert B. Koopman & Mary Lisa Madell, 2023. "A fairer and more resilient multilateral trading system will require a reinvigorated WTO," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(S2), pages 35-39, March.
    17. Mehling, M. A., 2023. "Supply-Side Crediting to Manage Climate Policy Spillover Effects," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2345, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    18. Elkerbout, Milan & Bryhn, Julie & Righetti, Edoardo & Chapman, Francesca, 2022. "From carbon pricing to climate clubs: How to support global climate policy coordination towards climate neutrality," CEPS Papers 35998, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    19. Claudia Kettner & Gerald Feichtinger, 2021. "Fit for 55? Das neue Klima- und Energiepaket der EU," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 94(9), pages 665-677, September.
    20. Ernst, Anne & Hinterlang, Natascha & Mahle, Alexander & Stähler, Nikolai, 2022. "Carbon pricing, border adjustment and climate clubs: An assessment with EMuSe," Discussion Papers 25/2022, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    21. Abdelhak Bassou & Rim Berahab & Nouzha Chekrouni & Hinh T. Dinh & Karim El Aynaoui & Aomar Ibourk & Len Ishmael & Larabi Jaïdi & Mohammed Loulichki & Rida Lyammouri & Henri-Louis Vedie & Afaf Zarkik, 2022. "Le Sommet UE-UA 2022 : pour une interdépendance équilibrée," Books & Reports, Policy Center for the New South, number 42.
    22. Steinhauser Dušan & Kittová Zuzana & Khúlová Lucia, 2024. "Relationship Between CO2 Emissions and Trade: The Case of the EU," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Sciendo, vol. 59(1), pages 41-47, February.
    23. Wifo, 2021. "WIFO-Monatsberichte, Heft 9/2021," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 94(9), September.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bre:polcon:35218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bruegel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bruegbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.