[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uiucrr/14781.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Surveying Farmers: A Research Note

Author

Listed:
  • Pennings, Joost M.E.
  • Irwin, Scott H.
  • Good, Darrel L.
Abstract
Mail surveys are a very popular instrument for researchers as well as government agencies and commercial firms to obtain information about farmers. A large percentage of farmers do not respond to these mail surveys. To gain insight into why farmers do not respond and their preferences regarding mail surveys, farmers who did not respond to a mail survey were interviewed. From our field study it appears that a large proportion does not even read the questionnaire. Furthermore, the period in which the survey is sent along with the form and amount of compensation, the sender of the questionnaire, and the length of the questionnaire has a crucial impact on the willingness to participate.

Suggested Citation

  • Pennings, Joost M.E. & Irwin, Scott H. & Good, Darrel L., 1999. "Surveying Farmers: A Research Note," AgMAS Project Research Reports 14781, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uiucrr:14781
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.14781
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/14781/files/agm9904.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.14781?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marvin L. Hayenga, 1998. "Cost Structures of Pork Slaughter and Processing Firms: Behavioral and Performance Implications," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 20(2), pages 574-583.
    2. Ralph M. Brooks & Vernon D. Ryan & Brian F. Blake & John R. Gordon, 1975. "Increasing Response Rates in Mailed Questionnaires: Comment," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 57(3), pages 517-519.
    3. R. C. Buse, 1973. "Increasing Response Rates in Mailed Questionnaires," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 55(3), pages 503-508.
    4. Rueben C. Buse, 1975. "Increasing Response Rates in Mailed Questionnaires: Reply," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 57(3), pages 520-521.
    5. Dawn D. Thilmany, 1996. "FLC Usage Among California Growers under IRCA: An Empirical Analysis of Farm Labor Market Risk Management," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 78(4), pages 946-960.
    6. Jill E. Hobbs, 1997. "Measuring the Importance of Transaction Costs in Cattle Marketing," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 79(4), pages 1083-1095.
    7. Hayenga, Marvin L., 1998. "Cost Structures of Pork Slaughter and Processing Firms: Behavioral and Performance Implications," Staff General Research Papers Archive 1254, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Heberling, Matthew & Shortle, James S. & Fisher, Ann, 2000. "The Effect Of The Number Of Choice Sets On Responses In A Stated Choice Survey," 2000 Annual meeting, July 30-August 2, Tampa, FL 21832, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Smith, Richard W. & Conrad, Jon M. & Storey, David A., 1978. "A Mail/Telephone Technique For Collecting Primary Data," Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 7(1), pages 1-3, April.
    2. Joost M.E. Pennings & Scott H. Irwin & Darrel L. Good, 2002. "Surveying Farmers: A Case Study," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 24(1), pages 266-277.
    3. Poray, Michael C. & Gray, Allan W. & Boehlje, Michael & Preckel, Paul V., 2003. "Evaluation of Alternative Coordination Systems Between Producers and Packers in the Pork Value Chain," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 6(2), pages 1-21.
    4. Smith, Richard W. & Conrad, Jon M. & Storey, David A., 1978. "A Mail/Telephone Technique For Collecting Primary Data," Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 0(Number 1), pages 1-3, April.
    5. Siebert, John W. & Nayga, Rodolfo M., Jr. & Thelen, Gina C. & Kuker, Don, 2000. "Enhancing The Financial Performance Of Small Meat Processors," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 3(3), pages 1-12.
    6. Raper, Kellie Curry & Cheney, Laura Martin & Punjabi, Meeta, 2000. "Assessing The Impact Of A Hog Slaughter Plant Closing: The Thorn Apple Valley Case," Staff Paper Series 11658, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    7. Preckel, Paul V. & Boehlje, Michael & Gray, Allan W. & Kim, Sounghun, 2004. "Vertically Aligned Vs. Open Market Coordination: Dominance Or Co-Existence?," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20099, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    8. James M. MacDonald & Michael E. Ollinger, 2000. "Scale Economies and Consolidation in Hog Slaughter," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 82(2), pages 334-346.
    9. Philip L. Paarlberg & Mildred M. Haley, 2001. "Market concentration and vertical coordination in the pork industry: Implications for public policy analysis," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(2), pages 197-212.
    10. Kellie Curry Raper & Laura M. Cheney & Meeta Punjabi, 2006. "Regional Impacts of a U.S. Hog Slaughter Plant Closing: The Thorn Apple Valley Case," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 28(4), pages 531-542.
    11. Adhikari, Bishwa B. & Harsh, Stephen B. & Cheney, Laura Martin, 2003. "Factors Affecting Regional Shifts Of U.S Pork Production," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 22200, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    12. Poray, Michael C. & Gray, Allan W. & Boehlje, Michael, 2002. "Evaluation of Alternative Coordination Systems Between Producers and Packers in the Pork Value Chain," Staff Papers 200386, Purdue University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    13. Nganje, William E. & Mazzocco, Michael A. & McKeith, Floyd K., 1999. "Food Safety Regulation, Product Pricing, And Profitability: The Case Of Haccp," AE Series 23077, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    14. MacDonald, James M. & Ollinger, Michael & Nelson, Kenneth E. & Handy, Charles R., 2000. "Consolidation In U.S. Meatpacking," Agricultural Economic Reports 34021, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    15. Adhikari, Bishwa B. & Harsh, Stephen B. & Schwab, Gerald, 2004. "Regional Competitive Position Of Pork Industry," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20057, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    16. Brian L. Buhr, 2004. "Case Studies of Direct Marketing Value-Added Pork Products in a Commodity Market," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 26(2), pages 266-279.
    17. Ben-Belhassen, Boubaker & Womack, Abner W., 2000. "Measurement And Explanation Of Technical Efficiency In Missouri Hog Production," 2000 Annual meeting, July 30-August 2, Tampa, FL 21819, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    18. Stefano Ciliberti & Simone Del Sarto & Angelo Frascarelli & Giulia Pastorelli & Gaetano Martino, 2020. "Contracts to Govern the Transition towards Sustainable Production: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Analysis in the Durum Wheat Sector in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-14, November.
    19. Andrew Dorward, 2001. "The Effects of Transaction Costs, Power and Risk on Contractual Arrangements: A Conceptual Framework for Quantitative Analysis," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 59-73, May.
    20. Niquidet, Kurt & O'Kelly, Glen, 2010. "Forest-mill integration: A transaction cost perspective," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 207-212, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Research Methods/ Statistical Methods;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uiucrr:14781. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dauiuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.