[go: up one dir, main page]

IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/332919.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Modeling Trade in Services: Multiple Modes, Barriers to Trade, and Data Limitations

Author

Listed:
  • Barbe, Andre
  • Chambers, Art
  • Khachaturian, Tamar
  • Riker, David
Abstract
In 2015, international trade in services reached 13 percent of world GDP, according to the World Bank. Nonetheless, this trade is impeded by policy barriers that restrict foreign entry, the movement of people, competition, or regulatory transparency. It is challenging to quantify the impact of these barriers to international trade in services. There is very limited information on the value of these trade flows or the size of the barriers that impede them. In addition, the international provision of services occurs through multiple and inter-connected modes of delivery which can be complementary or competing. Finally, barriers to trade in services are complex and difficult to measure and compare across countries. Our research captures some of these complexities of international trade in services and overcomes some of the data challenges. We develop a model of trade in services that includes firm heterogeneity and multiple modes of delivery, including cross-border trade and foreign affiliate transactions. We then use the model to estimate how trade flows and prices would change if the European Union reduced barriers to non-EU providers of services by 50 percent. We find that this liberalization would increase the value of cross-border imports into the EU countries and foreign affiliate purchases in the EU countries by about 25 percent. However, it would only decrease the sales of domestic producers by 0.4 to 6.1 percent, and reduce overall prices of the services in the EU countries by 0.1 to 1.2 percent.

Suggested Citation

  • Barbe, Andre & Chambers, Art & Khachaturian, Tamar & Riker, David, 2017. "Modeling Trade in Services: Multiple Modes, Barriers to Trade, and Data Limitations," Conference papers 332919, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332919
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/332919/files/8705.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hildegunn Kyvik Nordås & Iza Lejárraga & Sébastien Miroudot & Frédéric Gonzales & Massimo Geloso Grosso & Dorothée Rouzet & Asako Ueno, 2014. "Services Trade Restrictiveness Index (STRI): Audio-visual Services," OECD Trade Policy Papers 174, OECD Publishing.
    2. di Giovanni, Julian & Levchenko, Andrei A. & Rancière, Romain, 2011. "Power laws in firm size and openness to trade: Measurement and implications," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(1), pages 42-52, September.
    3. Massimo Geloso Grosso & Hildegunn Kyvik Nordås & Frédéric Gonzales & Iza Lejárraga & Sébastien Miroudot & Asako Ueno & Dorothée Rouzet, 2014. "Services Trade Restrictiveness Index (STRI): Legal and Accounting Services," OECD Trade Policy Papers 171, OECD Publishing.
    4. Zhai, Fan, 2008. "Armington Meets Melitz: Introducing Firm Heterogeneity in a Global CGE Model of Trade," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 23, pages 575-604.
    5. Massimo Geloso Grosso & Hildegunn Kyvik Nordås & Asako Ueno & Frédéric Gonzales & Iza Lejárraga & Sébastien Miroudot & Dorothée Rouzet, 2014. "Services Trade Restrictiveness Index (STRI): Transport and Courier Services," OECD Trade Policy Papers 176, OECD Publishing.
    6. Massimo Geloso Grosso & Iza Lejárraga & Hildegunn Kyvik Nordås & Frédéric Gonzales & Sébastien Miroudot & Asako Ueno & Dorothée Rouzet, 2014. "Services Trade Restrictiveness Index (STRI): Construction, Architecture and Engineering Services," OECD Trade Policy Papers 170, OECD Publishing.
    7. Hildegunn Kyvik Nordås & Massimo Geloso Grosso & Frédéric Gonzales & Iza Lejárraga & Sébastien Miroudot & Asako Ueno & Dorothée Rouzet, 2014. "Services Trade Restrictiveness Index (STRI): Computer and Related Services," OECD Trade Policy Papers 169, OECD Publishing.
    8. Hildegunn Kyvik Nordås & Massimo Geloso Grosso & Frédéric Gonzales & Iza Lejárraga & Molly Lesher & Sébastien Miroudot & Asako Ueno & Dorothée Rouzet, 2014. "Services Trade Restrictiveness Index (STRI): Telecommunication Services," OECD Trade Policy Papers 172, OECD Publishing.
    9. Asako Ueno & Massimo Geloso Grosso & Iza Lejárraga & Hildegunn Kyvik Nordås & Sébastien Miroudot & Frédéric Gonzales & Dorothée Rouzet, 2014. "Services Trade Restrictiveness Index (STRI): Distribution Services," OECD Trade Policy Papers 173, OECD Publishing.
    10. Dorothée Rouzet & Hildegunn Kyvik Nordås & Frédéric Gonzales & Massimo Geloso Grosso & Iza Lejárraga & Sébastien Miroudot & Asako Ueno, 2014. "Services Trade Restrictiveness Index (STRI): Financial Services," OECD Trade Policy Papers 175, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Masood, Maria, 2019. "New evidence on income and the geographical distribution of imports: The case of audiovisuals," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 717-734.
    2. Zongo, Amara, 2020. "The Impact of Services Trade Restrictiveness on Food Trade," MPRA Paper 101658, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Amara Zongo, 2021. "The impact of services trade restrictiveness on food trade," International Economics, CEPII research center, issue 166, pages 71-94.
    4. Reto Föllmi & Angela Fuest & Philipp an de Meulen & Martin Micheli & Torsten Schmidt & Lina Zwick, 2018. "Openness and productivity of the Swiss economy," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, Springer;Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics, vol. 154(1), pages 1-21, December.
    5. Ahmad, Saad & Akgul, Zeynep, 2018. "Using Power Laws to Identify the Structural Parameters of Trade Models with Firm Heterogeneity," Conference papers 332993, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    6. Nilsson, Lars, 2019. "Reflections on the economic modelling of free trade agreements," DG TRADE Chief Economist Notes 2019-2, Directorate General for Trade, European Commission.
    7. Eddy Bekkers & Joseph Francois, 2018. "A Parsimonious Approach to Incorporate Firm Heterogeneity in CGE-Models," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 3(2), pages 1-68, December.
    8. Akgul, Zeynep & Villoria, Nelson & Hertel, Thomas, 2015. "Theoretically-Consistent Parameterization of a Multi-sector Global Model with Heterogeneous Firms," Conference papers 332604, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    9. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/21q7rlmakq8ca9c6o2imhini9d is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Petra Štamfestová & Lukáš Sobíšek & Jiří Hnilica, 2023. "Firm Size Distribution in the Central European Context," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2023(5), pages 151-175.
    11. Yuko Imura, 2023. "Reassessing Trade Barriers with Global Production Networks," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 51, pages 77-116, December.
    12. François Gourio & Nicolas Roys, 2014. "Size‐dependent regulations, firm size distribution, and reallocation," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 5, pages 377-416, July.
    13. Heinrich, Torsten & Yang, Jangho & Dai, Shuanping, 2020. "Growth, development, and structural change at the firm-level: The example of the PR China," MPRA Paper 105011, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Pupato, Germán, 2017. "Performance pay, trade and inequality," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 478-504.
    15. Mukherjee, Rahul & Proebsting, Christian, 2021. "Acquirers and financial constraints: Theory and evidence from emerging markets," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    16. Olga A. Timoshenko & Erick Sager, 2017. "Uncertainty and Trade Elasticities," Working Papers 2017-8, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
    17. Ruben Dewitte & Michel Dumont & Glenn Rayp & Peter Willemé, 2022. "Unobserved heterogeneity in the productivity distribution and gains from trade," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(3), pages 1566-1597, August.
    18. Fan Zhai, 2010. "The Benefits of Regional Infrastructure Investment in Asia : A Quantitative Exploration," Microeconomics Working Papers 22803, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    19. Fugazza, Marco & Maur, Jean-Christophe, 2008. "Non-tariff barriers in CGE models: How useful for policy?," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 475-490.
    20. Cerqueti, Roy & Lupi, Claudio & Pietrovito, Filomena & Pozzolo, Alberto Franco, 2022. "Rank–size distributions for banks: A cross-country analysis," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 585(C).
    21. Alessandra Bonfiglioli & Rosario Crinò & Gino Gancia, 2021. "International Trade with Heterogeneous Firms: Theory and Evidence," CESifo Working Paper Series 9423, CESifo.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    International Relations/Trade;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332919. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.