[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/331417.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Minimizing Carbon Leakage under Open Trade: Strategies for the Allocation of Pollution Permits

Author

Listed:
  • Fischer, Carolyn
  • Fox, Alan K.
Abstract
Building on the general equilibrium analysis conducted by the authors in "Output-Based Allocations of Emissions Permits: Efficiency and Distributional Effects in a General Equilibrium Setting with Taxes and Trade," this paper sets out to expand on one of the central findings of the first paper. For a cap-and-trade scheme, in the absence of other market failures, lump-sum distributions of emissions permits, like auctions or grandfathering, are equally efficient. Meanwhile, output-based allocation (OBA) is an inefficient mechanism, due to the implicit output subsidy granted, which discourages conservation as a means of emissions reduction. However, in a second-best world with tax and trade distortions, OBA does have features that make it appealing from an economic efficiency standpoint. First, it mitigates the price rises that tend to exacerbate pre-existing tax distortions to the labor market. Second, OBA potentially results in much lower rates of carbon leakage from the implementing country to the rest of world. It may also prevent leakage toward unregulated sectors within the subject economy. Finally, from a political standpoint, it may help minimize the political difficulties of achieving emissions reductions goals, given competitiveness concerns. Still, tradeoffs exist between achieving these different goals. This paper will analyze these potential tradeoffs of choosing different allocation mechanisms in order to achieve overall emissions reductions goals while minimizing intra- and international leakage and minimizing the traditional measures of welfare loss associated with emissions reductions. The goal of the paper is to propose certain rules for identifying sectors and mechanisms for minimizing the costs of broader emissions reduction when considering the interaction of one country's emissions policies with unregulated emissions and labor market distortions. The analysis is carried out in a modified GTAP framework augmented with a labor-leisure choice for workers and documented in the previous paper. Such a framework allows for the consideration of how distortionary tax instruments may be offset by revenues generated from permit auctions or may be exacerbated by policies that raise prices. The current implementation relies on the GTAP version 5 database, although efforts are underway to update to the GTAP version 6 database. While this update is useful from a policy perspective, it is not necessary to the central purpose of this paper, that is, to analyze the relative effectiveness of different emissions policies in a world with pre-existing tax distortions.

Suggested Citation

  • Fischer, Carolyn & Fox, Alan K., 2005. "Minimizing Carbon Leakage under Open Trade: Strategies for the Allocation of Pollution Permits," Conference papers 331417, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331417
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/331417/files/2175.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brown, J. David & Earle, John S., 2002. "Gross Job Flows in Russian Industry Before and After Reforms: Has Destruction Become More Creative?," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 96-133, March.
    2. Ms. Benedicte Vibe Christensen, 1994. "The Russian Federation in Transition: External Developments," IMF Occasional Papers 1994/005, International Monetary Fund.
    3. Pinelopi K. Goldberg & Nina Pavcnik, 2001. "Trade Protection and Wages: Evidence from the Colombian Trade Reforms," NBER Working Papers 8575, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Cragg, Michael Ian & Epelbaum, Mario, 1996. "Why has wage dispersion grown in Mexico? Is it the incidence of reforms or the growing demand for skills?," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 99-116, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Akhmed Akhmedov & Evgenia Bessonova & Ivan Cherkashin & Irina Denisova & Elena Grishina, 2005. "Adjustment Costs of Trade Liberalization: Estimations for the Russian Labor Market," Working Papers w0086, Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR).
    2. Akhmed Akhmedov & Evgenia Bessonova & Ivan Cherkashin & Irina Denisova & Elena Grishina, 2005. "Adjustment Costs of Trade Liberalization: Estimations for the Russian Labor Market," Working Papers w0086, Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR).
    3. Akhmed Akhmedov & Evgenia Bessonova & Ivan Cherkashin & Irina Denisova & Elena Grishina & Denis Nekipelov, 2003. "WTO Accession and the Labor Market: Estimations for Russia," Working Papers w0040, New Economic School (NES).
    4. Phillippe Leite & Matthew Wai-Poi & Francisco H.G. Ferreira, 2007. "Trade Liberalization, Employment Flows and Wage Inequality in Brazil," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2007-58, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    5. Petia Topalova, 2007. "Trade Liberalization, Poverty and Inequality: Evidence from Indian Districts," NBER Chapters, in: Globalization and Poverty, pages 291-336, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Goldberg, Pinelopi Koujianou & Pavcnik, Nina, 2005. "Trade, wages, and the political economy of trade protection: evidence from the Colombian trade reforms," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 75-105, May.
    7. Noria, Gabriela López, 2015. "The effect of trade and FDI on inter-industry wage differentials: The case of Mexico," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 381-397.
    8. Meschi, Elena & Vivarelli, Marco, 2007. "Globalization and Income Inequality," IZA Discussion Papers 2958, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. Evguenia Bessonova & Konstantin Kozlov & Ksenia Yudaeva, 2003. "Trade Liberalization, Foreign Direct Investment, and Productivity of Russian Firms," DEGIT Conference Papers c008_009, DEGIT, Dynamics, Economic Growth, and International Trade.
    10. Meschi, Elena & Vivarelli, Marco, 2009. "Trade and Income Inequality in Developing Countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 287-302, February.
    11. repec:ilo:ilowps:365055 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Pinelopi K. Goldberg & Nina Pavcnik, 2004. "Trade, Inequality, and Poverty: What Do We Know? Evidence from Recent Trade Liberalization Episodes in Developing Countries," NBER Working Papers 10593, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Robbins, Donald J., 2003. "The impact of trade liberalization upon inequality in developing countries : a review of theory and evidence," ILO Working Papers 993650553402676, International Labour Organization.
    14. Gordon H. Hanson, 2003. "What Has Happened to Wages in Mexico since NAFTA?," NBER Working Papers 9563, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Maleva, Tatiana (Малева, Татьяна) & Zubarevich, Natalya (Зубаревич, Наталья) & Lyashok, Victor (Ляшок, Виктор) & Lopatina, Marina (Лопатина, Марина), 2018. "The Russian Labor Market: The Impact of Crises [Российский Рынок Труда: Воздействие Кризисов]," Working Papers 041831, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    16. Pinelopi Koujianou Goldberg & Nina Pavcnik, 2007. "The Effects of the Colombian Trade Liberalization on Urban Poverty," NBER Chapters, in: Globalization and Poverty, pages 241-290, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. J. David Brown & John S. Earle, 2003. "The reallocation of workers and jobs in Russian industry," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 11(2), pages 221-252, June.
    18. Giulia Faggio, 2007. "Job Destruction, Job Creation and Unemployment in Transition Countries: What Can We Learn?," CEP Discussion Papers dp0798, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    19. Chiquiar, Daniel & Covarrubias, Enrique & Salcedo, Alejandrina, 2016. "Labor market consequences of trade openness and competition in foreign markets," Conference papers 332760, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    20. Eric A. Verhoogen, 2008. "Trade, Quality Upgrading, and Wage Inequality in the Mexican Manufacturing Sector," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 123(2), pages 489-530.
    21. Gurleen K. Popli, 2007. "Rising Wage Inequality in Mexico, 1984-2000: A Distributional Analysis," Journal of Income Distribution, Ad libros publications inc., vol. 16(2), pages 49-67, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331417. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.