[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea14/169291.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Water Demand Elasticities: Selection Effects in Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Hoehn, John
Abstract
A meta-analysis of reported water demand elasticities shows that publication selection bias results in water demand estimates that overstate price elasticities. The analysis uses panel data estimators to measure and adjust for publication bias. A random effects estimator is used to derive water demand elasticity estimates that are efficient and unbiased by selection effects. The sample mean elasticity for reported elasticities is -.37%. Once publication bias is removed, the mean elasticity estimate drops to -.08%. Indoor water demand is almost perfectly inelastic. Water demands and their elasticities are heterogeneous in specific uses and locations. Water demand elasticities vary by location, water use type, econometric approach and publication bias. Water use elasticities range up -1.48% for domestic irrigation demand in the southwestern US. Estimated elasticities are also higher when derived with discrete choice data and estimators.

Suggested Citation

  • Hoehn, John, 2014. "Water Demand Elasticities: Selection Effects in Meta-Analysis," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 169291, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea14:169291
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.169291
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/169291/files/hoehn%20AAEA%20poster%205%2021%2014.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.169291?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Demand and Price Analysis; Resource /Energy Economics and Policy;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea14:169291. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.