[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/fziddp/302011.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Measuring social capital and innovation in poor agricultural communities: The case of Cháparra, Peru

Author

Listed:
  • Hartmann, Dominik
  • Arata, Atilio
Abstract
In the last decades substantive advance has been made in the measurement and understanding of frontier innovation in highly industrialized settings. However, little research focused on the process of learning and the introduction of novelties in smallholder farming of poor agricultural communities. Considering that 1.5 billion people in developing countries live in such smallholder households this is an essential shortcoming. In addressing three crucial questions about the measurement and promotion of endogenous local development this paper contributes to close this research gap. The three questions are: a) how can we measure social capital and innovation in poor agricultural communities, b) what is the impact of external agents on local structures and c) what are the relations between the social capital and the innovative performance of the farmer. In a first step a comprehensive questionnaire with 89 questions on diverse dimensions of social capital and innovation has been elaborated and applied to the agricultural valley of Cháparra in the South of Peru. The results allow for an indepth analysis of the capabilities, network position and innovative behavior of the farmers. In a second step, we apply social network analysis techniques to analyze the role and position of the relevant actors in the local as well as in the external technical information networks with a special focus on the influence of an external NGO. The analysis reveals a deep structural impact of the NGO and significant correlations between the network position of the farmers and their innovative performance. Three crucial issues for research on smallholder innovation are identified. First, diverse dimensions of social capital and innovation have to be differentiated when studying endogenous development. Second, it has to be assessed to which degree the modification of the existing social structures by external agents can be harmful or beneficial. Third, social network analysis can help us to gain a better understanding of the complex relations between social capital and innovation and how these can contribute to foster sustainable development projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Hartmann, Dominik & Arata, Atilio, 2011. "Measuring social capital and innovation in poor agricultural communities: The case of Cháparra, Peru," FZID Discussion Papers 30-2011, University of Hohenheim, Center for Research on Innovation and Services (FZID).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:fziddp:302011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/49302/1/665321945.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ellen Fitzpatrick & Sedef Akg?ng?r, 2019. "Evaluating the Asset Transfer Model in Facilitating Sustainable Livelihoods in Rural Malawi," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 21(1), pages 129-152.
    2. D. Hartmann & A. Arata & M. Bezerra & F.L. Pinheiro, 2019. "The network effects of NGOs on social capital and innovation of smallholder farmers. A case study in Peru," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1905, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jan 2019.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    social capital; innovation; smallholders; Cháparra; Peru; network analysis;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:fziddp:302011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fihohde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.