[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/bofrdp/rdp1997_018.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A market based approach to maintaining systemic stability: experiences from New Zealand

Author

Listed:
  • Mayes, David G.
Abstract
Viimeisen vuosikymmenen pankkikriisit ovat herättäneet huolestumista monissa teollisuusmaissa.Tässä raportissa tarkastellaan Uudessa-Seelannissa vuonna 1996 käyttöön otetun, julkistamisperiaatteeseen nojautuvan pankkivalvontajärjestelmän etuja.Vaikka Uudella-Seelannilla on monia erityispiirteitä, jotka tekevät uudesta järjestelmästä juuri sille erityisen soveliaan, soveltuvat järjestelmän kaikki pääperiaatteet muuhunkin OECD-alueeseen, myös nykyisen EU-lainsäädännön yhteyteen.Nämä periaatteet ovat seuraavat: 1) yritysjohdon kontrollin laadun varmistaminen ja laadukkaat laskentatoimen ja riippumattoman tilintarkastuksen standardit rahoituslaitoksissa, jotka haluavat pankkitoimiluvan 2) markkinakurin edellyttämän konkreettisen informaation julkistaminen yksittäisten pankkien riskinotosta; informaatioon on sisällyttävä pankkien koko toimintaa koskevat value-at-risk -laskelmat 3) pankkien johdon ja hallinnon pitäminen vastuullisina pankkien liiketoiminnan asiaankuuluvasta varovaisuudesta; tähän kuuluvat rangaistukset ja taloudellinen vastuu virheellisistä tiedoista 4) veronmaksajien varojen vaarantamisen välttäminen antamalla ymmärtää, että mikään pankki ei ole liian iso kaatumaan, ja keskittämällä valvontaviranomaisten toimet sen varmistamiseen, että ne voivat puuttua asioihin ja estää koko rahoitusjärjestelmän kannalta haitalliset seuraukset yksittäisen pankin joutuessa vaikeuksiin. Näillä keinoin voidaan merkittävästi vähentää pankkivalvontaan liittyvää moraalikatoa ja valvonnan kustannuksia.

Suggested Citation

  • Mayes, David G., 1997. "A market based approach to maintaining systemic stability: experiences from New Zealand," Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers 18/1997, Bank of Finland.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:bofrdp:rdp1997_018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/211799/1/bof-rdp1997-018.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Douglas W. Diamond & Philip H. Dybvig, 2000. "Bank runs, deposit insurance, and liquidity," Quarterly Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, vol. 24(Win), pages 14-23.
    2. Douglas W. Diamond, 1984. "Financial Intermediation and Delegated Monitoring," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 51(3), pages 393-414.
    3. Diamond, Douglas W, 1991. "Monitoring and Reputation: The Choice between Bank Loans and Directly Placed Debt," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 99(4), pages 689-721, August.
    4. Paul H. Kupiec & James M. O'Brien, 1995. "Recent developments in bank capital regulation of market risks," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 95-51, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    5. repec:zbw:bofrdp:1997_005 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Dr Donald Brash, 1997. "Banking soundness and the role of the market," Reserve Bank of New Zealand Bulletin, Reserve Bank of New Zealand, vol. 60, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ari Hyytinen & Tuomas Takalo, 2002. "Enhancing Bank Transparency: A Re-assessment," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 6(3), pages 429-445.
    2. Llewellyn, David T. & Mayes, David G., 2003. "The role of market discipline in handling problem banks," Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers 21/2003, Bank of Finland.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mayes, David G., 1997. "A market based approach to maintaining systemic stability : experiences from New Zealand," Research Discussion Papers 18/1997, Bank of Finland.
    2. repec:zbw:bofrdp:1997_018 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Gary Gorton & Andrew Winton, "undated". "Bank Capital Regulation in General Equilibrium," Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research Working Papers 17-95, Wharton School Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research.
    4. Mark Egan & Stefan Lewellen & Adi Sunderam, 2017. "The Cross Section of Bank Value," NBER Working Papers 23291, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Paul Auerbach & Jalal Uddin Siddiki, 2004. "Financial Liberalisation and Economic Development: An Assessment," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(3), pages 231-265, July.
    6. Donker, Han & Ng, Alex & Shao, Pei, 2020. "Borrower distress and the efficiency of relationship banking," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    7. Sergey Chernenko & Isil Erel & Robert Prilmeier, 2019. "Why Do Firms Borrow Directly from Nonbanks?," NBER Working Papers 26458, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Bodil O. Hansen & Hans Keiding, 2004. "Financial Intermediation, Moral Hazard, And Pareto Inferior Trade," Economia, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics], vol. 5(2), pages 189-219.
    9. Niinimaki, J. -P., 2001. "Intertemporal diversification in financial intermediation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 965-991, May.
    10. Alessandro Giovannini & Maurizio Iacopetta & Raoul Minetti, 2013. "Financial Markets, Banks, and Growth : Disentangling the links," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 0(5), pages 105-147.
    11. Elijah Brewer & William E. Jackson, 2002. "Inter-industry contagion and the competitive effects of financial distress announcements: evidence from commercial banks and life insurance companies," Working Paper Series WP-02-23, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    12. Norden, L., 2015. "The Role of Banks in SME Finance," ERIM Inaugural Address Series Research in Management EIA-2015-062-F&A, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam..
    13. Committee, Nobel Prize, 2022. "Financial Intermediation and the Economy," Nobel Prize in Economics documents 2022-2, Nobel Prize Committee.
    14. Crouzille, Celine & Lepetit, Laetitia & Tarazi, Amine, 2004. "Bank stock volatility, news and asymmetric information in banking: an empirical investigation," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 14(4-5), pages 443-461.
    15. Hans Degryse & Steven Ongena, 2002. "Bank-Firm Relationships and International Banking Markets," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(3), pages 401-417.
    16. Hansen, Bodil Olai & Keiding, Hans, 2006. "Financial Intermediation, Moral Hazard, And Pareto Inferior Trade," Working Papers 07-2004, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Economics.
    17. Mark S. Carey & Stephen D. Prowse & John Rea & Gregory F. Udell, 1993. "The economics of the private placement market," Staff Studies 166, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    18. Morales, María F., 2003. "Financial Intermediation In A Model Of Growth Through Creative Destruction," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(3), pages 363-393, June.
    19. Stefan Lewellen & Adi Sunderam & Mark Egan, 2017. "The Cross Section of Bank Value," 2017 Meeting Papers 1283, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    20. Werner, Richard A., 2014. "Can banks individually create money out of nothing? — The theories and the empirical evidence," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 1-19.
    21. Werner, Richard A., 2016. "A lost century in economics: Three theories of banking and the conclusive evidence," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 361-379.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:bofrdp:rdp1997_018. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bofgvfi.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.