[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wes/weswpa/2024-003.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Was Freedom Road a Dead End? Political and socio-economic effects of Reconstruction in the American South

Author

Listed:
  • Jeffry Frieden

    (Harvard University)

  • Richard S.Grossman

    (Department of Economics, Wesleyan University)

  • Daniel Lowery

    (Harvard University)

Abstract
We investigate how Reconstruction affected Black political participation and socioeconomic advancement after the American Civil War. We use the location of federal troops and Freedmen’s Bureau offices to indicate more intensive federal enforcement of civil rights. We find greater political empowerment and socio-economic advances by Blacks where Reconstruction was more rigorously enforced and that those effects persisted at least until the early twentieth century, although these advances were weaker in cotton-plantation zones. We suggest a mechanism leading from greater Black political power to higher local property taxes, through to higher levels of Black schooling and greater Black socio-economic achievement.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffry Frieden & Richard S.Grossman & Daniel Lowery, 2024. "Was Freedom Road a Dead End? Political and socio-economic effects of Reconstruction in the American South," Wesleyan Economics Working Papers 2024-003, Wesleyan University, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:wes:weswpa:2024-003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.wesleyan.edu/pdf/rgrossman/2024003_grossman.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • N31 - Economic History - - Labor and Consumers, Demography, Education, Health, Welfare, Income, Wealth, Religion, and Philanthropy - - - U.S.; Canada: Pre-1913
    • P1 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies
    • O1 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development
    • O51 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - U.S.; Canada

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wes:weswpa:2024-003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Manolis Kaparakis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/edwesus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.