[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tth/wpaper/61.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Discovering Innovation Labs in the Public Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Piret Tõnurist
  • Rainer Kattel
  • Veiko Lember
Abstract
While innovation labs (i-labs) are increasingly popular in the public sector, there is almost no systematic academic overview of these organizations. This article is a first comprehensive attempt to map and analyze such labs globally. We have identified 35 such organizations all over the world. The research is based on a two-step approach: first, a comprehensive survey was carried out followed by an extensive in-depth interview with the managing figures of i-labs; 11 i-labs responded. The survey is based on longterm and large-scale research into public sector organizations in Europe (COBRA project); we have significantly updated it to fit our purposes. In this article we report our first findings. I-labs are rather unique organizations and diverse in their mission, expected to act as change agents within public sector and enjoy large autonomy in setting their targets and working methods. I-labs are typically structurally separated from the rest of the public sector and expected to be able to attract external funding as well as ‘sell’ their ideas and solutions within the public sector. I-labs tend be small structures, specializing on quick experimentations and usually lack the capabilities and authority to significantly influence up-scaling of the new solutions or processes. The main capabilities of i-labs are their ability to jump-start or show case user-driven service re-design projects. Interestingly, IT capabilities seem to be not that prominently present in the studied i-labs. In sum: i-labs, although prominent in many modern public management strategies, are yet far from becoming organic parts of public sector, which is paradoxically both their weakness and strength.

Suggested Citation

  • Piret Tõnurist & Rainer Kattel & Veiko Lember, 2015. "Discovering Innovation Labs in the Public Sector," The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 61, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.
    • Handle: RePEc:tth:wpaper:61
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hum.ttu.ee/wp/paper61.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erik S. Reinert & Kenneth Carpenter, 2014. "German Language Economic Bestsellers before 1850, with two chapters on a common reference point of Cameralism and Mercantilism," The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 58, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ryan Anders Whitney, 2022. "FROM HERE, THERE, AND EVERYWHERE: English‐language Media Outlets and Urban Planning Best Practices in the Global South," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 466-479, May.
    2. Emmanuel Coblence & Elsa Vivant, 2017. "Le design est-il soluble dans l'administration? Trois trajectoires d'institutionnalisation de l'innovation publique," Post-Print halshs-01563840, HAL.
    3. Karo , Erkki & Kattel , Rainer, 2015. "Innovation Bureaucracy: Does the organization of government matter when promoting innovation?," Papers in Innovation Studies 2015/38, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    4. Michael McGann & Emma Blomkamp & Jenny M. Lewis, 2018. "The rise of public sector innovation labs: experiments in design thinking for policy," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 51(3), pages 249-267, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrea Saltelli & Catalin Dragomirescu-Gaina, 2014. "New Narratives for the European Project," The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 59, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.
    2. Egert Juuse, 2015. "Estonian banking regulation as a “world of ‘dead letters’” – the interplay of Europeanization process and national idiosyncrasies," The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 60, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tth:wpaper:61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Shobhit Shakya (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ahittee.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.