[go: up one dir, main page]

IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/eccchp/978-3-319-43940-2_11.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Competition in the German Market for Retail Electricity: An Agent-Based Simulation

In: Innovation Networks for Regional Development

Author

Listed:
  • Malcolm Yadack

    (Universität Hohenheim)

  • Ben Vermeulen

    (Universität Hohenheim)

  • Andreas Pyka

    (Universität Hohenheim)

Abstract
Liberalizing retail energy markets has become a tool for policy makers worldwide to introduce competition into a sector historically characterized by regional monopoly. Opening up the products offered by power retailers to free competition, irrespective of region or distribution network, is expected by policy makers to lead to lower markups and thus lower prices for end customers. We observe that this empirically holds true for industrial customers in Germany, but that markups in the price paid by households have not decreased as a result of increased competition. We apply a methodology of combining simulation modeling with insights obtained from survey data to develop an agent-based simulation of the liberalization of a retail electricity market. In the model, firms adjust prices by adjusting their markups to increase profits. Firms also expand by installing and selling capacity in regions outside of their own. Households are heterogeneous in their preferences and in their geographic position in the simulation. We show that for a wide range of realistic parameter settings, firm markups do not converge to zero in the long run, but flatten out to values possibly even higher than the firms’ initial markups before liberalization. Markups also initially rise before falling and/or stabilizing. This, and the non-linear path of average markups over time, indicate that liberalized markets need not leave end customers better off. Our results imply, however, also that the stability of markups is largely dependent on households’ preferences for their own regional public utility which has implications for new retail business models and investments on the regional level. The results on average markups and household preferences are corroborated by empirical data on the German market.

Suggested Citation

  • Malcolm Yadack & Ben Vermeulen & Andreas Pyka, 2017. "Competition in the German Market for Retail Electricity: An Agent-Based Simulation," Economic Complexity and Evolution, in: Ben Vermeulen & Manfred Paier (ed.), Innovation Networks for Regional Development, pages 255-272, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:eccchp:978-3-319-43940-2_11
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-43940-2_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tao Chen & Qais Alsafasfeh & Hajir Pourbabak & Wencong Su, 2017. "The Next-Generation U.S. Retail Electricity Market with Customers and Prosumers—A Bibliographical Survey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Bustos, Cristian & Watts, David & Olivares, Daniel, 2019. "The evolution over time of Distributed Energy Resource’s penetration: A robust framework to assess the future impact of prosumage under different tariff designs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    3. Georg Holtz & Christian Schnülle & Malcolm Yadack & Jonas Friege & Thorben Jensen & Pablo Thier & Peter Viebahn & Émile J. L. Chappin, 2020. "Using Agent-Based Models to Generate Transformation Knowledge for the German Energiewende—Potentials and Challenges Derived from Four Case Studies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-26, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eccchp:978-3-319-43940-2_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.