[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/e/ptr151.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Walter Trockel

Personal Details

First Name:Walter
Middle Name:
Last Name:Trockel
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:ptr151
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]
http://www.imw.uni-bielefeld.de/members/wtrockel.php
Notice that the english name "University of Bielefeld" for UNIVERSITÄT BIELEFELD is false! The correct english name is BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY. Please also enter on the Institutional level: BIELEF
495202998860
Terminal Degree:1974 Wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Fachbereich; Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn (from RePEc Genealogy)

Affiliation

Institut für Mathematische Wirtschaftsforschung
Universität Bielefeld

Bielefeld, Germany
http://www.imw.uni-bielefeld.de/
RePEc:edi:imbiede (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles Books Editorship

Working papers

  1. Papatya Duman & Walter Trockel, 2020. "Nash Smoothing on the Test Bench: Ha-Essential Equilibria," Working Papers CIE 130, Paderborn University, CIE Center for International Economics.
  2. Duman, Papatya & Trockel, Walter, 2020. "Nash Smoothing on the Test Bench: $H_{\alpha}$ -Essential Equilibria," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 632, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
  3. Fatma Aslan & Papatya Duman & Walter Trockel, 2020. "Non-cohesive TU-games: Efficiency and Duality," Working Papers CIE 138, Paderborn University, CIE Center for International Economics.
  4. Trockel, Walter, 2017. "An alternative proof for the linear utility representation theorem," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 197, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
  5. Trockel, Walter, 2017. "Über Informationsprobleme bei der Implementation von Mechanismen," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 173, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
  6. Trockel, Walter, 2017. "Rationalizability of the Nash bargaining solution," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 291, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
  7. Trockel, Walter, 2017. "A Walrasian approach to bargaining games," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 231, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
  8. Trockel, Walter, 2017. "An exact implementation of the Nash bargaining solution in dominant strategies," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 245, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
  9. Trockel, Walter & Haake, Claus-Jochen, 2017. "Thoughts on social design," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 577, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
  10. Trockel, Walter, 2017. "Integrating the Nash program into mechanism theory," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 305, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
  11. Trockel, Walter, 2017. "Classification of price-invariant preferences," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 150, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
  12. Trockel, Walter, 2017. "Unique Nash implementation for a class of bargaining solutions," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 308, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
  13. Trockel, Walter, 2017. "Linear representability without completeness and transitivity," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 207, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
  14. Trockel, Walter, 2017. "An invariance theorem for preferences and some applications," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 157, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
  15. Trockel, Walter, 2017. "On the Nash program for the Nash bargaining solution," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 306, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
  16. Trockel, Walter, 2017. "Uniqueness of individual demand at almost every budget via Sard's theorem," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 162, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
  17. Duman, Papatya & Trockel, Walter, 2016. "On non-cooperative foundation and implementation of the Nash Solution in subgame perfect equilibrium via Rubinstein’s game," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 550, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
  18. Trockel, Walter, 2014. "Robustness of intermediate agreements for the Discrete Raiffa solution," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 472, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
  19. Trockel, Walter, 2011. "An axiomatization of the sequential Raiffa solution," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 425, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
  20. Trockel, Walter, 2011. "On the meaning of the Nash product," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 354, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
  21. Trockel, Walter, 2011. "Game theory. The language of social science?," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 357, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
  22. Trockel, Walter, 2011. "An exact non-cooperative support for the sequential Raiffa solution," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 426, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
  23. Haake, Claus-Jochen & Trockel, Walter, 2011. "On Maskin monotonicity of solution based social choice rules," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 393, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
  24. Sun, N. & Trockel, W. & Yang, Z.F., 2004. "Competitive Outcomes and Endogenous Coalition Formation in an n-Person Game," Discussion Paper 2004-93, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
  25. Wilhelm Neuefeind & Walter Trockel, 1994. "Continuous Linear Representability of Binary Relations," Game Theory and Information 9405002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  26. Anderson, Robert M. & Trockel, Walter & Zhou, Lin, 1994. "Nonconvergence of the Mas-Colell and Zhou Bargaining Sets," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt0fc8c73x, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
  27. Walter Trockel, "undated". "Core-Equivalence for the Nash Bargaining Solution," Discussion Papers 03-21, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.

Articles

  1. Claus-Jochen Haake & Walter Trockel, 2020. "Introduction to the Special Issue “Bargaining”," Homo Oeconomicus: Journal of Behavioral and Institutional Economics, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 1-6, November.
  2. Papatya Duman & Walter Trockel, 2016. "On non-cooperative foundation and implementation of the Nash solution in subgame perfect equilibrium via Rubinstein's game," The Journal of Mechanism and Institution Design, Society for the Promotion of Mechanism and Institution Design, University of York, vol. 1(1), pages 83-107, December.
  3. Trockel, Walter, 2014. "Robustness of intermediate agreements for the discrete Raiffa solution," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 32-36.
  4. Trockel, Walter, 2011. "An exact non-cooperative support for the sequential Raiffa solution," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 77-83, January.
  5. Claus-Jochen Haake & Walter Trockel, 2010. "On Maskin monotonicity of solution based social choice rules," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 14(1), pages 17-25, March.
  6. Sun, Ning & Trockel, Walter & Yang, Zaifu, 2008. "Competitive outcomes and endogenous coalition formation in an n-person game," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(7-8), pages 853-860, July.
  7. Trockel, W., 2008. "The Nash product is a utility representation of the Pareto ordering," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 99(2), pages 220-222, May.
  8. Walter Trockel, 2005. "Core-equivalence for the Nash bargaining solution," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 25(1), pages 255-263, January.
  9. Nachbar, John & Trockel, Walter & Yannelis, Nicholas & Cornet, Bernard, 2004. "The Conferences at Bielefeld, St. Louis, and Urbana-Champaign," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(3-4), pages 1-1, June.
  10. W. Trockel, 2003. "Coto-Millán, P.: General Equilibrium and Welfare," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 80(3), pages 283-284, November.
  11. Walter Trockel, 2002. "12th European workshop on general equilibrium theory," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 28(53), pages 1.
  12. Walter Trockel, 2002. "Integrating the Nash program into mechanism theory," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 7(1), pages 27-43.
  13. Walter Trockel, 2002. "A universal meta bargaining implementation of the Nash solution," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 19(3), pages 581-586.
  14. Walter Trockel, 2000. "Implementations of the Nash solution based on its Walrasian characterization," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 16(2), pages 277-294.
  15. Robert M. Anderson & Walter Trockel & Lin Zhou, 1997. "Nonconvergence of the Mas-Colell and Zhou Bargaining Sets," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 65(5), pages 1227-1240, September.
  16. Trockel, Walter, 1996. "A Walrasian approach to bargaining games," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 295-301, June.
  17. Neuefeind, Wilhelm & Trockel, Walter, 1995. "Continuous Linear Representability of Binary Relations," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 6(2), pages 351-356, July.
  18. Trockel, Walter, 1992. "An Alternative Proof for the Linear Utility Representation Theorem," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 2(2), pages 298-302, April.
  19. Trockel, Walter, 1989. "Classification of budget-invariant monotonic preferences," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 7-10.
  20. Trockel, Walter, 1984. "On the uniqueness of individual demand at almost every price system," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 397-399, August.
  21. Grodal, Birgit & Trockel, Walter & Weber, Shlomo, 1984. "On approximate cores of non-convex economies," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 15(3-4), pages 197-202.
  22. Dierker, Egbert & Dierker, Hildegard & Trockel, Walter, 1984. "Price-dispersed preferences and C1 mean demand," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 11-42, April.
  23. Trockel, Walter, 1983. "Market demand is a continuous function of prices," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 141-146.
  24. Dierker, Egbert & Dierker, Hildegard & Trockel, Walter, 1980. "Continuous mean demand functions derived from non-convex preferences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 27-33, March.
  25. Dierker, Egbert & Dierker, Hildegard & Trockel, Walter, 1980. "Smoothing demand by aggregation with respect to wealth," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 227-247, December.
  26. Trockel, Walter, 1976. "A limit theorem on the core," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 247-264, December.

Books

  1. Daniel Kuhn, 2005. "Generalized Bounds for Convex Multistage Stochastic Programs," Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Springer, number 978-3-540-26901-4 edited by M. Beckmann & H. P. Künzi & G. Fandel & W. Trockel & A. Basile & A. Drexl & H. Dawid & K. Inderfurth, October.

Editorship

  1. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Springer.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Trockel, Walter, 2017. "An alternative proof for the linear utility representation theorem," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 197, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.

    Cited by:

    1. Debasis Mishra & Arunava Sen, 2010. "Roberts' theorem with neutrality: A Social welfare ordering approach," Discussion Papers 10-03, Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi.
    2. Rene’ van den Brink & Agnieszka Rusinowska, 2023. "Degree Centrality, von Neumann-Morgenstern Expected Utility and Externalities in Networks," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 23-061/II, Tinbergen Institute.
    3. José Faro, 2013. "Cobb-Douglas preferences under uncertainty," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 54(2), pages 273-285, October.
    4. René van den Brink & Agnieszka Rusinowska, 2022. "The degree measure as utility function over positions in graphs and digraphs," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) hal-03513560, HAL.
    5. René van den Brink & Agnieszka Rusinowska, 2017. "The degree measure as utility function over positions in networks," Post-Print halshs-01592181, HAL.
    6. Herden, Gerhard & Pallack, Andreas, 2002. "Consistency in ordinal data analysis I," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 79-113, January.
    7. Candeal, Juan Carlos & Induráin, Esteban & Molina, José Alberto, 2007. "Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility: An Algebraic Characterization of Projective Preorders and Some Welfare Consequences," IZA Discussion Papers 2594, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    8. René Van Den Brink & Agnieszka Rusinowska, 2023. "Degree Centrality, von Neumann-Morgenstern Expected Utility and Externalities in Networks," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 23012r, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne, revised Jun 2024.
    9. Tapan Mitra & Kemal Ozbek, 2021. "Ranking by weighted sum," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 72(2), pages 511-532, September.

  2. Trockel, Walter, 2017. "Rationalizability of the Nash bargaining solution," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 291, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.

    Cited by:

    1. José Faro, 2013. "Cobb-Douglas preferences under uncertainty," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 54(2), pages 273-285, October.
    2. Trockel, Walter, 2011. "On the meaning of the Nash product," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 354, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    3. Trockel, W., 2008. "The Nash product is a utility representation of the Pareto ordering," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 99(2), pages 220-222, May.

  3. Trockel, Walter, 2017. "A Walrasian approach to bargaining games," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 231, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.

    Cited by:

    1. Trockel, Walter, 2011. "Core-equivalence for the Nash bargaining solution," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 355, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    2. Walter Trockel, 1999. "Integrating the Nash Program into Mechanism Theory," UCLA Economics Working Papers 787, UCLA Department of Economics.
    3. Sun, Ning & Trockel, Walter & Yang, Zaifu, 2011. "Competitive outcomes and endogenous coalition formation in an n-person game," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 358, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    4. Trockel, Walter, 2017. "Can and should the Nash Program be looked at as a part of mechanism theory," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 322, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    5. Alon, Shiri & Lehrer, Ehud, 2019. "Competitive equilibrium as a bargaining solution: An axiomatic approach," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 60-71.
    6. Brangewitz, Sonja & Gamp, Jan-Philip, 2016. "Inner Core, Asymmetric Nash Bargaining Solutions and Competitive Payoffs," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 453, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    7. Claus-Jochen Haake & Walter Trockel, 2022. "Socio-legal systems and implementation of the Nash solution in Debreu–Hurwicz equilibrium," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 26(4), pages 635-649, December.
    8. Sonja Brangewitz & Jan-Philip Gamp, 2014. "Competitive outcomes and the inner core of NTU market games," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 57(3), pages 529-554, November.
    9. Trockel, Walter, 2017. "On the Nash program for the Nash bargaining solution," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 306, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    10. Papatya Duman & Walter Trockel, 2020. "Nash Smoothing on the Test Bench: Ha-Essential Equilibria," Working Papers CIE 130, Paderborn University, CIE Center for International Economics.
    11. Papatya Duman & Walter Trockel, 2016. "On non-cooperative foundation and implementation of the Nash solution in subgame perfect equilibrium via Rubinstein's game," The Journal of Mechanism and Institution Design, Society for the Promotion of Mechanism and Institution Design, University of York, vol. 1(1), pages 83-107, December.
    12. Trockel, Walter, 2017. "Unique Nash implementation for a class of bargaining solutions," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 308, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    13. Brangewitz, Sonja & Gamp, Jan-Philip, 2013. "Asymmetric Nash bargaining solutions and competitive payoffs," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 224-227.
    14. Duman, Papatya & Trockel, Walter, 2020. "Nash Smoothing on the Test Bench: $H_{\alpha}$ -Essential Equilibria," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 632, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.

  4. Trockel, Walter, 2017. "An exact implementation of the Nash bargaining solution in dominant strategies," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 245, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.

    Cited by:

    1. Walter Trockel, 1999. "Integrating the Nash Program into Mechanism Theory," UCLA Economics Working Papers 787, UCLA Department of Economics.
    2. Jackson, Matthew O., 1999. "A Crash Course in Implementation Theory," Working Papers 1076, California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences.
    3. Trockel, Walter, 2017. "On the Nash program for the Nash bargaining solution," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 306, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.

  5. Trockel, Walter, 2017. "Integrating the Nash program into mechanism theory," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 305, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.

    Cited by:

    1. Haake, Claus-Jochen, 2009. "Two support results for the Kalai-Smorodinsky solution in small object division markets," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 177-187, March.
    2. Roberto Serrano, 2004. "Fifty Years of the Nash Program, 1953-2003," Working Papers 2004-20, Brown University, Department of Economics.
    3. Sun, Ning & Trockel, Walter & Yang, Zaifu, 2011. "Competitive outcomes and endogenous coalition formation in an n-person game," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 358, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    4. Trockel, Walter, 2017. "Can and should the Nash Program be looked at as a part of mechanism theory," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 322, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    5. Trockel, Walter, 2011. "An exact non-cooperative support for the sequential Raiffa solution," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 426, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    6. Hannu Vartiainen, 2007. "Nash implementation and the bargaining problem," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 29(2), pages 333-351, September.
    7. Kang Rong, 2018. "Fair Allocation When Players' Preferences Are Unknown," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 56(1), pages 497-509, January.
    8. Ju, Yuan, 2012. "Reject and renegotiate: The Shapley value in multilateral bargaining," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(6), pages 431-436.
    9. Trockel, Walter, 2017. "On the Nash program for the Nash bargaining solution," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 306, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    10. Claus-Jochen Haake & Walter Trockel, 2010. "On Maskin monotonicity of solution based social choice rules," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 14(1), pages 17-25, March.
    11. Papatya Duman & Walter Trockel, 2016. "On non-cooperative foundation and implementation of the Nash solution in subgame perfect equilibrium via Rubinstein's game," The Journal of Mechanism and Institution Design, Society for the Promotion of Mechanism and Institution Design, University of York, vol. 1(1), pages 83-107, December.
    12. Trockel, Walter, 2017. "Unique Nash implementation for a class of bargaining solutions," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 308, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.

  6. Trockel, Walter, 2017. "Unique Nash implementation for a class of bargaining solutions," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 308, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.

    Cited by:

    1. Haake, Claus-Jochen, 2009. "Two support results for the Kalai-Smorodinsky solution in small object division markets," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 177-187, March.
    2. Walter Trockel, 1999. "Integrating the Nash Program into Mechanism Theory," UCLA Economics Working Papers 787, UCLA Department of Economics.
    3. Roberto Serrano, 2004. "Fifty Years of the Nash Program, 1953-2003," Working Papers 2004-20, Brown University, Department of Economics.
    4. Trockel, Walter, 2017. "Can and should the Nash Program be looked at as a part of mechanism theory," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 322, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    5. Hirofumi Yamamura & Ryo Kawasaki, 2013. "Generalized average rules as stable Nash mechanisms to implement generalized median rules," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 40(3), pages 815-832, March.
    6. Claus-Jochen Haake & Walter Trockel, 2010. "On Maskin monotonicity of solution based social choice rules," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 14(1), pages 17-25, March.

  7. Trockel, Walter, 2017. "On the Nash program for the Nash bargaining solution," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 306, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.

    Cited by:

    1. Trockel, Walter, 2017. "Unique Nash implementation for a class of bargaining solutions," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 308, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.

  8. Duman, Papatya & Trockel, Walter, 2016. "On non-cooperative foundation and implementation of the Nash Solution in subgame perfect equilibrium via Rubinstein’s game," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 550, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.

    Cited by:

    1. Claus-Jochen Haake & Walter Trockel, 2021. "Socio-legal Systems and Implementation of the Nash Solution in Debreu-Hurwicz Equilibrium," Working Papers CIE 140, Paderborn University, CIE Center for International Economics.
    2. Roberto Serrano, 2020. "Sixty-Seven Years of the Nash Program: Time for Retirement?," Working Papers 2020-20, Brown University, Department of Economics.
    3. Papatya Duman & Walter Trockel, 2020. "Nash Smoothing on the Test Bench: Ha-Essential Equilibria," Working Papers CIE 130, Paderborn University, CIE Center for International Economics.
    4. Alfredo Valencia-Toledo & Juan Vidal-Puga, 2020. "A sequential bargaining protocol for land rental arrangements," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 24(1), pages 65-99, June.
    5. Haake, Claus-Jochen & Trockel, Walter, 2021. "Socio-legal Systems and Implementation of the Nash Solution in Debreu-Hurwicz Equilibrium," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 647, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    6. Duman, Papatya & Trockel, Walter, 2020. "Nash Smoothing on the Test Bench: $H_{\alpha}$ -Essential Equilibria," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 632, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.

  9. Trockel, Walter, 2014. "Robustness of intermediate agreements for the Discrete Raiffa solution," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 472, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.

    Cited by:

    1. Saglam, Ismail, 2012. "A simple axiomatization of the egalitarian solution," MPRA Paper 36773, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. William Thomson, 2022. "On the axiomatic theory of bargaining: a survey of recent results," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 26(4), pages 491-542, December.
    3. Saglam, Ismail, 2016. "An Alternative Characterization for Iterated Kalai-Smorodinsky-Nash Compromise," MPRA Paper 73564, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Ismail Saglam, 2017. "Iterated Kalai–Smorodinsky–Nash compromise," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 40(1), pages 335-349, November.
    5. Shiran Rachmilevitch, 2021. "Step-by-step negotiations and utilitarianism," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 50(2), pages 433-445, June.
    6. Ephraim Zehavi & Amir Leshem, 2018. "On the Allocation of Multiple Divisible Assets to Players with Different Utilities," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 52(1), pages 253-274, June.
    7. Walter Trockel, 2015. "Axiomatization of the discrete Raiffa solution," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 3(1), pages 9-17, April.

  10. Trockel, Walter, 2011. "An axiomatization of the sequential Raiffa solution," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 425, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.

    Cited by:

    1. Saglam, Ismail, 2012. "A simple axiomatization of the egalitarian solution," MPRA Paper 36773, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Eric Guerci & Sylvie Thoron, 2011. "Experimental comparison of compulsory and non compulsory arbitration mechanisms," Working Papers halshs-00584328, HAL.
    3. Emily Tanimura & Sylvie Thoron, 2016. "How Best to Disagree in Order to Agree?," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(03), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Trockel, Walter, 2011. "An exact non-cooperative support for the sequential Raiffa solution," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 426, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    5. Trockel, Walter, 2014. "Robustness of intermediate agreements for the Discrete Raiffa solution," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 472, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    6. Ismail Saglam, 2017. "Iterated Kalai–Smorodinsky–Nash compromise," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 40(1), pages 335-349, November.
    7. Anbarci, Nejat & Sun, Ching-jen, 2013. "Robustness of intermediate agreements and bargaining solutions," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 367-376.
    8. Claus-Jochen Haake, 2009. "Dividing By Demanding: Object Division Through Market Procedures," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 11(01), pages 15-32.
    9. Ephraim Zehavi & Amir Leshem, 2018. "On the Allocation of Multiple Divisible Assets to Players with Different Utilities," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 52(1), pages 253-274, June.
    10. Walter Trockel, 2015. "Axiomatization of the discrete Raiffa solution," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 3(1), pages 9-17, April.
    11. Haake, Claus-Jochen, 2016. "Dividing by Demanding: Object Division through Market Procedures," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 359, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    12. Haruo Imai & Hannu Salonen, 2012. "A characterization of a limit solution for finite horizon bargaining problems," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 41(3), pages 603-622, August.

  11. Trockel, Walter, 2011. "An exact non-cooperative support for the sequential Raiffa solution," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 426, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.

    Cited by:

    1. Emily Tanimura & Sylvie Thoron, 2016. "How Best to Disagree in Order to Agree?," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(03), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Diskin, A. & Koppel, M. & Samet, D., 2011. "Generalized Raiffa solutions," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 452-458.
    3. William Thomson, 2022. "On the axiomatic theory of bargaining: a survey of recent results," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 26(4), pages 491-542, December.
    4. Roberto Serrano, 2020. "Sixty-Seven Years of the Nash Program: Time for Retirement?," Working Papers 2020-20, Brown University, Department of Economics.
    5. Papatya Duman & Walter Trockel, 2016. "On non-cooperative foundation and implementation of the Nash solution in subgame perfect equilibrium via Rubinstein's game," The Journal of Mechanism and Institution Design, Society for the Promotion of Mechanism and Institution Design, University of York, vol. 1(1), pages 83-107, December.
    6. Ephraim Zehavi & Amir Leshem, 2018. "On the Allocation of Multiple Divisible Assets to Players with Different Utilities," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 52(1), pages 253-274, June.
    7. Walter Trockel, 2015. "Axiomatization of the discrete Raiffa solution," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 3(1), pages 9-17, April.
    8. Bram Driesen & Peter Eccles & Nora Wegner, 2017. "A non-cooperative foundation for the continuous Raiffa solution," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 46(4), pages 1115-1135, November.
    9. Haruo Imai & Hannu Salonen, 2012. "A characterization of a limit solution for finite horizon bargaining problems," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 41(3), pages 603-622, August.

  12. Haake, Claus-Jochen & Trockel, Walter, 2011. "On Maskin monotonicity of solution based social choice rules," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 393, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.

    Cited by:

    1. Haake, Claus-Jochen, 2009. "Two support results for the Kalai-Smorodinsky solution in small object division markets," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 177-187, March.
    2. Claus-Jochen Haake & Walter Trockel, 2021. "Socio-legal Systems and Implementation of the Nash Solution in Debreu-Hurwicz Equilibrium," Working Papers CIE 140, Paderborn University, CIE Center for International Economics.
    3. Trockel, Walter, 2011. "An exact non-cooperative support for the sequential Raiffa solution," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 426, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    4. William Thomson, 2022. "On the axiomatic theory of bargaining: a survey of recent results," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 26(4), pages 491-542, December.
    5. Claus-Jochen Haake & Walter Trockel, 2022. "Socio-legal systems and implementation of the Nash solution in Debreu–Hurwicz equilibrium," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 26(4), pages 635-649, December.
    6. Claus-Jochen Haake & Walter Trockel, 2020. "Introduction to the Special Issue “Bargaining”," Homo Oeconomicus: Journal of Behavioral and Institutional Economics, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 1-6, November.
    7. Roberto Serrano, 2020. "Sixty-Seven Years of the Nash Program: Time for Retirement?," Working Papers 2020-20, Brown University, Department of Economics.
    8. Haake, Claus-Jochen & Trockel, Walter, 2021. "Socio-legal Systems and Implementation of the Nash Solution in Debreu-Hurwicz Equilibrium," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 647, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.

  13. Sun, N. & Trockel, W. & Yang, Z.F., 2004. "Competitive Outcomes and Endogenous Coalition Formation in an n-Person Game," Discussion Paper 2004-93, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Inoue, Tomoki, 2013. "Representation of non-transferable utility games by coalition production economies," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 141-149.
    2. Camelia Bejan & Juan Camilo Gómez & Anne van den Nouweland, 2022. "On the importance of reduced games in axiomatizing core extensions," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 59(3), pages 637-668, October.
    3. Stéphane Gonzalez & Michel Grabisch, 2016. "Multicoalitional solutions," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-01293785, HAL.
    4. Stéphane Gonzalez & Michel Grabisch, 2014. "Autonomous coalitions," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 14044, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    5. Sylvain Béal & André Casajus & Eric Rémila & Philippe Solal, 2021. "Cohesive efficiency in TU-games: axiomatizations of variants of the Shapley value, egalitarian values and their convex combinations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 302(1), pages 23-47, July.
    6. Hirbod Assa & Sheridon Elliston & Ehud Lehrer, 2016. "Joint games and compatibility," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 61(1), pages 91-113, January.
    7. Fatma Aslan & Papatya Duman & Walter Trockel, 2020. "Non-cohesive TU-games: Efficiency and Duality," Working Papers CIE 138, Paderborn University, CIE Center for International Economics.
    8. Fatma Aslan & Papatya Duman & Walter Trockel, 2019. "Duality for General TU-games Redefined," Working Papers CIE 121, Paderborn University, CIE Center for International Economics.
    9. Jingang Zhao, 2018. "A Reexamination of the Coase Theorem," The Journal of Mechanism and Institution Design, Society for the Promotion of Mechanism and Institution Design, University of York, vol. 3(1), pages 111-132, December.
    10. Brangewitz, Sonja & Gamp, Jan-Philip, 2016. "Inner Core, Asymmetric Nash Bargaining Solutions and Competitive Payoffs," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 453, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    11. Sonja Brangewitz & Jan-Philip Gamp, 2014. "Competitive outcomes and the inner core of NTU market games," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 57(3), pages 529-554, November.
    12. Ju, Yuan, 2012. "Reject and renegotiate: The Shapley value in multilateral bargaining," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(6), pages 431-436.
    13. Zhao, Jingang, 2008. "The Maximal Payoff and Coalition Formation in Coalitional Games," Coalition Theory Network Working Papers 6298, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    14. Myrna Wooders, 2009. "Market Games and Clubs," Vanderbilt University Department of Economics Working Papers 0919, Vanderbilt University Department of Economics.
    15. Camelia Bejan & Juan Gómez, 2012. "Axiomatizing core extensions," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 41(4), pages 885-898, November.
    16. Oishi, Takayuki & Nakayama, Mikio & Hokari, Toru & Funaki, Yukihiko, 2016. "Duality and anti-duality in TU games applied to solutions, axioms, and axiomatizations," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 44-53.
    17. Bejan, Camelia & Gómez, Juan Camilo, 2012. "A market interpretation of the proportional extended core," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 117(3), pages 636-638.
    18. Brangewitz, Sonja & Gamp, Jan-Philip, 2014. "Competitive outcomes and the core of TU market games," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 454, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    19. Inoue, Tomoki, 2012. "Representation of transferable utility games by coalition production economies," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 143-147.
    20. Camelia Bejan & Juan Camilo Gómez, 2017. "Employment lotteries, endogenous firm formation and the aspiration core," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 5(2), pages 215-226, October.
    21. Inoue, Tomoki, 2011. "Representation of TU games by coalition production economies," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 430, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.

  14. Wilhelm Neuefeind & Walter Trockel, 1994. "Continuous Linear Representability of Binary Relations," Game Theory and Information 9405002, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. Rene’ van den Brink & Agnieszka Rusinowska, 2023. "Degree Centrality, von Neumann-Morgenstern Expected Utility and Externalities in Networks," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 23-061/II, Tinbergen Institute.
    2. José Faro, 2013. "Cobb-Douglas preferences under uncertainty," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 54(2), pages 273-285, October.
    3. Andrea Capotorti & Giulianella Coletti & Barbara Vantaggi, 2008. "Preferences Representable by a Lower Expectation: Some Characterizations," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 119-146, March.
    4. Diecidue, E., 2001. "Nonexpected utility and coherence," Other publications TiSEM 950888c3-8118-4d86-b249-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. René van den Brink & Agnieszka Rusinowska, 2022. "The degree measure as utility function over positions in graphs and digraphs," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) hal-03513560, HAL.
    6. René van den Brink & Agnieszka Rusinowska, 2017. "The degree measure as utility function over positions in networks," Post-Print halshs-01592181, HAL.
    7. Aniruddha Ghosh & M. Ali Khan & Metin Uyanik, 2022. "Continuity Postulates and Solvability Axioms in Economic Theory and in Mathematical Psychology: A Consolidation of the Theory of Individual Choice," Papers 2202.08415, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2022.
    8. Diecidue, Enrico & Wakker, Peter P., 2002. "Dutch books: avoiding strategic and dynamic complications, and a comonotonic extension," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 135-149, March.
    9. Metin Uyanik & M. Ali Khan, 2021. "The Continuity Postulate in Economic Theory: A Deconstruction and an Integration," Papers 2108.11736, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    10. Herden, Gerhard & Pallack, Andreas, 2002. "Consistency in ordinal data analysis I," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 79-113, January.
    11. Levin, Vladimir L., 2010. "On social welfare functionals: Representation theorems and equivalence classes," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 299-305, May.
    12. Bosi, Gianni & Zuanon, Magali E., 2003. "Continuous representability of homothetic preorders by means of sublinear order-preserving functions," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 333-341, July.
    13. M. Ali Khan & Metin Uyanık, 2021. "Topological connectedness and behavioral assumptions on preferences: a two-way relationship," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 71(2), pages 411-460, March.
    14. René Van Den Brink & Agnieszka Rusinowska, 2023. "Degree Centrality, von Neumann-Morgenstern Expected Utility and Externalities in Networks," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 23012r, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne, revised Jun 2024.
    15. Frederik S. Herzberg, 2013. "The (im)possibility of collective risk measurement: Arrovian aggregation of variational preferences," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 1(1), pages 69-92, May.
    16. Juan Candeal & Juan De Miguel & Esteban Induráin, 2002. "Expected utility from additive utility on semigroups," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 87-94, August.
    17. Levin, Vladimir L., 2009. "New axiomatic characterizations of utilitarianism," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 15-24, July.
    18. Enrico Diecidue, 2006. "Deriving Harsanyi’s Utilitarianism from De Finetti’s Book-Making Argument," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 61(4), pages 363-371, December.
    19. Tapan Mitra & Kemal Ozbek, 2021. "Ranking by weighted sum," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 72(2), pages 511-532, September.
    20. Levin, Vladimir L., 2010. "On collective utility functions admitting linear representations," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 364-371, May.

  15. Anderson, Robert M. & Trockel, Walter & Zhou, Lin, 1994. "Nonconvergence of the Mas-Colell and Zhou Bargaining Sets," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt0fc8c73x, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.

    Cited by:

    1. Hervés-Estévez, Javier & Moreno-García, Emma, 2015. "A bargaining-Walras approach for finite economies," MPRA Paper 69802, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Roberto Serrano & Rajiv Vohra & Oscar Volij, 2000. "On the Failure of Core Convergence in Economies with Asymmetric Information," Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers 0141, Econometric Society.
    3. Hervés-Beloso, Carlos & Hervés-Estévez, Javier & Moreno-García, Emma, 2018. "Bargaining sets in finite economies," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 93-98.
    4. Elena Iñarra & Roberto Serrano & Ken-Ichi Shimomura, 2020. "The Nucleolus, the Kernel, and the Bargaining Set: An Update," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 71(2), pages 225-266.
    5. Hervés-Estévez, Javier & Moreno-García, Emma, 2015. "A convergence result for a bargaining set," MPRA Paper 69813, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Liu, Jiuqiang, 2017. "Equivalence of the Aubin bargaining set and the set of competitive equilibria in a finite coalition production economy," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 55-61.
    7. Hervés-Estévez, Javier & Moreno-García, Emma, 2018. "Bargaining set with endogenous leaders: A convergence result," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 10-13.
    8. Sun, Ning & Trockel, Walter & Yang, Zaifu, 2011. "Competitive outcomes and endogenous coalition formation in an n-person game," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 358, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    9. Hara, Chiaki, 2005. "Bargaining set and anonymous core without the monotonicity assumption," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(4-5), pages 545-556, August.
    10. Hervés-Estévez, Javier & Moreno-García, Emma, 2014. "On bargaining sets for finite economies," MPRA Paper 62303, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 18 Jul 2014.
    11. Graziano, Maria Gabriella & Pesce, Marialaura & Urbinati, Niccolò, 2020. "Generalized coalitions and bargaining sets," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 80-89.
    12. Niccolò Urbinati, 2020. "Walrasian objection mechanism and Mas Colell's bargaining set in economies with many commodities," Working Papers 07, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    13. Kovalenkov, Alexander, 2002. "Simple Strategy-Proof Approximately Walrasian Mechanisms," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 475-487, April.
    14. Federico Echenique & Sumit Goel & SangMok Lee, 2022. "Stable allocations in discrete exchange economies," Papers 2202.04706, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    15. Bhowmik, Anuj & Saha, Sandipan, 2023. "Restricted bargaining sets in a club economy," MPRA Paper 119210, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Hara, Chiaki, 2002. "The anonymous core of an exchange economy," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(1-2), pages 91-116, September.
    17. Bhowmik, Anuj & Saha, Sandipan, 2023. "Bargaining-equilibrium equivalence," MPRA Paper 117194, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Niccolò Urbinati, 2023. "The Walrasian objection mechanism and Mas-Colell’s bargaining set in economies with many commodities," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 76(1), pages 45-68, July.
    19. Javier Hervés-Estévez & Emma Moreno-García, 2018. "A limit result on bargaining sets," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 66(2), pages 327-341, August.

  16. Walter Trockel, "undated". "Core-Equivalence for the Nash Bargaining Solution," Discussion Papers 03-21, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Stéphane Gonzalez & Michel Grabisch, 2016. "Multicoalitional solutions," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-01293785, HAL.
    2. Y. H. Gu & M. Goh & Q. L. Chen & R. D. Souza & G. C. Tang, 2013. "A new two-party bargaining mechanism," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 135-163, January.
    3. Stéphane Gonzalez & Aymeric Lardon, 2018. "Optimal deterrence of cooperation," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 47(1), pages 207-227, March.
    4. Brangewitz, Sonja & Gamp, Jan-Philip, 2016. "Inner Core, Asymmetric Nash Bargaining Solutions and Competitive Payoffs," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 453, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    5. Sonja Brangewitz & Jan-Philip Gamp, 2014. "Competitive outcomes and the inner core of NTU market games," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 57(3), pages 529-554, November.
    6. Brangewitz, Sonja & Gamp, Jan-Philip, 2013. "Asymmetric Nash bargaining solutions and competitive payoffs," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 224-227.

Articles

  1. Papatya Duman & Walter Trockel, 2016. "On non-cooperative foundation and implementation of the Nash solution in subgame perfect equilibrium via Rubinstein's game," The Journal of Mechanism and Institution Design, Society for the Promotion of Mechanism and Institution Design, University of York, vol. 1(1), pages 83-107, December.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  2. Trockel, Walter, 2014. "Robustness of intermediate agreements for the discrete Raiffa solution," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 32-36.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  3. Trockel, Walter, 2011. "An exact non-cooperative support for the sequential Raiffa solution," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 77-83, January.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  4. Claus-Jochen Haake & Walter Trockel, 2010. "On Maskin monotonicity of solution based social choice rules," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 14(1), pages 17-25, March.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  5. Sun, Ning & Trockel, Walter & Yang, Zaifu, 2008. "Competitive outcomes and endogenous coalition formation in an n-person game," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(7-8), pages 853-860, July.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  6. Trockel, W., 2008. "The Nash product is a utility representation of the Pareto ordering," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 99(2), pages 220-222, May.

    Cited by:

    1. Lorenzo Bastianello & Marco LiCalzi, 2019. "The Probability to Reach an Agreement as a Foundation for Axiomatic Bargaining," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 87(3), pages 837-865, May.
    2. Claus-Jochen Haake & Walter Trockel, 2020. "Introduction to the Special Issue “Bargaining”," Homo Oeconomicus: Journal of Behavioral and Institutional Economics, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 1-6, November.
    3. Lorenzo Bastianello & Marco LiCalzi, 2015. "Target-based solutions for Nash bargaining," Working Papers 5, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.

  7. Walter Trockel, 2005. "Core-equivalence for the Nash bargaining solution," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 25(1), pages 255-263, January.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  8. Walter Trockel, 2002. "Integrating the Nash program into mechanism theory," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 7(1), pages 27-43.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  9. Walter Trockel, 2002. "A universal meta bargaining implementation of the Nash solution," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 19(3), pages 581-586.

    Cited by:

    1. Walter Trockel, 1999. "Integrating the Nash Program into Mechanism Theory," UCLA Economics Working Papers 787, UCLA Department of Economics.
    2. Roberto Serrano, 2004. "Fifty Years of the Nash Program, 1953-2003," Working Papers 2004-20, Brown University, Department of Economics.
    3. Trockel, Walter, 2017. "Can and should the Nash Program be looked at as a part of mechanism theory," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 322, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    4. Marco-Gil, Maria del Carmen & Peris, Josep E. & Subiza, Begoña, 2012. "A Concessions-Based Mechanism for Meta-Bargaining Problems," QM&ET Working Papers 12-13, University of Alicante, D. Quantitative Methods and Economic Theory.
    5. Claus-Jochen Haake & Walter Trockel, 2022. "Socio-legal systems and implementation of the Nash solution in Debreu–Hurwicz equilibrium," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 26(4), pages 635-649, December.
    6. Claus-Jochen Haake & Walter Trockel, 2020. "Introduction to the Special Issue “Bargaining”," Homo Oeconomicus: Journal of Behavioral and Institutional Economics, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 1-6, November.
    7. Thorsten Upmann & Julia Müller, 2014. "The Structure of Firm-Specific Labour Unions," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 170(2), pages 336-364, June.
    8. Alfredo Valencia-Toledo & Juan Vidal-Puga, 2020. "A sequential bargaining protocol for land rental arrangements," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 24(1), pages 65-99, June.
    9. Haake, Claus-Jochen & Trockel, Walter, 2021. "Socio-legal Systems and Implementation of the Nash Solution in Debreu-Hurwicz Equilibrium," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 647, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    10. Papatya Duman & Walter Trockel, 2016. "On non-cooperative foundation and implementation of the Nash solution in subgame perfect equilibrium via Rubinstein's game," The Journal of Mechanism and Institution Design, Society for the Promotion of Mechanism and Institution Design, University of York, vol. 1(1), pages 83-107, December.
    11. Vidal-Puga, Juan J., 2008. "Forming coalitions and the Shapley NTU value," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(3), pages 659-671, November.
    12. M. Carmen Marco & Josep E. Peris & Begoña Subiza, 2020. "A Concessions-Based Procedure for Meta-Bargaining Problems," Homo Oeconomicus: Journal of Behavioral and Institutional Economics, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 105-120, November.

  10. Walter Trockel, 2000. "Implementations of the Nash solution based on its Walrasian characterization," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 16(2), pages 277-294.

    Cited by:

    1. Haake, Claus-Jochen, 2009. "Two support results for the Kalai-Smorodinsky solution in small object division markets," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 177-187, March.
    2. Walter Trockel, 1999. "Integrating the Nash Program into Mechanism Theory," UCLA Economics Working Papers 787, UCLA Department of Economics.
    3. Roberto Serrano, 2004. "Fifty Years of the Nash Program, 1953-2003," Working Papers 2004-20, Brown University, Department of Economics.
    4. Trockel, Walter, 2017. "Can and should the Nash Program be looked at as a part of mechanism theory," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 322, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    5. Trockel, Walter, 2011. "An exact non-cooperative support for the sequential Raiffa solution," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 426, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    6. Brangewitz, Sonja & Gamp, Jan-Philip, 2016. "Inner Core, Asymmetric Nash Bargaining Solutions and Competitive Payoffs," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 453, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    7. Claus-Jochen Haake & Walter Trockel, 2022. "Socio-legal systems and implementation of the Nash solution in Debreu–Hurwicz equilibrium," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 26(4), pages 635-649, December.
    8. Matthias Dahm & Nicolas Porteiro, 2005. "A Micro- Foundation for Non-Deterministic Contests of the Logit Form," Discussion Papers 1410, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
    9. Claus-Jochen Haake & Walter Trockel, 2020. "Introduction to the Special Issue “Bargaining”," Homo Oeconomicus: Journal of Behavioral and Institutional Economics, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 1-6, November.
    10. Esat Cetemen & Emin Karagözoğlu, 2014. "Implementing equal division with an ultimatum threat," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 77(2), pages 223-236, August.
    11. Claus-Jochen Haake & Walter Trockel, 2010. "On Maskin monotonicity of solution based social choice rules," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 14(1), pages 17-25, March.
    12. Thorsten Upmann & Julia Müller, 2014. "The Structure of Firm-Specific Labour Unions," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 170(2), pages 336-364, June.
    13. Papatya Duman & Walter Trockel, 2016. "On non-cooperative foundation and implementation of the Nash solution in subgame perfect equilibrium via Rubinstein's game," The Journal of Mechanism and Institution Design, Society for the Promotion of Mechanism and Institution Design, University of York, vol. 1(1), pages 83-107, December.

  11. Robert M. Anderson & Walter Trockel & Lin Zhou, 1997. "Nonconvergence of the Mas-Colell and Zhou Bargaining Sets," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 65(5), pages 1227-1240, September.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  12. Trockel, Walter, 1996. "A Walrasian approach to bargaining games," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 295-301, June.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  13. Neuefeind, Wilhelm & Trockel, Walter, 1995. "Continuous Linear Representability of Binary Relations," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 6(2), pages 351-356, July.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  14. Trockel, Walter, 1992. "An Alternative Proof for the Linear Utility Representation Theorem," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 2(2), pages 298-302, April.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  15. Trockel, Walter, 1989. "Classification of budget-invariant monotonic preferences," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 7-10.

    Cited by:

    1. Rossella Argenziano & Itzhak Gilboa, 2018. "Psychophysical Foundations of the Cobb-Douglas Utility Function," Working Papers hal-01933881, HAL.
    2. Rene’ van den Brink & Agnieszka Rusinowska, 2023. "Degree Centrality, von Neumann-Morgenstern Expected Utility and Externalities in Networks," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 23-061/II, Tinbergen Institute.
    3. José Faro, 2013. "Cobb-Douglas preferences under uncertainty," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 54(2), pages 273-285, October.
    4. René van den Brink & Agnieszka Rusinowska, 2022. "The degree measure as utility function over positions in graphs and digraphs," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) hal-03513560, HAL.
    5. Candeal, J. C. & Indurain, E., 1995. "Homothetic and weakly homothetic preferences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 147-158.
    6. René van den Brink & Agnieszka Rusinowska, 2017. "The degree measure as utility function over positions in networks," Post-Print halshs-01592181, HAL.
    7. Jean-Michel Grandmont, 1991. "Transformations of the Commodity Space, Behavioral Heterogeneity and the Aggregation Problem," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 987, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    8. Trockel, W., 2008. "The Nash product is a utility representation of the Pareto ordering," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 99(2), pages 220-222, May.
    9. Miyake, Mitsunobu, 2016. "Logarithmically homogeneous preferences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 1-9.
    10. René Van Den Brink & Agnieszka Rusinowska, 2023. "Degree Centrality, von Neumann-Morgenstern Expected Utility and Externalities in Networks," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 23012r, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne, revised Jun 2024.

  16. Trockel, Walter, 1984. "On the uniqueness of individual demand at almost every price system," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 397-399, August.

    Cited by:

    1. Michael Jerison, 2023. "Social welfare and the unrepresentative representative consumer," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 25(1), pages 5-28, February.

  17. Grodal, Birgit & Trockel, Walter & Weber, Shlomo, 1984. "On approximate cores of non-convex economies," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 15(3-4), pages 197-202.

    Cited by:

    1. Ellickson, Bryan & Grodal, Birgit & Scotchmer, Suzanne & Zame, William R., 2001. "Clubs and the Market: Large Finite Economies," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 101(1), pages 40-77, November.
    2. Hara, C., 2004. "Existence of Equilibria and Core Convergence in Economies with Bads," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0413, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    3. Alejandro Manelli, 1990. "Core Convergence Without Monotone Preferences or Free Disposal," Discussion Papers 891, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.

  18. Dierker, Egbert & Dierker, Hildegard & Trockel, Walter, 1984. "Price-dispersed preferences and C1 mean demand," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 11-42, April.

    Cited by:

    1. Martin Peitz, 1999. "- Aggregation In A Model Of Price Competition," Working Papers. Serie AD 1999-26, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    2. José Faro, 2013. "Cobb-Douglas preferences under uncertainty," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 54(2), pages 273-285, October.
    3. Gaël Giraud & Isabelle Maret, 2007. "The Exact Insensitivity of Market Budget Shares and the "Balancing Effect"," Post-Print halshs-00155753, HAL.
    4. Grandmont, Jean-michel, 1992. "Aggregation, learning and rationality," CEPREMAP Working Papers (Couverture Orange) 9214, CEPREMAP.
    5. Gael Giraud & Isabelle Maret, 2001. "Behavioral Heterogeneity in Large Economies," Working Papers of BETA 2001-08, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    6. Jean-Michel Grandmont, 1991. "Transformations of the Commodity Space, Behavioral Heterogeneity and the Aggregation Problem," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 987, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    7. Kneip, Alois, 1999. "Behavioral heterogeneity and structural properties of aggregate demand," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 49-79, February.
    8. John K. -H. Quah & Gerelt Tserenjigmid, 2022. "Price Heterogeneity as a source of Heterogenous Demand," Papers 2201.03784, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    9. Jean-Michel Grandmont, 2017. "Behavioral Heterogeneity : Pareto Distributions of Homothetic Preference Scales and Aggregate Expenditures Income Elasticities," Working Papers 2017:22, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    10. Gael GIRAUD & Isabelle MARET, 2002. "Modelling Behavioral Heterogeneity," Working Papers of BETA 2002-22, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    11. Werner Hildenbrand & Alois Kneip, 2005. "On behavioral heterogeneity," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 25(1), pages 155-169, January.

  19. Dierker, Egbert & Dierker, Hildegard & Trockel, Walter, 1980. "Continuous mean demand functions derived from non-convex preferences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 27-33, March.

    Cited by:

    1. Anderson, Siwan & Francois, Patrick, 1997. "Environmental Cleanliness as a Public Good: Welfare and Policy Implications of Nonconvex Preferences," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 256-274, November.
    2. Giraud Gael & Quah John K.-H., 2003. "Homothetic or Cobb-Douglas Behavior Through Aggregation," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 1-23, December.

  20. Trockel, Walter, 1976. "A limit theorem on the core," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 247-264, December.

    Cited by:

    1. Hervés-Beloso, Carlos & Moreno-García, Emma, 2009. "Walrasian analysis via two-player games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 220-233, January.
    2. Benyamin Shitovitz & Rubinchik, Anna, "undated". "The asymptotic core, nucleolus and Shapley value of smooth market games with symmetric large players," Working Papers WP2015/9, University of Haifa, Department of Economics.
    3. Shitovitz, Benyamin & Spiegel, Menahem, 1998. "Cournot-Nash and Lindahl Equilibria in Pure Public Good Economies," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Khan, M. Ali & Qiao, Lei & Rath, Kali P. & Sun, Yeneng, 2020. "Modeling large societies: Why countable additivity is necessary," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    5. Alejandro Manelli, 1990. "Core Convergence Without Monotone Preferences or Free Disposal," Discussion Papers 891, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.

Books

  1. Daniel Kuhn, 2005. "Generalized Bounds for Convex Multistage Stochastic Programs," Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Springer, number 978-3-540-26901-4 edited by M. Beckmann & H. P. Künzi & G. Fandel & W. Trockel & A. Basile & A. Drexl & H. Dawid & K. Inderfurth, October.

    Cited by:

    1. Bomze, Immanuel M. & Gabl, Markus & Maggioni, Francesca & Pflug, Georg Ch., 2022. "Two-stage stochastic standard quadratic optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 21-34.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Rankings

This author is among the top 5% authors according to these criteria:
  1. Record of graduates

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 14 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-GTH: Game Theory (11) 2000-01-31 2000-01-31 2003-07-04 2010-02-13 2010-02-13 2014-01-17 2017-02-05 2017-05-28 2020-02-24 2020-03-02 2020-12-14. Author is listed
  2. NEP-IND: Industrial Organization (3) 2000-01-24 2000-01-24 2003-07-04
  3. NEP-HPE: History and Philosophy of Economics (2) 2017-02-05 2017-05-28
  4. NEP-MIC: Microeconomics (2) 2000-01-24 2017-02-05
  5. NEP-COM: Industrial Competition (1) 2020-02-24
  6. NEP-DES: Economic Design (1) 2020-02-24
  7. NEP-DGE: Dynamic General Equilibrium (1) 2013-01-26
  8. NEP-GER: German Papers (1) 2017-05-28
  9. NEP-LAB: Labour Economics (1) 2013-01-26
  10. NEP-ORE: Operations Research (1) 2010-02-13
  11. NEP-UPT: Utility Models and Prospect Theory (1) 2017-07-09

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Walter Trockel should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.