[go: up one dir, main page]

IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/srs/jarle0/v8y2017i8p2419-2424.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Characteristics of Non Litigation Resolution for Life Insurance Lawsuit in Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Mokhamad HUDA

    (Hang Tuah University Faculty of Law Surabaya Indonesia)

  • Agus HERNOKO

    (Airlangga University Faculty of Law Surabaya Indonesia)

  • Ridwan KHAIRANDY

    (Islamic University of Indonesia Faculty of Law Yogyakarta Indonesia)

Abstract
This study analyzed the characteristics of non litigation resolution for life insurance lawsuit in Indonesia The result found that the non litigation solution for life insurance lawsuit in Indonesia must be through Department of Mediation and Arbitration of Insurance in Indonesia known as BMAI When the mediation as the legal action from a costumer was objected the lawsuit would proceed to the adjudication When the customer won on this adjudication level the insurance company was then obligated to do some payment as mentioned on the insurance policy Furthermore when the legal action of a customer was objected the customer was then free to do an arbitrage legal action The arbitration was final and had fixed legal power Thus any appeal cassation or judicial review could not be held The solution for life insurance lawsuit through BMAI has several characteristics such as quick in procedures dynamic innovative cheap and low budget In addition the dispute solution through BMAI is confidential quick in time and supported by some experts on related types of lawsuit thus it may result in fair judgment

Suggested Citation

  • Mokhamad HUDA & Agus HERNOKO & Ridwan KHAIRANDY, 2017. "The Characteristics of Non Litigation Resolution for Life Insurance Lawsuit in Indonesia," Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, ASERS Publishing, vol. 8(8), pages 2419-2424.
  • Handle: RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:8:y:2017:i:8:p:2419-2424
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:8:y:2017:i:8:p:2419-2424. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Claudiu Popirlan (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.