[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/srs/jarle0/v8y2017i4(26)p1073-1087.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scientific Basis of the Audit Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Pavel BARANOV

    (Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management Russian Federation)

  • Alexander SHAPOSHNIKOV

    (Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management Russian Federation)

  • Galina MAKSIMOVA

    (Baikal State University Russian Federation)

  • Natalia FADEYKINA

    (Siberian Academy of Finance and Banking Novosibirsk Russian Federation)

Abstract
The article formulates develops and researches the hypothesis that the current state of scientific theory of the audit is a serious factor provoking doubts about the ability of the audit practice to perform institutional functions of fencing the society and the economy from the information risk in decision taking Reveals the author s view of key reasons for criticism and rejection of audit as a systematically organized scientific knowledge It characterizes and analyzes the international experience of theoretical development of the science about the audit positioned by authors in the context of the disciplinary matrix the author presented structural logical and verbal description of embodiments of the audit theory Based on results of the study it is argued that existing of theoretical constructs in the audit is featured by scientific theory and the need to implement collector programs for change of scientific paradigm of the audit

Suggested Citation

  • Pavel BARANOV & Alexander SHAPOSHNIKOV & Galina MAKSIMOVA & Natalia FADEYKINA, 2017. "Scientific Basis of the Audit Theory," Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, ASERS Publishing, vol. 8(4(26)), pages 1073-1087.
    • Handle: RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:8:y:2017:i:4(26):p:1073-1087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:8:y:2017:i:4(26):p:1073-1087. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Claudiu Popirlan (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.