[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/srs/jarle0/v7y2016i8p2106-2120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What are the Opinions of Tax Administration Officials Regarding Tax Policy Reforms in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Author

Listed:
  • Lejla LAZOVIC - PITA

    (Assistant professor Bosnia and Herzegovina)

  • Ana ŠTAMBUK

    (Assistant professor Croatia)

Abstract
The aim of this paper is to assess tax administration reforms in Bosnia and Herzegovina BandH After analyzing the three important preconditions for a successful tax administration reform in any post transition country which are all related to tax policy reform namely simplification of a tax system a clear strategy and political commitment from the highest authorities we firstly evaluated the success of tax policy reforms conducted in BandH so far We conclude that all tax policy reforms in BandH were conducted inconsistently which is a result of a complex constitutional and political organization of BandH Since the success of tax administration reforms relies on clear tax policy reforms we assess the implementation of the tax policy reforms through a survey conducted among three groups of experts namely tax administration officials the academia and the private sector We have developed two benchmark theoretical models where one is more classical interventionist and the other more neoliberal We find that responses in all three groups are inconsistent in both theoretical benchmark models which confirm the inconsistency of tax policy and tax administration reforms in BandH

Suggested Citation

  • Lejla LAZOVIC - PITA & Ana ŠTAMBUK, 2016. "What are the Opinions of Tax Administration Officials Regarding Tax Policy Reforms in Bosnia and Herzegovina," Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, ASERS Publishing, vol. 7(8), pages 2106-2120.
    • Handle: RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:7:y:2016:i:8:p:2106-2120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:7:y:2016:i:8:p:2106-2120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Claudiu Popirlan (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.