[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/padigm/v18y2014i1p1-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Empirical Analysis of Unsolicited Commercial E-mail

Author

Listed:
  • Satinder Kumar
  • Rishi Raj Sharma
Abstract
The online consumer marketplace is growing at an exponential rate. At the same time, technology has enhanced the capacity of online companies to promote products unethically. To ensure consumer confidence in this new marketplace and its continued growth, consumer concerns about spamming must be addressed. In the present study, the factor analysis technique was applied on the responses of respondents with regard to variables related to the issue of spamming in e-marketing, and four factors were extracted. The extracted factors were: Commercial spam, e-mail marketing threat, regulating spam and violation of privacy. The structural equationing model (SEM) has been used to confirm the factors’ results. The results indicated that the respondents were negatively inclined towards e-mail marketing. Respondents felt that the marketers are unethical, using e-mail as the promotion of marketing tool.

Suggested Citation

  • Satinder Kumar & Rishi Raj Sharma, 2014. "An Empirical Analysis of Unsolicited Commercial E-mail," Paradigm, , vol. 18(1), pages 1-19, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:padigm:v:18:y:2014:i:1:p:1-19
    DOI: 10.1177/0971890714540363
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0971890714540363
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0971890714540363?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin, Brett A. S. & Van Durme, Joël & Raulas, Mika & Merisavo, Marko, 2003. "Email Advertising: Exploratory Insights from Finland," Journal of Advertising Research, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 293-300, September.
    2. Lee, Charles M. C., 1992. "Earnings news and small traders : An intraday analysis," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(2-3), pages 265-302, August.
    3. Phillip, Marissa V. & Suri, Rajneesh, 2004. "Impact of Gender Differences on the Evaluation of Promotional Emails," Journal of Advertising Research, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(4), pages 360-368, December.
    4. Bette Stead & Jackie Gilbert, 2001. "Ethical Issues in Electronic Commerce," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 75-85, November.
    5. Hauser, John R & Wernerfelt, Birger, 1990. "An Evaluation Cost Model of Consideration Sets," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 16(4), pages 393-408, March.
    6. Gerald Häubl & Valerie Trifts, 2000. "Consumer Decision Making in Online Shopping Environments: The Effects of Interactive Decision Aids," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 4-21, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xitong Li & Jörn Grahl & Oliver Hinz, 2022. "How Do Recommender Systems Lead to Consumer Purchases? A Causal Mediation Analysis of a Field Experiment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 620-637, June.
    2. Christina Schamp & Mark Heitmann & Robin Katzenstein, 2019. "Consideration of ethical attributes along the consumer decision-making journey," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 328-348, March.
    3. Suleyman Ozarslan & P. Erhan Eren, 2018. "MobileCDP: A mobile framework for the consumer decision process," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 803-824, August.
    4. Collins, Andrew T. & Hess, Stephane & Rose, John M., 2013. "Choice modelling with search and sort data from an interactive choice experiment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 36-45.
    5. Dellaert, B.G.C. & Baker, T. & Johnson, E.J., 2017. "Partitioning Sorted Sets: Overcoming Choice Overload while Maintaining Decision Quality," ERIM Report Series Research in Management 18-2, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    6. Alan L. Montgomery & Kartik Hosanagar & Ramayya Krishnan & Karen B. Clay, 2004. "Designing a Better Shopbot," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 189-206, February.
    7. Choudhary, Vidyanand & Currim, Imran & Dewan, Sanjeev & Jeliazkov, Ivan & Mintz, Ofer & Turner, John, 2017. "Evaluation Set Size and Purchase: Evidence from a Product Search Engine," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 16-31.
    8. Jianan Wu & Arvind Rangaswamy, 2003. "A Fuzzy Set Model of Search and Consideration with an Application to an Online Market," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 411-434, March.
    9. Anderl, Eva & Schumann, Jan Hendrik & Kunz, Werner, 2016. "Helping Firms Reduce Complexity in Multichannel Online Data: A New Taxonomy-Based Approach for Customer Journeys," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 92(2), pages 185-203.
    10. deHaan, Ed & Li, Jiacui & Watts, Edward M., 2023. "Retail bond investors and credit ratings," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(1).
    11. Chen Liang & Zhan (Michael) Shi & T. S. Raghu, 2019. "The Spillover of Spotlight: Platform Recommendation in the Mobile App Market," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 1296-1318, December.
    12. Chang, Chia-Chi & Chen, Po-Yu, 2019. "Which maximizes donations: Charitable giving as an incentive or incentives for charitable giving?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 65-75.
    13. Eric Johnson & Suzanne Shu & Benedict Dellaert & Craig Fox & Daniel Goldstein & Gerald Häubl & Richard Larrick & John Payne & Ellen Peters & David Schkade & Brian Wansink & Elke Weber, 2012. "Beyond nudges: Tools of a choice architecture," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 487-504, June.
    14. Chuan-Hoo Tan & Hock-Hai Teo & Izak Benbasat, 2010. "Assessing Screening and Evaluation Decision Support Systems: A Resource-Matching Approach," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 305-326, June.
    15. Suleyman Ozarslan & P. Erhan Eren, 0. "MobileCDP: A mobile framework for the consumer decision process," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-22.
    16. Timothy J. Gilbride & Greg M. Allenby, 2004. "A Choice Model with Conjunctive, Disjunctive, and Compensatory Screening Rules," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 391-406, October.
    17. März, Armin & Lachner, Michael & Heumann, Christian G. & Schumann, Jan H. & von Wangenheim, Florian, 2021. "How You Remind Me! The Influence of Mobile Push Notifications on Success Rates in Last-Minute Bidding," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 11-24.
    18. Miguel Godinho de Matos & Pedro Ferreira, 2020. "The Effect of Binge-Watching on the Subscription of Video on Demand: Results from Randomized Experiments," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 1337-1360, December.
    19. Malay K. Dey & B. Radhakrishna (Radha), 2007. "Who Trades Around Earnings Announcements? Evidence from TORQ Data," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1‐2), pages 269-291, January.
    20. Karagözoğlu, Emin & Keskin, Kerim, 2024. "Consideration sets and reference points in a dynamic bargaining game," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 381-403.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:padigm:v:18:y:2014:i:1:p:1-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.