[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v70y2024i3p588-600.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experiences of returning to work in patients with schizophrenia after treatment: A longitudinal qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Jin Song
  • Yu-xin Zhang
  • Meng-nan Qin
  • Jia-xin Ren
  • Yan-nan Jia
  • Hong Yu
  • Yu-qiu Zhou
Abstract
Background: Returning to work (RTW) has always been regarded as one of the important indicators to evaluate the therapeutic effect of patients with schizophrenia. The existing studies on RTW in patients with schizophrenia are mostly focused on intervention measures, and the qualitative research on RTW is very limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the experience of the RTW after treatment in patients with schizophrenia. Method: A longitudinal qualitative study was conducted involving 24 patients with schizophrenia in China. The interviews were held at three time-points during their RTW process, (1) when patients had improved and were close to discharge, (2) within 1 month post-discharge, and (3) 6 months post-discharge. The interview recordings were transcribed by the research team, and transcripts were independently analyzed by two independent coders using reflexive thematic analysis. Results: A total of 24 patients with schizophrenia participated in 72 personal interviews. The thematic framework based on the experience of patients with schizophrenia reveals a three-phases of the process of RTW: improved, being at a loss, and job crisis. The study identified one theme of the first phase: the expectation and optimism. Two themes in the second phase: (1) psychological distress of upcoming work; (2) expectation of assistance pre-work. And four themes in the third phase: (1) tremendous pressure of RTW; (2) lack of medical and social support; (3) social status and interpersonal relationships change; and (4) high level of financial pressure. Conclusion: The experience of RTW is a dynamic process with great challenges in each phase, patients with schizophrenia have been deeply affected by what they have experienced. There is an urgent need to ensure that existing community and social support is integrated into daily care to support patients with schizophrenia to RTW successful. The findings of this study also suggest relevant departments and employers should be aware of the barriers to RTW for patients with schizophrenia, and take certain measures to change the current situation.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin Song & Yu-xin Zhang & Meng-nan Qin & Jia-xin Ren & Yan-nan Jia & Hong Yu & Yu-qiu Zhou, 2024. "Experiences of returning to work in patients with schizophrenia after treatment: A longitudinal qualitative study," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 70(3), pages 588-600, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:70:y:2024:i:3:p:588-600
    DOI: 10.1177/00207640231223423
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00207640231223423
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00207640231223423?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fei‐Hsiu Hsiao & Steven Klimidis & Harry Minas & Eng‐Seong Tan, 2006. "Cultural attribution of mental health suffering in Chinese societies: the views of Chinese patients with mental illness and their caregivers," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(8), pages 998-1006, August.
    2. Brinchmann, Beate & Widding-Havneraas, Tarjei & Modini, Matthew & Rinaldi, Miles & Moe, Cathrine F. & McDaid, David & Park, A-La & Killackey, Eoin & Harvey, Samuel B. & Mykletun, Arnstein, 2020. "A meta-regression of the impact of policy on the efficacy of individual placement and support," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 102936, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wan-Na Sun & Hsin-Tien Hsu & Nai-Ying Ko & Yu-Tung Huang, 2020. "Decision-Making Processes in Surrogates of Cancer Patients in a Taiwan Intensive Care Unit," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Maria Moudatsou & Sofia Koukouli & Eleutheria Palioka & Garyfalia Pattakou & Panagiota Teleme & Georgia Fasoi & Evridiki Kaba & Areti Stavropoulou, 2021. "Caring for Patients with Psychosis: Mental Health Professionals’ Views on Informal Caregivers’ Needs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Wen-Chao Zhang & Cun-Xian Jia & Ji-Yu Zhang & Lin-Lin Wang & Xian-Chen Liu, 2015. "Negative Life Events and Attempted Suicide in Rural China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, January.
    4. Shigang Liu & Ruohan Wu & Lei Li & Li Liu & Guoqin Li & Xia Zhang & Yuyan Guo & Yinghui Wang & Hong Zhang & Guangxi Li & Hui Li, 2014. "The Prevalence of Anxiety and Depression in Chinese Asthma Patients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-7, July.
    5. Wei Wang & Jie Zhang & Wayne L. Thompson, 2023. "Confucianism and Gender Ratios of Suicide in the World: A WHO Data-Based Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-11, January.
    6. Winnie WY Yuen & Samson Tse & Greg Murray & Larry Davidson, 2019. "‘From my point of view, my wife has recovered’: A qualitative investigation of caregivers’ perceptions of recovery and peer support services for people with bipolar disorder in a Chinese communi," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 65(4), pages 305-312, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:70:y:2024:i:3:p:588-600. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.