[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v31y2011i1p10-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic Microsimulation Models for Health Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Carolyn M. Rutter
  • Alan M. Zaslavsky
  • Eric J. Feuer
Abstract
Background . Microsimulation models (MSMs) for health outcomes simulate individual event histories associated with key components of a disease process; these simulated life histories can be aggregated to estimate population-level effects of treatment on disease outcomes and the comparative effectiveness of treatments. Although MSMs are used to address a wide range of research questions, methodological improvements in MSM approaches have been slowed by the lack of communication among modelers. In addition, there are few resources to guide individuals who may wish to use MSM projections to inform decisions. Methods . This article presents an overview of microsimulation modeling, focusing on the development and application of MSMs for health policy questions. The authors discuss MSM goals, overall components of MSMs, methods for selecting MSM parameters to reproduce observed or expected results (calibration), methods for MSM checking (validation), and issues related to reporting and interpreting MSM findings(sensitivity analyses, reporting of variability, and model transparency). Conclusions . MSMs are increasingly being used to provide information to guide health policy decisions. This increased use brings with it the need for both better understanding of MSMs by policy researchers, and continued improvement in methods for developing and applying MSMs.

Suggested Citation

  • Carolyn M. Rutter & Alan M. Zaslavsky & Eric J. Feuer, 2011. "Dynamic Microsimulation Models for Health Outcomes," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 31(1), pages 10-18, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:31:y:2011:i:1:p:10-18
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X10369005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X10369005
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X10369005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sita Tan & Gerrit van Oortmarssen & Nanda Piersma, 2003. "Estimating Parameters of a Microsimulation Model for Breast Cancer Screening Using the Score Function Method," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 119(1), pages 43-61, March.
    2. B W Hollocks, 2006. "Forty years of discrete-event simulation—a personal reflection," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(12), pages 1383-1399, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matteo Richiardi, 2018. "Editorial," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 11(1), pages 1-3.
    2. Cathal O'Donoghue & Gijs Dekkers, 2018. "Increasing the Impact of Dynamic Microsimulation Modelling," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 11(1), pages 61-96.
    3. Mehdi Javanbakht & Atefeh Mashayekhi & Hamid R Baradaran & AliAkbar Haghdoost & Ashkan Afshin, 2015. "Projection of Diabetes Population Size and Associated Economic Burden through 2030 in Iran: Evidence from Micro-Simulation Markov Model and Bayesian Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Deborah J Schofield & Melanie J B Zeppel & Owen Tan & Sharyn Lymer & Michelle M Cunich & Rupendra N Shrestha, 2018. "A Brief, Global History of Microsimulation Models in Health: Past Applications, Lessons Learned and Future Directions," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 11(1), pages 97-142.
    5. Wizdom Powell & Leah Frerichs & Rachel Townsley & Maria Mayorga & Jennifer Richmond & Giselle Corbie-Smith & Stephanie Wheeler & Kristen Hassmiller Lich, 2020. "The potential impact of the Affordable Care Act and Medicaid expansion on reducing colorectal cancer screening disparities in African American males," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, January.
    6. Maximilian Tremmel & Ulf-G. Gerdtham & Peter M. Nilsson & Sanjib Saha, 2017. "Economic Burden of Obesity: A Systematic Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, April.
    7. Piccarreta, Raffaella & Bonetti, Marco, 2019. "Assessing and comparing models for sequence data by microsimulation (with Supplementary Material)," SocArXiv 3mcfp, Center for Open Science.
    8. Abbygail Jaccard & Lise Retat & Martin Brown & Laura Webber & Zaid Chalabi, 2018. "Global Sensitivity Analysis of a Model Simulating an Individual’s Health State through Their Lifetime," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 11(3), pages 100-121.
    9. Alison Ritter & Nagesh Shukla & Marian Shanahan & Phuong Van Hoang & Vu Lam Cao & Pascal Perez & Michael Farrell, 2016. "Building a Microsimulation Model of Heroin Use Careers in Australia," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 9(3), pages 140-176.
    10. Alejandra Macías Sánchez & Héctor Juan Villarreal Páez, 2018. "Sostenibilidad del gasto público: Cobertura y financiamiento de enfermedades crónicas en México. (Public Spending Sustainability: Coverage and Financing of Chronic Diseases in Mexico)," Ensayos Revista de Economia, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Facultad de Economia, vol. 0(1), pages 99-134, May.
    11. Lay-Yee, Roy & Milne, Barry & Davis, Peter & Pearson, Janet & McLay, Jessica, 2015. "Determinants and disparities: A simulation approach to the case of child health care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 202-211.
    12. Jan Weymeirsch & Julian Ernst & Ralf Münnich, 2024. "Model Recalibration for Regional Bias Reduction in Dynamic Microsimulations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-25, May.
    13. Stavroula A. Chrysanthopoulou & Carolyn M. Rutter & Constantine A. Gatsonis, 2021. "Bayesian versus Empirical Calibration of Microsimulation Models: A Comparative Analysis," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 41(6), pages 714-726, August.
    14. Nadia N Abuelezam & Kathryn Rough & George R Seage III, 2013. "Individual-Based Simulation Models of HIV Transmission: Reporting Quality and Recommendations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-1, September.
    15. Cannon, Jeffrey W. & Mueller, Ute A. & Hornbuckle, Janet & Larson, Ann & Simmer, Karen & Newnham, John P. & Doherty, Dorota A., 2013. "Economic implications of poor access to antenatal care in rural and remote Western Australian Aboriginal communities: An individual sampling model of pregnancy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(2), pages 313-324.
    16. Jan Pablo Burgard & Simon Schmaus, 2019. "Sensitivity Analysis for Dynamic Microsimulation Models," Research Papers in Economics 2019-15, University of Trier, Department of Economics.
    17. Stavroula A Chrysanthopoulou, 2017. "MILC: A Microsimulation Model of the Natural History of Lung Cancer," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 10(3), pages 5-26.
    18. William, Jananie & Loong, Bronwyn & Hanna, Dana & Parkinson, Bonny & Loxton, Deborah, 2022. "Lifetime health costs of intimate partner violence: A prospective longitudinal cohort study with linked data for out-of-hospital and pharmaceutical costs," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    19. Zaid Chalabi & Sari Kovats, 2014. "Tools for developing adaptation policy to protect human health," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 309-330, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. J H Powell & N Mustafee, 2017. "Widening requirements capture with soft methods: an investigation of hybrid M&S studies in health care," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(10), pages 1211-1222, October.
    2. Hideki Higashi & Jan J Barendregt, 2011. "Cost-Effectiveness of Total Hip and Knee Replacements for the Australian Population with Osteoarthritis: Discrete-Event Simulation Model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-11, September.
    3. S J E Taylor & T Eldabi & G Riley & R J Paul & M Pidd, 2009. "Simulation modelling is 50! Do we need a reality check?," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 69-82, May.
    4. Tazio Vanni & Jonathan Karnon & Jason Madan & Richard White & W. Edmunds & Anna Foss & Rosa Legood, 2011. "Calibrating Models in Economic Evaluation," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 35-49, January.
    5. K Katsaliaki & N Mustafee, 2011. "Applications of simulation within the healthcare context," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(8), pages 1431-1451, August.
    6. Davis, Peter & Lay-Yee, Roy & Pearson, Janet, 2010. "Using micro-simulation to create a synthesised data set and test policy options: The case of health service effects under demographic ageing," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(2-3), pages 267-274, October.
    7. Hazrathosseini, Arman & Moradi Afrapoli, Ali, 2023. "The advent of digital twins in surface mining: Its time has finally arrived," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    8. H Pilgrim & J Chilcott, 2008. "Assessment of a 7-day turn-around for the reporting of cervical smear results using discrete event simulation," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(7), pages 902-910, July.
    9. K Katsaliaki & N Mustafee & Y K Dwivedi & T Williams & J M Wilson, 2010. "A profile of OR research and practice published in the Journal of the Operational Research Society," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(1), pages 82-94, January.
    10. Jeroen J. van den Broek & Nicolien T. van Ravesteyn & Eveline A. Heijnsdijk & Harry J. de Koning, 2018. "Simulating the Impact of Risk-Based Screening and Treatment on Breast Cancer Outcomes with MISCAN-Fadia," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 38(1_suppl), pages 54-65, April.
    11. Joost van Rosmalen & Mehlika Toy & James F. O’Mahony, 2013. "A Mathematical Approach for Evaluating Markov Models in Continuous Time without Discrete-Event Simulation," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 33(6), pages 767-779, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:31:y:2011:i:1:p:10-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.