[Рейтинг Обеспеченности Социальной Инфраструктурой Как Метод Сравнительной Оценки Муниципальных Образований (На Примере Республики Башкортостан)]"> [Рейтинг Обеспеченности Социальной Инфраструктурой Как Метод Сравнительной Оценки Муниципальных Образований (На Примере Республики Башкортостан)]">
[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnp/mncplt/m22208.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rating of provision with social infrastructure as a method of comparative assessment of municipalities (by the example of the Republic of Bashkortostan)
[Рейтинг Обеспеченности Социальной Инфраструктурой Как Метод Сравнительной Оценки Муниципальных Образований (На Примере Республики Башкортостан)]

Author

Listed:
  • Stol, Anna (Столь, Анна)

    (Institute for Strategic Studies of the Republic of Bashkortostan)

Abstract
The socio-economic development management is based on the analysis of the achieved levels of the state of the social sphere from the municipal to the regional, federal levels. The development of the social sphere directly affects demographic processes, which is confirmed by studies at the regional level. There is a need for similar studies at the municipal level in order to determine the ability of the local government to influence these processes. To do this, it is advisable to develop and test a method for comparative assessment of municipalities in terms of the provision of social infrastructure. Firstly, this will make it possible to identify municipalities that are in a critical state in this matter, secondly, to compare the provision of social infrastructure in various areas within the municipalities themselves and identify weaknesses and formulate the task of finding sources to cover these deficits, and thirdly, to identify the relationship between the provision of social infrastructure and demographic processes at the municipal level. The article provides a discussion of indicators characterizing the level of social infrastructure provision of municipalities. The author proposes a methodology for assessing the provision of the population in the sectors of education, healthcare, culture and their general summary assessment, as well as the results of ranking the municipalities of the Republic of Bashkortostan according to the rating of provision with social infrastructure according to 2010 and 2020 data. The assessment was carried out according to relative indicators in 2010 and 2020 and in terms of their growth rates over these 10 years The grouping of districts and urban districts of the region according to the scales is also given: high / low rating of social infrastructure provision, high / low growth rate of its provision. Municipalities with a critical level of security (low rating/low growth rate), with a high perspective level of security (high rating, high growth rate), with a high level of security (high rating, low growth rate), with a low catch-up rate of security (low rating, high growth rate). It was revealed that for the period 2010-2020 there is a deterioration in the rating of provision with social infrastructure in most municipalities of the Republic of Bashkortostan.

Suggested Citation

  • Stol, Anna (Столь, Анна), 2022. "Rating of provision with social infrastructure as a method of comparative assessment of municipalities (by the example of the Republic of Bashkortostan) [Рейтинг Обеспеченности Социальной Инфрастру," Munitsipalitet: ekonomika i upravlenie / Municipality: Economics and Management, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, pages 85-96.
    • Handle: RePEc:rnp:mncplt:m22208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/mncplt/m22208.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:mncplt:m22208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.