[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/afajnl/v1y2015i2p88-95.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Perspective On Segment Reporting Choices And Segment Reconciliations

Author

Listed:
  • Dana Hollie
  • Shaokun£¨Carol) Yu
Abstract
In 2014, segment reporting gained third place in SEC comment letters. This article reviews the history of segment reporting including segment reporting choices and segment reconciliations, the current concerns as the level of detail in segment disclosures varies widely across organizations, the value relevance of segment reconciliations and its market consequences, and the importance of segment reporting to management. The following are highlights of the manuscript: The third-most-common area discussed in SEC comment letters: segment reporting. The application of SFAS131: the whole may not equal the sum of its parts. The level of detail in segment disclosures varies widely across organizations. Segment reconciliation adds value to consolidated earnings. Segment reconciliation can have significant market consequences. Additional guidance on segment reporting may be beneficial and necessary in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Dana Hollie & Shaokun£¨Carol) Yu, 2015. "A Perspective On Segment Reporting Choices And Segment Reconciliations," Applied Finance and Accounting, Redfame publishing, vol. 1(2), pages 88-95, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:rfa:afajnl:v:1:y:2015:i:2:p:88-95
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/afa/article/view/816/832
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/afa/article/view/816
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Segment Reporting; Segment Reconciliation; SFAS 131;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:afajnl:v:1:y:2015:i:2:p:88-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.