[go: up one dir, main page]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pmu/cjurid/v72y2018p13-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

...And Justice For All. Legal Interpretation On Democratic Values

Author

Listed:
  • Brindusa GOREA

    (Professor, PhD, "Dimitrie Cantemir" University of Tirgu Mures, ROMANIA.)

Abstract
The democratic ideal of justice for all is challenged in the contemporary world by the conflicting nature of the values that Law is called to defend. The accelerated rhythm of social change causes law to fall behind life, and over-regulation is not the solution to create a "living justice". It is the responsibility of judges to adapt Law to the changing needs of society, and in the continental legal tradition these judges apply the law, but do not create it. In this paper, we argue that this traditional view of the judge`s role is outdated and that we must acknowledge the increasingly interpretative role of the courts. History has proven that laws can be unjust and even criminal, but the principles and values of the Law are perennial. When law contradicts Justice, it is the judge's duty to make use of his own moral sense and interpret law extensively in accordance with the situation and the idea of Justice. Meanwhile, as a guardian of the "living justice", the judge has a huge social responsibility that goes far beyond mere legal (disciplinary, civil and criminal) liability. Consequently, it is imperative that we take additional precautionary measures in the appointment and the evaluation of judges. In our opinion, this is the kind of public matter we should debate, rather than the one regarding the magistrates' liability. After all, when we speak of liability, the malicious act has already been done. It is preferable to focus on preventing injustice and other social illnesses and to build a society that is healthy, adaptable and ready to face the challenges of the future. This is the only way to continue to aspire to the ideal of justice for all, and manage to harmonize so many contradictory democratic values, such as freedom and responsibility, unity and diversity, citizens' liberties and public security. The coexistence of values can only be the result of a continuous interpretive effort that excludes any a priori suppression of some of the values in favour of others.

Suggested Citation

  • Brindusa GOREA, 2018. "...And Justice For All. Legal Interpretation On Democratic Values," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 72, pages 13-26, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:72:y:2018:p:13-26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/curentul_juridic/rcj18/recjurid181_1F.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gabriela-Aura FODOR, 2017. "The Criminalization Of Child Pornography: The Problem Of Ensuring A Balance Between Fundamental Human Rights And Public Order And Morals," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 68, pages 107-115, March.
    2. Lucian CHIRIAC, 2013. "L’Organisation D’Une Justice Indépendante – Partie Du Mécanisme De Construction De L’État De Droit," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 53, pages 21-35, June.
    3. Dragos CHILEA, 2016. "Justice And Democracy Defeated By Human Rights," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 67, pages 77-84, December.
    4. Lucian CHIRIAC & Sonia Bianca BLAJ, 2016. "Settlement Vs. Mediation In The Criminal Trial," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 67, pages 148-158, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lucian CHIRIAC & Roxana Silvia TRUTA, 2017. "Sur L'Indépendance Des Juges Et Leur Soumission Seulement Devant La Loi En Roumanie En Vue Des Propositions De Modification De La Loi No. 303/2004 Sur Le Statut Des Juges Et Des Procureurs Et La Loi N," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 71, pages 52-65, December.
    2. Daniela Cristina VALEA, 2017. "Some Consideration Regarding Legal Limitations About Asset Freezing During The Criminal Trial In Romania," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 71, pages 166-174, December.
    3. Lucian CHIRIAC, 2017. "Abuse Of Office And The Magistrate’S Liability In The Interpretation And Application Of The Rule Of Law," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 71, pages 153-165, December.
    4. Daniela Cristina VALEA, 2014. "Consecration Of The Concept Of “Constitutional Democracy” And “Supreme Values” Provided In Article 1 Of The Romanian Constitution Republished And Also Through The Constitutional Court Of Romania," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 58, pages 28-38, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    justice; legal interpretation; democratic values; social change;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K40 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:72:y:2018:p:13-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bogdan Voaidas (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feuttro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.